Bola
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,205
My rugby reference is to their rigid structure, dull play, physicality and a little bit of dirty playAnd wolves have ident
tiical quality of players to Burnley? Do you SERIOUSLY believe that?
and I reckon Fulham would have if they hadn't made the mistake of whole scale changes in the summer. [/Quite]
Dude. Fulham made us look like a free flowing attacking side WHILST managed by Mourinho...
Im sorry. But is extremely fallacious to paint them as a super dirty team. They are not.
Ok wolves have better players, so perhaps a better about would be the cherries. Similar resources, very different football and they are now an established prem team. I know who I would rather watch.
End of the day it boils down to what you want as a fan (fan of the game, or fan of the club). The Stoke and Burnley was can be effective, but it is little more than existing, I'd rather a team takes a bit of a gamble and play football how it should be played (fun and entertaining)