Sir Jim Ratcliffe: I want to buy Manchester United | Will make a bid for the club [Telegraph]

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
Ratcliffe would almost certainly need to leverage/finance his bid through borrowing
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,545
Location
Somewhere out there
People keep talking about his wealth as though he’ll be buying the club himself.
Let’s make this clear, if they make a bid, it’ll be INEOS that make it, a company with a valuation of over 60 billion.
They can absolutely afford to buy the club and invest in infrastructure.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
12,556
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
I really don't want this guy, not sure how he will be any different
Yeah me neither
He won’t leverage against the club, so the debt will be gone and so will the debt payments. He is also very unlikely to take dividends from the club. The club can stand on its own feet and we will finally have a level playing field. It can’t be understated how massive that would be for the club.
Ratcliffe would almost certainly need to leverage/finance his bid through borrowing
As would other buyers - including oil money.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,337
I have a contact in the game. He seemed very confident it will be Radcliffe buying United. He’s reliable but you know things can change in football.
Praying he has learnt from mistakes at NICE like leaving Brailsford there for a start
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,337
Some simply want to swim non stop in a pool of misery. If there’s a negative angle to find, they’ll find it.
He has been shown to make a mess of things,there is nothing wrong with having concerns about him doing it here too.
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,334
I don’t really understand how this Ratcliffe fella has gone down in everyone’s estimation.

feck me he was on the front of banners at a protest a few weeks ago being urged to buy us, now he’s UK Glazer.

I know it sounds simplistic and I know it’s not as simplistic as this but from what I read he’s fecking minted, his company Ineos are minted(woth 60+billion, Ratcliffe 10.5 billion)surely he just needs to put up the 4-5 billion( and that’s a figure plucked out of my arse, just like the 8-10 billion some are quoting because nobody really knows), sort out the ground and training facilities for another couple of billion(again heavy arse plucking here…oo er missus)then we’re pretty self sufficient no?

Are people getting delusions of grandeur with this whole Middle Eastern thing or what? These figures are off the top of my head and some basic Googling.

City we’re bought for £200 million and spent ish £1.5 billion or there abouts (and Silver lake investors have bought 18% of the club)
Newcastle £305 million(20% owned by PCP Capital partners)
PSG bought for €70 million and spent €1.03 billion or there abouts(and I’ve read somewhere that they’re looking for some outside investment)

So why am I hearing that these Middle Eastern countries are the holy grail for our club? Yeah they’ve got a feck ton of cash but have they ever spent billions acquiring a club? Doesn’t seem so, ok they’ve invested heavily during they’re ownership’s (Newcastle is a wait and see)

What I’m trying to say is if Ratcliffe/Ineos/some other partner buy us for 4-5 billion initially would they really need to spend another 1-2 billion on players to get to where City and PSG are now? everyone keeps crapping on about how we’re self sufficient.

We could potentially have an owner who is a United fan, is from Manchester, with an % of external investment and is A LOT richer than the Glazers.

What’s not to love right? Is this not the holy grail? What am I missing here?

I’m excited and worried for the future of our club in equal measure right now I just want the Glazers gone and everyone else feels like our saviours without really knowing what the actual feck is going to happen (if it actually does happen)
 

Ciddy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
185
I don’t really understand how this Ratcliffe fella has gone down in everyone’s estimation.

feck me he was on the front of banners at a protest a few weeks ago being urged to buy us, now he’s UK Glazer.

I know it sounds simplistic and I know it’s not as simplistic as this but from what I read he’s fecking minted, his company Ineos are minted(woth 60+billion, Ratcliffe 10.5 billion)surely he just needs to put up the 4-5 billion( and that’s a figure plucked out of my arse, just like the 8-10 billion some are quoting because nobody really knows), sort out the ground and training facilities for another couple of billion(again heavy arse plucking here…oo er missus)then we’re pretty self sufficient no?

Are people getting delusions of grandeur with this whole Middle Eastern thing or what? These figures are off the top of my head and some basic Googling.

City we’re bought for £200 million and spent ish £1.5 billion or there abouts (and Silver lake investors have bought 18% of the club)
Newcastle £305 million(20% owned by PCP Capital partners)
PSG bought for €70 million and spent €1.03 billion or there abouts(and I’ve read somewhere that they’re looking for some outside investment)

So why am I hearing that these Middle Eastern countries are the holy grail for our club? Yeah they’ve got a feck ton of cash but have they ever spent billions acquiring a club? Doesn’t seem so, ok they’ve invested heavily during they’re ownership’s (Newcastle is a wait and see)

What I’m trying to say is if Ratcliffe/Ineos/some other partner buy us for 4-5 billion initially would they really need to spend another 1-2 billion on players to get to where City and PSG are now? everyone keeps crapping on about how we’re self sufficient.

We could potentially have an owner who is a United fan, is from Manchester, with an % of external investment and is A LOT richer than the Glazers.

What’s not to love right? Is this not the holy grail? What am I missing here?

I’m excited and worried for the future of our club in equal measure right now I just want the Glazers gone and everyone else feels like our saviours without really knowing what the actual feck is going to happen (if it actually does happen)
speaking too much sense for some I think. I’ve seen people suggesting the stadium needs £1B, the training ground needs £1B and then the expectation that we need billions for transfers. The best stadiums in the world haven’t cost that much and training grounds certainly don’t. Just removing the debt alone will be a massive influx of money.
I believe some form of FFP still exists so we couldn’t and I’m sure, wouldn’t go out all of a sudden and spend £500M every window.
INEOS with their connections could bring in plenty of money to improve everything required. I’d much rather us go down this route than become another oil money play thing used for bragging rights.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,871
People keep talking about his wealth as though he’ll be buying the club himself.
Let’s make this clear, if they make a bid, it’ll be INEOS that make it, a company with a valuation of over 60 billion.
They can absolutely afford to buy the club and invest in infrastructure.
He said that himself when he looked into buying before a few months ago. Ineos will be the owners officially if he does buy.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,446
Location
Manchester
I don’t really understand how this Ratcliffe fella has gone down in everyone’s estimation.

feck me he was on the front of banners at a protest a few weeks ago being urged to buy us, now he’s UK Glazer.

I know it sounds simplistic and I know it’s not as simplistic as this but from what I read he’s fecking minted, his company Ineos are minted(woth 60+billion, Ratcliffe 10.5 billion)surely he just needs to put up the 4-5 billion( and that’s a figure plucked out of my arse, just like the 8-10 billion some are quoting because nobody really knows), sort out the ground and training facilities for another couple of billion(again heavy arse plucking here…oo er missus)then we’re pretty self sufficient no?

Are people getting delusions of grandeur with this whole Middle Eastern thing or what? These figures are off the top of my head and some basic Googling.

City we’re bought for £200 million and spent ish £1.5 billion or there abouts (and Silver lake investors have bought 18% of the club)
Newcastle £305 million(20% owned by PCP Capital partners)
PSG bought for €70 million and spent €1.03 billion or there abouts(and I’ve read somewhere that they’re looking for some outside investment)

So why am I hearing that these Middle Eastern countries are the holy grail for our club? Yeah they’ve got a feck ton of cash but have they ever spent billions acquiring a club? Doesn’t seem so, ok they’ve invested heavily during they’re ownership’s (Newcastle is a wait and see)

What I’m trying to say is if Ratcliffe/Ineos/some other partner buy us for 4-5 billion initially would they really need to spend another 1-2 billion on players to get to where City and PSG are now? everyone keeps crapping on about how we’re self sufficient.

We could potentially have an owner who is a United fan, is from Manchester, with an % of external investment and is A LOT richer than the Glazers.

What’s not to love right? Is this not the holy grail? What am I missing here?

I’m excited and worried for the future of our club in equal measure right now I just want the Glazers gone and everyone else feels like our saviours without really knowing what the actual feck is going to happen (if it actually does happen)
Good post.

Quite rare in here at the moment.
 

strandty

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
1,552
speaking too much sense for some I think. I’ve seen people suggesting the stadium needs £1B, the training ground needs £1B and then the expectation that we need billions for transfers. The best stadiums in the world haven’t cost that much and training grounds certainly don’t. Just removing the debt alone will be a massive influx of money.
I believe some form of FFP still exists so we couldn’t and I’m sure, wouldn’t go out all of a sudden and spend £500M every window.
INEOS with their connections could bring in plenty of money to improve everything required. I’d much rather us go down this route than become another oil money play thing used for bragging rights.
Was a very good post! Leicester’s training complex is meant to be up there as one of the best in the world and cost £100m. Some people do massively overstate costs to try prove points
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
88,607
Location
Centreback
Lets face it, all we can hope for is the least shit buyer. That might be INEOS but we have no say sadly.

Glazers will sell to the highest b8dder.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,314
Location
Birmingham
Hope any bid that doesn't guarantee significant investment in infrastructure is not considered.
 

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
I don’t really understand how this Ratcliffe fella has gone down in everyone’s estimation.

feck me he was on the front of banners at a protest a few weeks ago being urged to buy us, now he’s UK Glazer.

I know it sounds simplistic and I know it’s not as simplistic as this but from what I read he’s fecking minted, his company Ineos are minted(woth 60+billion, Ratcliffe 10.5 billion)surely he just needs to put up the 4-5 billion( and that’s a figure plucked out of my arse, just like the 8-10 billion some are quoting because nobody really knows), sort out the ground and training facilities for another couple of billion(again heavy arse plucking here…oo er missus)then we’re pretty self sufficient no?

Are people getting delusions of grandeur with this whole Middle Eastern thing or what? These figures are off the top of my head and some basic Googling.

City we’re bought for £200 million and spent ish £1.5 billion or there abouts (and Silver lake investors have bought 18% of the club)
Newcastle £305 million(20% owned by PCP Capital partners)
PSG bought for €70 million and spent €1.03 billion or there abouts(and I’ve read somewhere that they’re looking for some outside investment)

So why am I hearing that these Middle Eastern countries are the holy grail for our club? Yeah they’ve got a feck ton of cash but have they ever spent billions acquiring a club? Doesn’t seem so, ok they’ve invested heavily during they’re ownership’s (Newcastle is a wait and see)

What I’m trying to say is if Ratcliffe/Ineos/some other partner buy us for 4-5 billion initially would they really need to spend another 1-2 billion on players to get to where City and PSG are now? everyone keeps crapping on about how we’re self sufficient.

We could potentially have an owner who is a United fan, is from Manchester, with an % of external investment and is A LOT richer than the Glazers.

What’s not to love right? Is this not the holy grail? What am I missing here?

I’m excited and worried for the future of our club in equal measure right now I just want the Glazers gone and everyone else feels like our saviours without really knowing what the actual feck is going to happen (if it actually does happen)
Yup. It’s almost certain that INEOS would be the least bad of the confirmed interested parties, although obviously we don’t know anything of others who may be circling.

It’s not perfect, but on the face of it, it’s the best option.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
14,888
Location
Salford
I don’t really understand how this Ratcliffe fella has gone down in everyone’s estimation.

feck me he was on the front of banners at a protest a few weeks ago being urged to buy us, now he’s UK Glazer.

I know it sounds simplistic and I know it’s not as simplistic as this but from what I read he’s fecking minted, his company Ineos are minted(woth 60+billion, Ratcliffe 10.5 billion)surely he just needs to put up the 4-5 billion( and that’s a figure plucked out of my arse, just like the 8-10 billion some are quoting because nobody really knows), sort out the ground and training facilities for another couple of billion(again heavy arse plucking here…oo er missus)then we’re pretty self sufficient no?

Are people getting delusions of grandeur with this whole Middle Eastern thing or what? These figures are off the top of my head and some basic Googling.

City we’re bought for £200 million and spent ish £1.5 billion or there abouts (and Silver lake investors have bought 18% of the club)
Newcastle £305 million(20% owned by PCP Capital partners)
PSG bought for €70 million and spent €1.03 billion or there abouts(and I’ve read somewhere that they’re looking for some outside investment)

So why am I hearing that these Middle Eastern countries are the holy grail for our club? Yeah they’ve got a feck ton of cash but have they ever spent billions acquiring a club? Doesn’t seem so, ok they’ve invested heavily during they’re ownership’s (Newcastle is a wait and see)

What I’m trying to say is if Ratcliffe/Ineos/some other partner buy us for 4-5 billion initially would they really need to spend another 1-2 billion on players to get to where City and PSG are now? everyone keeps crapping on about how we’re self sufficient.

We could potentially have an owner who is a United fan, is from Manchester, with an % of external investment and is A LOT richer than the Glazers.

What’s not to love right? Is this not the holy grail? What am I missing here?

I’m excited and worried for the future of our club in equal measure right now I just want the Glazers gone and everyone else feels like our saviours without really knowing what the actual feck is going to happen (if it actually does happen)
Good points.

I think people are just getting excited at the idea of oil money

Ratcliffe would likely attend games, be aware of what the supporters want, invest in the facilities and team, and allow United to spend their own money on players (which alone would mean we could sign pretty much anyone) and very likely wouldn’t take any dividends
 

We need an rvn

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
3,867
Location
Down south...somewhere
Hope any bid that doesn't guarantee significant investment in infrastructure is not considered.
I don’t think the glazers care one iota about what any bid will guarantee - it will go to the highest bidder and they want to make the most money from the sale, simple as that really - don’t you think?

I applaud you for the positives vibes and thoughts though
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,047
Oil money = success.

Anything else is risky imo. Could go either way.
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
13,978
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
I don’t really understand how this Ratcliffe fella has gone down in everyone’s estimation.

feck me he was on the front of banners at a protest a few weeks ago being urged to buy us, now he’s UK Glazer.

I know it sounds simplistic and I know it’s not as simplistic as this but from what I read he’s fecking minted, his company Ineos are minted(woth 60+billion, Ratcliffe 10.5 billion)surely he just needs to put up the 4-5 billion( and that’s a figure plucked out of my arse, just like the 8-10 billion some are quoting because nobody really knows), sort out the ground and training facilities for another couple of billion(again heavy arse plucking here…oo er missus)then we’re pretty self sufficient no?

Are people getting delusions of grandeur with this whole Middle Eastern thing or what? These figures are off the top of my head and some basic Googling.

City we’re bought for £200 million and spent ish £1.5 billion or there abouts (and Silver lake investors have bought 18% of the club)
Newcastle £305 million(20% owned by PCP Capital partners)
PSG bought for €70 million and spent €1.03 billion or there abouts(and I’ve read somewhere that they’re looking for some outside investment)

So why am I hearing that these Middle Eastern countries are the holy grail for our club? Yeah they’ve got a feck ton of cash but have they ever spent billions acquiring a club? Doesn’t seem so, ok they’ve invested heavily during they’re ownership’s (Newcastle is a wait and see)

What I’m trying to say is if Ratcliffe/Ineos/some other partner buy us for 4-5 billion initially would they really need to spend another 1-2 billion on players to get to where City and PSG are now? everyone keeps crapping on about how we’re self sufficient.

We could potentially have an owner who is a United fan, is from Manchester, with an % of external investment and is A LOT richer than the Glazers.

What’s not to love right? Is this not the holy grail? What am I missing here?

I’m excited and worried for the future of our club in equal measure right now I just want the Glazers gone and everyone else feels like our saviours without really knowing what the actual feck is going to happen (if it actually does happen)
Hear hear!
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
12,556
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Oil money = success.

Anything else is risky imo. Could go either way.
Oil money doesn’t guarantee success. Neither City or PSG have won the CL despite billions spent, and that is the ultimate stated aim of both ‘projects’.

Also we’ve beaten Financially doped City to the league under Sir Alex, we’ve knocked PSG out of the CL in recent years. Oil money isn’t a path we need to follow.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,047
Oil money doesn’t guarantee success. Neither City or PSG have won the CL despite billions spent, and that is the ultimate stated aim of both ‘projects’.
Objectively speaking City have been pretty much perfect or near enough since they’ve been taken over. A cup competition is always going to go against you more often than not. Look at the infrastructure at that club. It’s unbelievable.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
42,729
I don’t really understand how this Ratcliffe fella has gone down in everyone’s estimation.

feck me he was on the front of banners at a protest a few weeks ago being urged to buy us, now he’s UK Glazer.
His Nice have gone nowhere. And back then we were desperate because it looked like the glazers would never feck off.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
12,556
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Objectively speaking City have been pretty much perfect or near enough since they’ve been taken over. A cup competition is always going to go against you more often than not. Look at the infrastructure at that club. It’s unbelievable.
It’s an infrastructure they bought from prime Barca. Hardly an achievement.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,047
It’s an infrastructure they bought from prime Barca. Hardly an achievement.
It doesn’t matter how they got it. They have it. They’ve transformed that area of Manchester. We need the same. This club needs to be transformed into the modern age.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,400
I have a contact in the game. He seemed very confident it will be Radcliffe buying United. He’s reliable but you know things can change in football.
I find it hard to see how anyone can be confident of this given the number of possible suitors.
 

LUHGForeva

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 26, 2022
Messages
4
Sir Jim would probably be the best owner we can get because he is a Man Utd fan.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,446
Location
Dublin, Ireland
speaking too much sense for some I think. I’ve seen people suggesting the stadium needs £1B, the training ground needs £1B and then the expectation that we need billions for transfers. The best stadiums in the world haven’t cost that much and training grounds certainly don’t. Just removing the debt alone will be a massive influx of money.
I believe some form of FFP still exists so we couldn’t and I’m sure, wouldn’t go out all of a sudden and spend £500M every window.
INEOS with their connections could bring in plenty of money to improve everything required. I’d much rather us go down this route than become another oil money play thing used for bragging rights.
Wembley cost 1bn and the price off materials has since skyrocketed
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
Wembley cost 1bn and the price off materials has since skyrocketed
Tbf most of Wembleys price probably went into somebodys back pocket :lol:

But yes it won't be cheap.

How much was the Spurs stadium?
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,047
Tbf most of Wembleys price probably went into somebodys back pocket :lol:

But yes it won't be cheap.

How much was the Spurs stadium?
Around the same I think.

Having a Middle East owner would mean things are done with haste. No messing about. I wouldn’t be so sure that would be the case with Western owners.