Scottish Football 2025-26 | boooooo

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought Hearts would want to build around him
 
If Shankland goes to Rangers that would just be the perfect way to complete a shitty end to the season. Feck sake.

Edit: It's being reported as a free transfer too, ffs.
 
Crazy, seeing online it says when he signed his new deal at Hearts it included a break clause after 12 months so he could leave on a free.
 
Enjoyed this from the SPFL:

Two Celtic games are among five being investigated by the SPFL while the Scottish FA's key match incident panel suggests the Premiership champions should not have had a penalty against Motherwell.

Spectators entered the pitch following late goals at Motherwell on 13 May and at home to Hearts on 16 May as Celtic won their final two league fixtures of the season to retain the title.
"In recent seasons, there have been a number of incidents at SPFL matches where objects have been thrown at players or members of staff, orchestrated pyrotechnic displays have taken place, and/or mass pitch incursions have occurred," the SPFL said in a statement.

"In season 2025-26 the SPFL concluded 11 disciplinary processes against eight clubs for such incidents.

"These statistics do not include the final match days of the season and the SPFL can confirm that the [matches being investigated] are being investigated under SPFL Rules H36 and H37.

"In addition to these disciplinary processes, there is a continuing need for all stakeholders to work together to address the challenges of unacceptable conduct at matches, including pitch encroachments and pyrotechnic use.

"The SPFL has engaged fully in the Scottish government's consultation on football banning orders and awaits the next steps in that process."

"In recent seasons"? Perhaps this shows that you haven't done enough and aren't doing enough if these incidents are still happening?
 
If Shankland goes to Rangers that would just be the perfect way to complete a shitty end to the season. Feck sake.

Edit: It's being reported as a free transfer too, ffs.
From the BBC:

People with knowledge of the negotiations are being coy about what Rangers are paying Hearts for Shankland. Both sides are not comfortable talking about a supposed break clause in Shankland's Hearts contract that would allow him to leave for nothing, a scenario that would, no doubt, infuriate Hearts fans even further.

Losing their captain and principal scorer is bad enough but losing him for little or no money might be deemed insult added to injury. Right now, the phrases being used are 'undisclosed fee' and 'Rangers paid the required amount'.
 
What kind of clause could there even be in a contract that lets a club's captain and best player leave for free to an immediate rival? Who gives out contracts like that?
 
What kind of clause could there even be in a contract that lets a club's captain and best player leave for free to an immediate rival? Who gives out contracts like that?
A club that's desperate to keep a player.
 
Except it sounds like the clause accomplishes the total opposite.

Kind of, but his contract was going to expire last summer so I imagine it was the only chance they had of keeping him. Bold but nearly paid off for them with a title win. Should have if the refs were competent.
 
Not beyond the realms of possibility Rangers are below Hearts again next season, so even bigger decision for Shankland. I’d trust a Tong Bloom lead operation more than the clowns at Rangers.
 
Wait, I was told I was being stupid for saying that this year was the once in a generation moment and normal Old Firm dominance would likely resume from next season onward. I was called a fool for even suggesting that Hearts won't have their players snatched by the two Glasgow teams this summer.

I'm confused. Because clearly I was just an idiot and couldn't see that this season wasn't just a one off if Hearts lost the title and it was still great for the league. The person that said that seems to have gone very quiet though so who knows...
 
Wait, I was told I was being stupid for saying that this year was the once in a generation moment and normal Old Firm dominance would likely resume from next season onward. I was called a fool for even suggesting that Hearts won't have their players snatched by the two Glasgow teams this summer.

I'm confused. Because clearly I was just an idiot and couldn't see that this season wasn't just a one off if Hearts lost the title and it was still great for the league. The person that said that seems to have gone very quiet though so who knows...
I think that’s why the events of the last few weeks have provoked so much disgust. This was THE chance for it to happen, and it should have happened. Now here we are, season barely over and that’s Hearts talisman already agreed to jump ship to Rangers. Neither Rangers or Celtic will have two disastrous managerial appointments like that again. Still feel terrible for Hearts given the manner it was lost, but that was their chance. Short of some PL style oil type takeover we won’t see a non OF side that close again for a long time.
 
Wait, I was told I was being stupid for saying that this year was the once in a generation moment and normal Old Firm dominance would likely resume from next season onward. I was called a fool for even suggesting that Hearts won't have their players snatched by the two Glasgow teams this summer.

I'm confused. Because clearly I was just an idiot and couldn't see that this season wasn't just a one off if Hearts lost the title and it was still great for the league. The person that said that seems to have gone very quiet though so who knows...
Yeah speaking as a neutral, I followed the league more closely than I have in the past three decades.
 
Big blow for Hearts, good signing for Rangers. He'll do well for a couple of seasons.
 
Wait, I was told I was being stupid for saying that this year was the once in a generation moment and normal Old Firm dominance would likely resume from next season onward. I was called a fool for even suggesting that Hearts won't have their players snatched by the two Glasgow teams this summer.

I'm confused. Because clearly I was just an idiot and couldn't see that this season wasn't just a one off if Hearts lost the title and it was still great for the league. The person that said that seems to have gone very quiet though so who knows...
Not that you've been thinking about it or anything.
 
Not that you've been thinking about it or anything.
Of course I've been thinking about it, like I think about many things. That's the beauty of the human brain; the ability to think.

Right now I'm thinking if you think you've somehow negated my point.... I'm thinking "no."
 
Of course I've been thinking about it, like I think about many things. That's the beauty of the human brain; the ability to think.

Right now I'm thinking if you think you've somehow negated my point.... I'm thinking "no."
I wasn't even the one who disagreed with you in the first place :lol: relax.
 
I wasn't even the one who disagreed with you in the first place :lol: relax.
FFS dammit I was about to edit my post so I was less of a dickhead and you beat me to it :lol:

But yeah you're right. I should focus less on this and more on the sunburn I've got on the big bald spot at the top of my head that I forgot to put lotion on.
 
Crazy, seeing online it says when he signed his new deal at Hearts it included a break clause after 12 months so he could leave on a free.

31 in August so this is last pay day type deal.

Hearts got the data now to source a younger replacement.
 
Hearts are absolutely stupid for even agreeing to such a clause from both Shankland & his agent last summer.

They’ve had the rug pulled well under their feet & look like absolute idiots here.
 
Last edited:
Hearts are absolutely stupid for even agreeing to such a clause from both Shankland & his agent last summer.

They’ve had the rug pulled well under their feet & look like absolute idiots here.
He may have only signed the contract on the basis that clause was inserted. When a player is out of contract and in reasonable demand, he holds all the aces.
 
He may have only signed the contract on the basis that clause was inserted. When a player is out of contract and in reasonable demand, he holds all the aces.
I get what you mean mate. But if a club is happy to be held to ransom like that then it just comes across as they think the player is bigger than the club to be allowed to have a clause like that in the contract. Particularly when they announce it as a 3 year contract to begin with. A release clause of £3M-£4M would have been a complete different matter& understandable but for £0, it’s just made them look like idiots here and weak negotiators.

A 3 year contract was announced midway through their pre-season, when they were pleading for him to sign a new deal and he was trying to get himself a move away of the back of a poor season which showed no one was interested to sign him on a free contract then hence why he re-signed, but deep down it’s just a one year deal with the option of a 2 year contract.

If that was Hibs or Man Utd, I’d be dumbfounded and embarrassed by the hierarchy to have had the rug pulled from under their feet like that.
 
I get what you mean mate. But if a club is happy to be held to ransom like that then it just comes across as they think the player is bigger than the club to be allowed to have a clause like that in the contract. Particularly when they announce it as a 3 year contract to begin with. A release clause of £3M-£4M would have been a complete different matter& understandable but for £0, it’s just made them look like idiots here and weak negotiators.

A 3 year contract was announced midway through their pre-season, when they were pleading for him to sign a new deal and he was trying to get himself a move away of the back of a poor season which showed no one was interested to sign him on a free contract then hence why he re-signed, but deep down it’s just a one year deal with the option of a 2 year contract.

If that was Hibs or Man Utd, I’d be dumbfounded and embarrassed by the hierarchy to have had the rug pulled from under their feet like that.
I'm not embarrassed by this but I am disappointed.
The flip side to this is that many would have been angry if he hadn't signed because we refused the clause.
But overall, it's a kick when we're already down.
 
I get what you mean mate. But if a club is happy to be held to ransom like that then it just comes across as they think the player is bigger than the club to be allowed to have a clause like that in the contract. Particularly when they announce it as a 3 year contract to begin with. A release clause of £3M-£4M would have been a complete different matter& understandable but for £0, it’s just made them look like idiots here and weak negotiators.

A 3 year contract was announced midway through their pre-season, when they were pleading for him to sign a new deal and he was trying to get himself a move away of the back of a poor season which showed no one was interested to sign him on a free contract then hence why he re-signed, but deep down it’s just a one year deal with the option of a 2 year contract.

If that was Hibs or Man Utd, I’d be dumbfounded and embarrassed by the hierarchy to have had the rug pulled from under their feet like that.
I totally get your point mate and it has a lot of merit, but as Reiver said if he didn't because Hearts didn't put in the clause then their fans would be angry. It was a difficult situation and a classic case of the players holding the aces. That said, as u say, he did have a poor season the year before so maybe the interest, especially on the wages he'd have been looking for, may have been sparse. It was a tricky 1 for Hearts to be honest. They probably felt it was a risk worth taking as there was no guarantee Rangers would come in for him. He performed so well this season though that their interest was guaranteed. Good business for Rangers to get him on a free, to be fair.

Celtic heavily linked with Kasper Hogh for 10 million from Bodo Glimpt. Scored goals in CL against City and Atletico last season. Be a good signing for us. I'd imagine other clubs will be interested however.
 
I get what you mean mate. But if a club is happy to be held to ransom like that then it just comes across as they think the player is bigger than the club to be allowed to have a clause like that in the contract. Particularly when they announce it as a 3 year contract to begin with. A release clause of £3M-£4M would have been a complete different matter& understandable but for £0, it’s just made them look like idiots here and weak negotiators.

A 3 year contract was announced midway through their pre-season, when they were pleading for him to sign a new deal and he was trying to get himself a move away of the back of a poor season which showed no one was interested to sign him on a free contract then hence why he re-signed, but deep down it’s just a one year deal with the option of a 2 year contract.

If that was Hibs or Man Utd, I’d be dumbfounded and embarrassed by the hierarchy to have had the rug pulled from under their feet like that.
The Old Firm's income and ability to pay good wages are far ahead of the rest of the league. In that sense the other SPL clubs are in a far weaker position.

Edit:

I don't think many fans from England realise quite how far the gap is. I didn't. I dug out some stats from a BBC piece recently.

There is a big gap between the richest and poorest English Premier League clubs, but the amount of money involved in England means even a newly promoted Sunderland could spend ten times the net spend of Rangers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cje144nwejzo

Celtic's annual turnover for the 2025-26 season was £143.6m - nearly six times that of Hearts in the same time period.

Rangers had the second highest revenue last season at £94.2m, putting the gap between the Old Firm and Hearts - as the next highest-valued team - at nearly £70m.

The revenue gap between Celtic and the lowest turnover, Falkirk, is nearly £140m - with the Glasgow club bringing in more than 30 times as much money.

Rangers spent £37.8m in transfer fees this season and Celtic £13.5m. Hearts only spent £4.3m.

The full list of stadium capacities is as follows:

Celtic Park - 60,411

Ibrox (Rangers) - 50,817

Pittodire (Aberdeen) - 20,866

Easter Road (Hibernian) - 20,421

Tynecastle (Heart of Midlothian) - 19,852

Rugby Park (Kilmarnock) - 15,003

Tannadice (Dundee United) - 14,223

Fir Park (Motherwell) - 13,677

Dens Park (Dundee) - 11,775

Almondvale (Livingston) - 8,716

St Mirren Park - 7,937

Falkirk Stadium - 7,937
 
Last edited:
I'm not embarrassed by this but I am disappointed.
The flip side to this is that many would have been angry if he hadn't signed because we refused the clause.
But overall, it's a kick when we're already down.
Totally understand where you are coming from. There would have been a fan backlash (well moreso disgruntled fans than a backlash) if you never signed him for an additional season. But it just feels odd that it was announced as a 3 year deal which gives the indication that if he was to have the season he just had, you’d get some sort of money for him. Even like a million quid at worst. I know hindsight is a great thing but at that time if you never offered him those terms and he decided to walk away, then at your AGM informed your shareholderd/fans are informed why you never gave Shankland & his agent what they were wanting inserted into contract then surely your fans would have realised that the guy was primarily ready to f*** yous over at the first given opportunity. Last season he had put on a fair bit of weight & looked massively disinterested. It’s unsurprising no club didn’t take him then.
I totally get your point mate and it has a lot of merit, but as Reiver said if he didn't because Hearts didn't put in the clause then their fans would be angry. It was a difficult situation and a classic case of the players holding the aces. That said, as u say, he did have a poor season the year before so maybe the interest, especially on the wages he'd have been looking for, may have been sparse. It was a tricky 1 for Hearts to be honest. They probably felt it was a risk worth taking as there was no guarantee Rangers would come in for him. He performed so well this season though that their interest was guaranteed. Good business for Rangers to get him on a free, to be fair.

Celtic heavily linked with Kasper Hogh for 10 million from Bodo Glimpt. Scored goals in CL against City and Atletico last season. Be a good signing for us. I'd imagine other clubs will be interested however.
There was always the Shankland to Rangers story popping up every summer after the first two seasons at Hearts when he was scoring 20+ goals. I was surprised they didn’t sign him in summer 2024 but thought they would get him the next summer on a free but his form massively dipped that season and it didn’t look like a good move at that time. He’d put on a fair bit of weight as well and just looked a completely different player.

That would be some signing for you if you land him.
The Old Firm's income and ability to pay good wages are far ahead of the rest of the league. In that sense the other SPL clubs are in a far weaker position.

Edit:

I don't think many fans from England realise quite how far the gap is. I didn't. I dug out some stats from a BBC piece recently.

There is a big gap between the richest and poorest English Premier League clubs, but the amount of money involved in England means even a newly promoted Sunderland could spend ten times the net spend of Rangers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cje144nwejzo

Celtic's annual turnover for the 2025-26 season was £143.6m - nearly six times that of Hearts in the same time period.

Rangers had the second highest revenue last season at £94.2m, putting the gap between the Old Firm and Hearts - as the next highest-valued team - at nearly £70m.

The revenue gap between Celtic and the lowest turnover, Falkirk, is nearly £140m - with the Glasgow club bringing in more than 30 times as much money.

Rangers spent £37.8m in transfer fees this season and Celtic £13.5m. Hearts only spent £4.3m.

The full list of stadium capacities is as follows:

Celtic Park - 60,411

Ibrox (Rangers) - 50,817

Pittodire (Aberdeen) - 20,866

Easter Road (Hibernian) - 20,421

Tynecastle (Heart of Midlothian) - 19,852

Rugby Park (Kilmarnock) - 15,003

Tannadice (Dundee United) - 14,223

Fir Park (Motherwell) - 13,677

Dens Park (Dundee) - 11,775

Almondvale (Livingston) - 8,716

St Mirren Park - 7,937

Falkirk Stadium - 7,937

Yeah I know that the financial gulf between the OF & the rest is huge, in fact astronomical. That’s why Hearts winning the league would imo overtaken that Leicester City 2016 triumph as it’s a proper underdog story. Not saying Leicester’s isn’t but the Hearts one would have been on a different level altogether.

I’m a Hibs fan and grew up watching all our best players, particularly the younger talent getting taken by the OF in the mid 2000’s (Tony Mowbray’s teenage kicks) so know that feeling pretty well. Although those times have sort of changed now as many Scottish players (the younger ones in particular) tend to favour a move to Serie A as the Italian clubs have seen there is a market there for them to tap into with good value for money. Plus moving to a much better league and higher standard to go really test yourself in a brand new environment both on & off the pitch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.