Skriniar is genuinely shit, he would just be a poor investment.
Sanchez's return | is not happening - he signs for Inter
- Thread starter Luke1995
- Start date
- Status
Every time I see this thread title an image of that Toby noo god no office thing instantly pops into my head.
Don't trust all these ITKs but hopefully that happens. Sanchez has no place back at Manchester United.
Good to see you aren't getting the same amount of abuse I got the other day for posting their info. Seriously, people can look at their past posts and judge reliability for themselves. They are actually pretty good.
Also, even ITK4 (who posts himself regularly) says that G5 is probably the best for United related info as he's inside the club. The remaining ones seem to be good but don't have enough of a track record to know for sure.
One can only hope and pray. I think even United will have a need to balance the books for the next few years particularly if the stadiums remain empty. Getting rid of him Mata, jones and lingard, rojo would save probably 1m per week in salary and all should go, give them away if needs be.
Surely we can just give them for free without any obligation for anything.
Why would they (Inter) do that? Pay £20m and then pay him wages again? Doesn't sound like a smart move for them. The realistic options are two: another subsidised loan or transfer for a very low amount so the buying club can offer similar wages.
The bought Victor Moses it could happen
They bought Lukuku.
Just imagine if we offloaded Lukuku, Sanchez and Young to them in the space of 12 months.
They buy any old crap.
Sorry
Sorry, I meant inter pay him that over say a 2 year contract so overall he gets the same whether he stays or goes.
That makes sense, hopefully some club would agree to that. There are some rumours Inter are interested, I'm guessing Sanchez is making some good returns on the marketing and merchandising side of business
New tax law in Italy means that high earners only get taxed on 50% of their income. Inter can pay him less than United do and still match his take home income. This is a big reason why Italian teams are attracting bigger names at the moment.
If we sell them more players we should wear their logo on the sleeve as a sponsor.
His take home is about £240k in the UK. For Inter to match that they have to pay him about £310k a week gross.
They can be the Man Utd outlet store where we sell our players who are slight seconds, or last years fashion.
Also since we might be tempted to sell him for nothing (or very small fee) he can get good signing on fee to compensate for lower wage.
I don't think Inter will pay that much in wages as he would be their highest earning player which would mess up their future contracts.
I get shivers when I hear word "Sanches". It's crazy to think that Ed allowed this to happen (20 million a year for 4 or 5 years). Sanches is the reason why I lost all respect for Mourinho. IMHO I don't think we will be able to do anything with his salary.
sanchez is pretty bad but you really think he beats shevchenko, andy carroll or torres? i mean money wise he did cost us nothing didn't he even if we are paying him an arm and a leg?
They won’t cover it all but the tax situation over there makes a more economically palatable solution more likely for us.
this is a good summary of our post fergie transfer muppetry and zeitgeist in general.
Yeah, apparently Inter are impressed with his performance. So hopefully we get some fee for him.
Even as a free signing/swap deal I’d personally rank Sanchez as THE worst signing in Premier League history, with Shevchenko and Carroll there was the occasional highlight or performance but there’s literally nothing with Sanchez other than astronomical wages and causing splits in the dressing room.
For me Sanchez is the poster child of everything wrong at United post Sir Alex, a huge name on huge wages that was brought in to justify how we “can do things in the market other clubs can only dream of” and came for the money instead of the club.
Right-on!Agree, that would be classy of him. I'm sure he'll gain some "favor" from us fans if he does that. Doubt he will.
Why should we pay him though? to convince him? make sense, but that won't be classy.
What Zlatan did with his contract with us is also class, though it takes time of about half a season for him to accept his body is still mortal.
Arsenal and City away? Newcastle last minute winner?
He's no way worse then Andy Carroll or Drinkwater or Mutu when you consider the amount of money spent on them.
Hell i would argue that ADM and Falcao were worse transfers.
He beats the lot of them.
If you add up what he has cost us it blows those transfers out of the window.
Remember he wasn’t a free transfer, we swapped him for an asset we could have sold in Miki - who we could have sold for between £10-20m.
Sanchez was not a free transfer.
Ed got his fingers burnt with this transfer, perhaps that's why he is so cautious with transfers now.
ADM and Falcao didnt cust us much, net. ADM was sold on without much of a loss and Flacao merely a moan. None of them fecked up the wage structure and created other problems
What has Renato Sanches got to do with United?
Either way he has to go. Hopefully it'll be a win-win situation for both clubs and Sanchez. His return will once again create problems within the team - don't want him back.
That would be too perfect.
Martial was playing well at the time we bought him, then he was dropped out the team for Sanchez resulting in him not being picked for the World Cup, losing out on a World Cup winners medal his team-mate Pogba has.
I felt so sorry for Martial, but he is a professional and doing well now.
i get that it wasn't technically free but this generally seems to come from the disillusioned folk who were ecstatic the moment he signed, especially after the rude reality check since which has left no option but to indulge in some mild historical revision.
point taken though i think it is debatable. the fees paid for those 3 players was quite substantial and then some, especially at the time even if they don't look like a big deal now in comparison.It’s all subjective of course.i get that it wasn't technically free but this generally seems to come from the disillusioned folk who were ecstatic the moment he signed, especially after the rude reality check since which has left no option but to indulge in some mild historical revision.
Torres is the one that most closely resonates with Sanchez. Both previously fantastic players at a rival, and still with big reputations. The warning signs for both were very clear in retrospect.
Shevchenko always looked risky as moving to the PL letter on in his career, and Andy Carroll was just strange - no one except Dalgliesh thought he would be a success.
this is right. i do read the serie a forums and the inter fans seem to have favorable opinions of all 3 of young, lukaku and sanchez. not sure what that means considering how bad we have been over the past year apart from a few spells here and there and a transfer policy that's been like a man having a midlife crisis while inter have been stable in that serie a top 4 though never looked like challenging juve.
I think it just shows the relative strengths of the respective leagues.
I thought I was the only one on here who followed that Subreddit, given Caf's collective revulsion to ITKs. Gotta say ITK4 has proven to be genuine and reliable, and he just doesn't make claims about big transfers. I think he's gone on record mentioning he's involved on the legal side of things with one of the club's in the Bundesliga, but all the info he shares is at least a couple of weeks delayed because he doesn't share info on deals he's actively working with.
We were awful in the first half of that game against City away if memory serves me right and it was Pogba that dominated the comeback, I’ll give you Arsenal away if you meant the fa cup game ? Don’t remember Newcastle but 1 good game and half a good game doesn’t justify smashing our wage structure, alienating everyone else, stunting Martial and Rashford’s progress and the sheer awfulness we were subjected too every other time he played for us.
Falcao was a loan so only cost us wages and he was behind Rooney and RVP so a squad player whilst Di Maria was actually brilliant for a couple of months then moved on at about a £8 million loss, Sanchez came in and was pretty much first name on the sheet until Ole came in and is the poster child for everything wrong at United post Sir Alex.
We paid for loan fees too on Falcao not only his wages. But a year with Falcao is better than multiple years with Sanchez that gave us blank.
- Status