Scholes and Hargreaves pick their best possible current Man Utd XI

Discussion in 'Manchester United Forum' started by Walters_19_MuFc, Nov 9, 2019.

  1. Nov 9, 2019
    #1

    Walters_19_MuFc Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,623
    Location:
    Birmingham


    Scholes - 4411

    Martial
    Rashford
    James McTominay Pogba Greenwood
    Shaw Maguire Tuanzebe Wan-Bissaka
    De Gea

    Hargreaves - 343

    Rashford Martial Greenwood
    Shaw McTominay Pogba Wan-Bissaka
    Tuanzebe Maguire Lindelof
    De Gea​

    Anyone agree?
  2. Nov 9, 2019
    #2

    Bastian Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,323
    That midfield could get murdered.

    edit: Scholesey's I mean. Hargreaves' is sensible.
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2019
  3. Nov 9, 2019
    #3

    MikeUpNorth Wobbles like a massive pair of tits

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    18,147
    Think Hargreaves has it right, probably.
  4. Nov 9, 2019
    #4

    Grylte "nothing wrong with some friendly incest, bro"

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2014
    Messages:
    9,467
    Location:
    On Macern's team.
    Hargreaves' team looks much more balanced, Scholes' is gung ho.
    A bit unfair to James to not have him in there, he deserves to play over Greenwood, imo.
  5. Nov 9, 2019
    #5

    Rozay Master of Hindsight

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Messages:
    14,813
    Location:
    #SmallingPlusOne
    Scholes demonstrating his cluelessness again, and probably why he’s not cut out for management. It amazes me how simple ex-players sound when they talk about the game, especially those who played to a high level.
  6. Nov 9, 2019
    #6

    luke511 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    4,453
    Scholes' formation is more like this

    Martial
    James Rashford Greenwood
    McTominay Pogba
    Shaw Maguire Tuanzebe Wan Bissaka​
  7. Nov 9, 2019
    #7

    el3mel Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    28,622
    Location:
    Egypt
    Scholes formation is terrible with no balance.

    Hargreaves one is good though, but swap Greenwood for James.
  8. Nov 9, 2019
    #8

    Walters_19_MuFc Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,623
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Well, not really, because he quite specifically mentioned a 4411. The formation you posted above is a 4231, with two defensive midfielders and an attacking midfielder, as opposed to centre midfielders and a second striker.
  9. Nov 9, 2019
    #9

    Aidan Azar New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2014
    Messages:
    297
    Supports:
    Chelsea
    Scholes line up would be great on Fifa, real life not so much.
  10. Nov 9, 2019
    #10

    sherrinford Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2017
    Messages:
    588
    Hargreaves’ midfield is sensible but Scholes’ - with the extra man helping out - would get murdered?

    Semantics.
  11. Nov 10, 2019
    #11

    el3mel Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    28,622
    Location:
    Egypt
    Where is that extra man in Scholes formation? He has Rashford, James, Martial and Greenwood all upfront, Scott as DMF and Pogba who barely does any defensive job anyway. We will get slaughtered with this againsy any decent opposition.

    At least Hargreaves' has 3 defenders at the back to balance it out a little bit.
  12. Nov 10, 2019
    #12

    Walters_19_MuFc Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,623
    Location:
    Birmingham
    I like to call it football knowledge.
  13. Nov 10, 2019
    #13

    luke511 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    4,453
    I'm going off the TV picture animation of the formation
  14. Nov 10, 2019
    #14

    sherrinford Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2017
    Messages:
    588
    Rashford, obviously. Hargreaves’ lineup doesn’t have an obvious player to help the two midfielders defensively. Having three centre halves doesn’t balance that out either.


    Football Manager knowledge maybe...
  15. Nov 10, 2019
    #15

    el3mel Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    28,622
    Location:
    Egypt
    Rashford isn't going to balance that either. Can you imagine him defending in the center of the park? He won't do that. If we want an extra man down there then at least Pereira or something in the same position, but with Rashford behind Martial it's very unbalanced.
  16. Nov 10, 2019
    #16

    Walters_19_MuFc Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,623
    Location:
    Birmingham

    It can do because the centre half can push into the midfield and create a three, especially if it's someone like Maguire who is good on the ball.

    Nah, don't even need that football manager knowledge to know the difference between a 4231 and 4411. It's basics!
  17. Nov 10, 2019
    #17

    SalfordRed18 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    Messages:
    6,537
    Location:
    Salford
    Shock scholes went for the 4-4-2
  18. Nov 10, 2019
    #18

    hobbers Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,369
    James and Williams for Greenwood and Shaw, naturally, but otherwise Hargreaves system takes it.
  19. Nov 10, 2019
    #19

    Majima Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    1,906
    Location:
    Kami's Lookout
    I like Hargreaves' line-up.

    Vs weaker teams, what's been stopping us from lining up like that this season? Everyone knows our lack of a 10 is killing us in the way we currently play.

    Attacking:

    De Gea
    AWB - Maguire - Lindelof
    Pereira - McTominay - Fred - Young
    James - Martial - Rashford
    Defending:

    De Gea
    AWB - Maguire - Lindelof - Young
    Pereira - McTominay - Fred
    James - Martial - Rashford​

    What's stopping us from lining up like that tomorrow?
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2019
  20. Nov 10, 2019
    #20

    Walters_19_MuFc Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,623
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Haha, the United Way.
  21. Nov 10, 2019
    #21

    sherrinford Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2017
    Messages:
    588
    Of course he would, as virtually every player who is employed in that kind of role does. In that role a player is typically tasked with tracking the opposition holding midfield player. Rashford has the stomach for hard work, he would have no issues.

    A centre half is never going to push into midfield to create a three when defending in a set shape or transitioning to defence.

    At such a broad level, there is no difference at all between a 4-2-3-1 and a 4-4-1-1. What is the difference between central midfielders and defensive midfielders? What is the difference between an attacking midfielder and a second striker? How do you know when there’s not even an opponent with a shape/ lineup themselves to match up against?
  22. Nov 10, 2019
    #22

    Foxbatt Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,664
    That is a bad one from Scholes. We will get murdered. Rashford as a 10 is terrible too. He is not a good passer of the ball.
  23. Nov 10, 2019
    #23

    el3mel Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    28,622
    Location:
    Egypt
    This concept doesn't work in real football though. Otherwise formations and each player's position are pointless, put any player in any position and he will perform the roles of such position anyway. The reality is it won't happen, or it won't happen efficiently. By nature Rashford will be staying up front and looking forward to attack and if you force him to backtrack to center of midfield to offer support to the 2 midfielders on losing the ball he won't be able to do it efficiently (because he has never done that before and it has never been his role, being always a forward player) and at the same time will lose his contributions in the attack because he can't focus on it. Basically you will end up playing with 10 men on the field.

    You want to put a player who can work as extra man in midfield you put an attacking midfielder in such position like Periera, who will know how to do such role efficiently on both sides. Otherwise with such lineup Scholes has put, it's logical that Rashford will be a second striker not an attacking midfielder, which will unbalance the team and open us up for counters. It will look against some trash teams but whenever we are put under pressure or against a good counter attacking team, we will get destroyed.
  24. Nov 10, 2019
    #24

    Walters_19_MuFc Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,623
    Location:
    Birmingham
    Thought we were talking about in attack.

    Centre midfielders job, like Scholes used to do, is to get in the box, whereas a defensive midfielder is tasked to sit in front of the back four and break up play.

    A second striker is more someone who works in tandem more with the main striker and gets into the box more often, whilst leaving the centre midfielder to create, whereas an attacking midfielder is the link between midfield and attack and will try and assist the wingers and striker.

    The wingers/wide midfielders have different roles. In a 4231, wingers tend to play as wide attacking midfielders, where priority will be on finding pockets of space in between the lines, whereas wingers in a 4411 will look to exploit wide areas.
  25. Nov 10, 2019
    #25

    Class of 63 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2017
    Messages:
    5,839
    Location:
    At the RedCafe eating Sugar Puffs, where else?
    Young being suspended for starters ;)

    I know.
  26. Nov 10, 2019
    #26

    berbatrick Full Member Scout

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    13,175
    Scholes' 2 strikers may suit both Martial and Rashford, but I'm not sure it suits the rest of the team, and that midfield is very weak. Maybe a 3-5-2?

    --------------De Gea--------------
    ----Tuanzebe- Maguire - Lindelof--
    AWB -----McTominay ------ Shaw
    --------Pereira-----Pogba---------
    --------Martial--Rashford--------

    With James in for Pereira (Pogba moves further back) in easier games. I think James is better on the left, but unfortunately so is Rahford.
  27. Nov 10, 2019
    #27

    Thiagoal Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2013
    Messages:
    670
    Scholes formation is basically exactly the same as Oles apart from Rashford at number ten than the horrible, Pereira, Mata, Lingard trinity!
  28. Nov 10, 2019
    #28

    RedRonaldo Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,173
    Well to be fair, our no.10 options are really shite (Lingard, Pereira, Mata), so its better not to play any of them.
  29. Nov 10, 2019
    #29

    friendlytramp More full of crap than a curry house toilet

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,718
    Location:
    J Stand
    Hargreaves but with James (or Williams) as left wing back

    Rashford Martial Greenwood
    James McTominay Pogba Wan-Bissaka
    Tuanzebe Maguire Lindelof
    De Gea
  30. Nov 10, 2019
    #30

    SweetRightFoot New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2019
    Messages:
    95
    Hargreaves is more sensible but they both need get over the fact that Pogba is not a PL centre mid

    Should be

    De Gea
    AWB Maguire Lindelof
    James Mctominay Fred Shaw
    Pogba
    Martial Rashford
  31. Nov 10, 2019
    #31

    SirAF Ageist

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2003
    Messages:
    31,274
    Scholes’ lineup is not as bad as «Wilson in the hole», but Rashford as a #10 is a pretty bad suggestion.
  32. Nov 10, 2019
    #32

    Majima Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    1,906
    Location:
    Kami's Lookout
    How could I miss that! :wenger:

    With players available:

    Attacking:

    De Gea
    AWB - Maguire - Lindelof
    Pereira - McTominay - Fred - Williams
    James - Martial - Rashford
    Defending:

    De Gea
    AWB - Maguire - Lindelof - Williams
    Pereira - McTominay - Fred
    James - Martial - Rashford​

    Easy.

    Edit: Damn you white text! Well played. :lol:
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2019
  33. Nov 10, 2019
    #33

    Sandikan aka sex on the beach

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    26,794
    How anyone can put Greenwood ahead of James from this season's evidence i do not know.
  34. Nov 10, 2019
    #34

    11101 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Messages:
    9,800
    Hargreaves has a better balance although both midfields are light.

    Scholes showing again he has very little understanding of football despite being brilliant at it.
  35. Nov 10, 2019
    #35

    thesheriffjw New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2018
    Messages:
    109
    Exactly.

    scholes seems to be sticking the boot in at every chance he gets.

    His punditry in my opinion is pretty poor
  36. Nov 11, 2019 at 01:41
    #36

    sherrinford Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2017
    Messages:
    588
    It’s something which happens every single week in real football. Teams who line up with two forwards will look for one (or both) of them to drop in on the deepest midfield player(s) in their set defensive shape. If they are looking to press high from there, essentially that player is tasked with recognising when the opportunity to apply pressure to a centre half arises while ensuring their run is angled so that a pass to the midfielder they are responsible for is cut off. You see this all the time in games currently because pressing high is very popular and has been for a while.

    When Rooney played with Van Nistelrooy he very clearly operated deeper and would track and apply pressure to deep midfield players when the team was defending. On occasion you would see Van Nistelrooy do the same while Rooney was higher, whether that be because Rooney had made a run and the move had broke down with Van Nistelrooy covering for him, or simply because they were taking turns about sharing the workload and we just happened to see Rooney there more often because it suited how both players played in both attack and defence. The instruction for one of the two to drop in was clear. Same with Rooney and Saha. Same with Rooney and Tevez - but with Tevez generally being the one to drop in. All these players are forwards, and Rooney or Tevez playing in a position off of another striker would be labelled second strikers. Defensively, the role they played was the same as what would have been expected from Ozil, Vidal, Park Ji-Sung, Iniesta or Gerrard in the same position for those teams.

    Alexis Sanchez was outstanding for Udinese playing off of Di Natale, a workhorse who would always press the midfield in defence and occupy the defenders in attack. Marco Reus last year at Dortmund and Golovin playing off Dzyuba at the last World Cup, both looked to screen in front of the deepest midfield player and press alongside the striker when the opposition had the ball along the back four, and would look to drop goalside of said midfielder if the ball was able to be progressed forward. Suarez, against us, done a great job of cutting off passes to midfield, and applying pressure when he was bypassed often resulting in the ball being played right back. Haaland done something similar in a Champions League game for Salzburg this season. Griezmann, for both Atletico Madrid and France, has been supremely defensively diligent in both situations where he drops off the main striker, and where he and his strike partner both drop and work on the same line shutting down the space between themselves and their midfield pair.

    Barcelona, Atletico, Valencia, Bayern, Dortmund, RB Leipzig, Juventus, Napoli, Benfica and Lyon all either play or have played a 4-4-2, or a 4-4-1-1, or 4-2-3-1, with very much a ‘forward’ rather than a ‘midfielder’ in that position in between the lead striker and the central midfielders, to varying extents, in the past two years. Recently both Leicester and Monaco built very successful seasons around shapes involving two attackers while playing in wildly different ways. Eintracht Frankfurt last year were the same, playing with both Haller and Jovic up front. Salzburg are generally giving a good account of themselves this season and, though it doesn’t look like they particularly stick to a certain formation, they tend to use a front two and very attacking support options. Our last two league opponents both use a 4-4-2. This is not merely a theoretical concept, but a practical set up which has been, and will continue to be, used abundantly.


    So do you think you could set out Scholes’ lineup before a game and tell them you were playing a 4-4-1-1, and then at half time inform them that the formation was changing to a 4-2-3-1 and they would all understand these little changes in position and in what they’re supposed to be looking to do?

    It’s all such basic, generic rubbish.

    A centre midfielder should get in the box like Scholes used to do. Well, Scholes never played alongside another midfielder who got in the box like he used to - so was Keane not doing his job properly? Or, since a 4-4-1-1 consists of ‘centre midfielders’ and a 4-2-3-1 uses ‘defensive midfielders’, is there another formation which uses one ‘centre midfielder’ and one ‘defensive midfielder’ in a two-man midfield? What was Pirlo? Can you acknowledge the difference in how Vieira interpreted his role depending on whether he played with Gilberto Silva or Edu?

    Attacking midfielder or second striker - Ballack? Lampard? Guily? Boateng? Van De Beek? Vidal? Bergkamp? Many players don’t fit your broad, sweeping descriptions.

    Is there another formation for using wide attacking midfielders with a second striker? Or one for using wingers with an attacking midfielder?

    It’s all nonsense. A player’s position does not determine that player’s abilities and tendencies.
  37. Nov 11, 2019 at 02:03
    #37

    thepolice123 Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    9,580
    I have no doubts Rashford can carry out defensive tactical instructions. The attacking side is the main problem because Rashford is not a second striker. His decision-making and passing are also not good enough to play in a deeper role. He is a different player compared to Rooney and Tevez who are pure second strikers and have always played behind the main forward throughout their careers. So its not really a valid comparison.

    We can implement strategies for him to drift left but this requires alot of running and really begs the question what kind of player are we going to play on that left midfield role.
  38. Nov 11, 2019 at 05:40
    #38

    Sky1981 Fending off the urge

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    22,846
    Location:
    Under the bright neon lights of sincity
    Potato potahto

    Anyone could make a hypothetical lineup. The devil's in the details
  39. Nov 11, 2019 at 06:20
    #39

    SadlerMUFC Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2017
    Messages:
    2,143
    Location:
    Niagara Falls, Canada
    I think they both have it right depending on who we are playing. Even under SAF, we had our 4-4-2, but when it came to a tough game we often played a 4-5-1. So I would look at Scholes' formation for the majority of the games, and some sort of variation on a back 5 for the tougher matches. Mind you, I wouldn't keep James out of the starting XI for either formation. Perhaps in a back 5 (or 3, whatever you want to call it) I would put AWB beside Maguire at RCD and play James as a WB/FB down the right. The problem with the back 5 in Hargraeves formation is that our width is coming from AWB and as great as he has been defensively, he offers very little in attack...
  40. Nov 11, 2019 at 08:09
    #40

    Needham Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2013
    Messages:
    10,399
    Well done Hargreaves on not getting injured during the video.