gaffs
Full Member
Burnley fans must be so conflicted with Jaidon Anthony right now.
If it wasn't for the fact he has just been brought on, I'm sure Scott Parker would have subbed him off for taking such a low xG shot!
Burnley fans must be so conflicted with Jaidon Anthony right now.
You said 0.03. That is 3 out of every hundred. It is also a complete nonsense way of looking at it because some players are better at shooting than others. He clearly has a talent for that type of shot. If he had that chance 1000 times you would have to be a complete fool to think he would only score 3 of them.
Yes players sometimes go close and don't manage to score. That doesn't mean they were wrong to try.
By your logic, every shot that doesn’t go in is useless and a waste of time. How else is a player meant to score if he doesn’t shoot? No player in the world has 100% conversion rate.Capable of not scoring? We've got tons of those unfortunately.
It was a wonderful effort, I don't deny that, but it gained us nothing. 2 players were free in the box at the time the shot was taken, finding them would have been the option more likely to result in a goal.
There are posters suggesting he's the most exciting academy player in a decade on this thread, based on a short cameo that consisted of 7 touches, 3 passes, and 2 shots off target. Nothing else. That's the kind of hyperbole I'm trying to balance out.
I understand the rush of blood, but you definitely can blame him. Corner flag or just past the post, a missed shot from miles away when we're chasing the game is a bad thing, especially when we looked so dangerous crossing the ball all game.
The first effort wasn't unlucky, it had an xG of 0.03, it was extremely unlikely to result in a goal. If he scores, it's worth it, but he had better options in the area.
I don't want to be too harsh on the lad but there's a lot of hyperbole and gassing him up in this thread, so we need to keep in mind that his only contributions in this cameo were 3 passes and 2 off target shots, with better passing options available, that had a total xG of 0.04.
Cutting in on his left and scoring curlers is something he's known for and he got great power on both of them today reasonable direction on the second and a rizla paper away with the 1st. It's fair to say he knows how to cut in and strike a ball.You're correct, it's 3 times in every hundred. I was sloppy in my frustration saying thousand.
You state that Lacey has a talent for that type of shot, what are you basing that on? The two he took tonight, that both missed? He took similar one against Villa, that was an easy catch for Martinez. Where's the evidence of him scoring at an above average rate with them?
You're right that players going close and not scoring doesn't mean they were wrong to try. That depends on the circumstances. In this case, Sesko and Dalot were an easy pass away in the box, they would have been better options.
It’s as if @The Hilton doesn’t know anything about the player or the club he plays for…Cutting in on his left and scoring curlers is something he's known for and he got great power on both of them today reasonable direction on the second and a rizla paper away with the 1st. It's fair to say he knows how to cut in and strike a ball.
Anyway this is boring. Enjoy whatever it is you're trying to do here.
By your logic, every shot that doesn’t go in is useless and a waste of time. How else is a player meant to score if he doesn’t shoot? No player in the world has 100% conversion rate.
Put down your weapons and stop trying to fight a terrible point you’ve tried to make.
By your logic, every shot that doesn’t go in is useless and a waste of time. How else is a player meant to score if he doesn’t shoot? No player in the world has 100% conversion rate.
Put down your weapons and stop trying to fight a terrible point you’ve tried to make.
It’s as if @The Hilton doesn’t know anything about the player or the club he plays for…
Honestly it would be strange if he didn't. He's a tiny, left-footed RW. Seems like the exact type of player you'd most think would be above average accuracy from that sort of position.You state that Lacey has a talent for that type of shot, what are you basing that on?
That isn't my logic, you've strawmanned my argument. The logic is this - low percentage shots taken, when teammates are in more dangerous positions and a pass is on to take advantage (be it setting up a cross to someone free in the box, or, in this case, a simple ball in to Sesko's feet), are the wrong decision if they don't result in a goal.
Cutting in on his left and scoring curlers is something he's known for and he got great power on both of them today reasonable direction on the second and a rizla paper away with the 1st. It's fair to say he knows how to cut in and strike a ball.
Anyway this is boring. Enjoy whatever it is you're trying to do here.
It’s as if @The Hilton doesn’t know anything about the player or the club he plays for…
And that's how you end up with a team full of players that lack courage and conviction to make things happen and instead look for the low risk, safe option.
More cutbacks from Jim Ratty then?Lad is full of beans and confidence! Be interesting to see if Fletch starts him on Sunday
No, that's how you end up with a team of players that don't waste promising opportunities with low percentage efforts, and instead take the high reward, more efficient option.
And what's the low percentage, more efficient option - running at players, or a sideways pass to someone in space. Crossing a ball or cutting back and playing the ball to your fullback.
Bruno is far and away our most productive player and he has built a career on trying to create things, regardless of xA or other nonsense. Trying to curb that just makes you more pedestrian.
If he had a wild shot from a tight angle rather than lay off a pass to a player who was open in front of goal, sure, it would be a poor decision. But a winger cutting into space and working an opening within shooting range is exactly the type of situation where we should be expecting them to shoot.
Bruno regularly gets slated for trying low probability ‘Hollywood’ passes and conceding possession, in fairness.
True, but while sometimes he does it in daft situations or executes them badly, can you imagine how bad we would be without it. If he started looking for the safe option every time we'd lack any sort of creativity.
I'm with @Stobzilla . I get your thinking but you never know. He could take to his first start like a duck to water. Think Rashford vs that team I can't spell and Arsenal, Januzaj vs Sunderland, Mainoo vs Everton. And if he does, it'll be a huge boost to know that we have a player like him in the squad that can be relied upon if needed.I'd bring him on and give him more minutes. No need to rush him. But based on the limited amount of time he's had so far, he's deserves to be in the rotation.
He plays with that fearlessness you want from a confident youngster.
(And hopefully in time he'll iron out those pesky shots at goal and learn not to try and make things happen and will simply pass it to Dalot for one of his deadly crosses).
Young lad comes on, inches away from winning the game with a worldie and we have to read posts about the xG of his shot. FFS.

I don't know much about xG or xA or any other stats that may or may not be useful. I know that they negatively impact my personal enjoyment of the game by reducing the variety of shots and goals which is extremely important for my entertainment. So, I'm glad Lacey went for it, in both situations.That isn't my logic, you've strawmanned my argument. The logic is this - low percentage shots taken, when teammates are in more dangerous positions and a pass is on to take advantage (be it setting up a cross to someone free in the box, or, in this case, a simple ball in to Sesko's feet), are the wrong decision if they don't result in a goal.
Tinfoil hat firmly on, it felt like making another point after Amorim refused to give him minutes at the start and the media gave him shit for itThe fact that Amorim put Fletcher and mantato or whatever his name is out there on the right instead of him just seems ridic
I think that Amorim was aware that the end was close and decided to give Mantato his debut. Players remember the manager that give them their debuts.The fact that Amorim put Fletcher and mantato or whatever his name is out there on the right instead of him just seems ridic
I don't know much about xG or xA or any other stats that may or may not be useful. I know that they negatively impact my personal enjoyment of the game by reducing the variety of shots and goals which is extremely important for my entertainment. So, I'm glad Lacey went for it, in both situations.
What doesn't make sense to me, is that you assume teammates who are in dangerous positions but do not have the ball have a higher xG. In my uneducated opinion you would need to first factor in the xWhatever of the pass/cross to them. And then based on the outcome of that pass/cross, you'd only be able to determine the xG of the receiving player when he has the ball under control and is able to shoot. This is not even considering that both Utd and Burnley players are constantly moving. Your reasoning is based on static information for a dynamic situation, so imo flawed.
And what's the low percentage, more efficient option - running at players, or a sideways pass to someone in space. Crossing a ball or cutting back and playing the ball to your fullback.
Bruno is far and away our most productive player and he has built a career on trying to create things, regardless of xA or other nonsense. Trying to curb that just makes you more pedestrian.
If he had a wild shot from a tight angle rather than lay off a pass to a player who was open in front of goal, sure, it would be a poor decision. But a winger cutting into space and working an opening within shooting range is exactly the type of situation where we should be expecting them to shoot.
I understand the rush of blood, but you definitely can blame him. Corner flag or just past the post, a missed shot from miles away when we're chasing the game is a bad thing, especially when we looked so dangerous crossing the ball all game.
The first effort wasn't unlucky, it had an xG of 0.03, it was extremely unlikely to result in a goal. If he scores, it's worth it, but he had better options in the area.
I don't want to be too harsh on the lad but there's a lot of hyperbole and gassing him up in this thread, so we need to keep in mind that his only contributions in this cameo were 3 passes and 2 off target shots, with better passing options available, that had a total xG of 0.04.

Bruno gets absolutely hammered on here for shooting wastefully and ignoring better placed teammates when we're chasing a game, and that's despite him being orders of magnitude more accomplished at shooting and scoring at this level.
I'd be more annoyed at Bruno in this situation, as with his experience and vision he should know better. It's much more forgivable by Lacey, but that doesn't change that shooting here was the wrong decision.
Yeah that’s fair.
I guess there’s two different concepts at play here. If, after 10 or 20 games it turns out that every time Lacey gets the ball he immediately tries to smash it in the top corner from 40 yards then obviously you’d want someone to have a word with him about picking the most effective choice for the good of the team. But he can hardly be blamed for having a go at it tonight.
Did you not hear the commentators say that move was his trademark move, and Darren Fletcher mentioned that too. If Bruno did the exact same thing and smashed the post I'd have no complaints, I'd probably think "nice turn of pace"
A young player coming into the team with no fear getting people off their seats, what more can you ask for.