Sam
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2007
- Messages
- 31,585
And so they should be. It's a terrific signing.I'd say the majority are in favour.
And so they should be. It's a terrific signing.I'd say the majority are in favour.
Assume nothing !!! they are simply just spoilt idiots with no clueI can only assume those that think this guy is average or not good enough, haven't seen much of him.
A great player and like I said in the transfer forum, his contribution this coming season will be bigger than that of Ryan the Rascal!
SAF, give us a Keano or Scholes type player and let's get the season started..... with De Gea obviously.
Maybe he is reading your post, and that's what he actually sees? Stuff about agents not being black, claims that posters aren't racist, but are, but aren't. He also seems to think that all items of clothing are called Blazers. The educated guess bit could be a hidden truth about his lack of an education, resulting in constant guesswork on his part, which also explains why he completely misunderstood your post, twice.
I'm still confused if I'm honest. Maybe it was a cry for help - just to clarify I am not SCOPE or the MIND foundation, please contact your nearest charity.
Not me.
Is this a reference to the thread you bumped? Because none of those posters have posted in this thread...I have more of an issue with those who claimed he was shite and nowhere near Utd quality just a few short months ago and now are suddenly big fans of the player
Yes that's probably it, he's the only person in the world for and against apartheid and also presumably calls suits 'track-wear' and jeans 'cordroys' and cars wheeled-dragon-vessels.Maybe he is reading your post, and that's what he actually sees? Stuff about agents not being black, claims that posters aren't racist, but are, but aren't. He also seems to think that all items of clothing are called Blazers. The educated guess bit could be a hidden truth about his lack of an education, resulting in constant guesswork on his part, which also explains why he completely misunderstood your post, twice.
I think that's it.
Theft is a crime. I once saw an Eskimo.15m is a steal for a player of his quality in todays market, 3m a year over 5yrs.
While Liverpool won nothing and got torn limb from limb by City, Newcastle, Blackburn, Blackpool, Stoke, West Ham and Northampton....Manchester United might have just won their 19th title, but they also got torn limb from limb by Barcelona...
Hmmm, could have sworn the Beatles broke up a couple of months back....Oasis are no more, Ashley, so dig out the White Album...
now now. im just pointing out to the people saying we over payed for him because he had 1yr left of his contract. Regardless of his previous contract situation, its still a financially sound deal.How much does it work out over 25 years scottish?
Or, if he leaves in January, what about that? 15m for 6 months. Risky.
Some quotes would be nice rather than posting the same thing again and again.To be honest I dont have an issue with those who are still saying they dont rate him or dont think it will be a good signing. People are entitled to an opinion of a player. There has been signings in the past when I have not agreed with them too.
I have more of an issue with those who claimed he was shite and nowhere near Utd quality just a few short months ago and now are suddenly big fans of the player
Love the way dippers cling on to the myth about the atmosphere at Anfield, at least we've got the grace to admit ours is often shite, along with pretty much every Premier League ground bar the odd small, recently-promoted club with 20,000 over-excited fans.
Well, that just went over my head... scouse humour?We, however, are going to buy Phil Jones
Saw this on twitter, not sure of it's reliability.According to ESPN Radio, the Glazers have informed the NYSE that the fee for Young is $16m-£11m
I think it was from the 3rd of June. Poor little Liverpool.Love the way dippers cling on to the myth about the atmosphere at Anfield, at least we've got the grace to admit ours is often shite, along with pretty much every Premier League ground bar the odd small, recently-promoted club with 20,000 over-excited fans.
And as for...
Well, that just went over my head... scouse humour?
Hope so. Find it weird to pay £15M + when he wanted to leave with one year left on his contract.Saw this on twitter, not sure of it's reliability.
Great price, if true.
Not way off-target from 15m. 11m + add-ons. For the price, a good deal indeed.Saw this on twitter, not sure of it's reliability.
Great price, if true.
Errr according to some random person on twitter. Something that not one site has reported. @KM, who tweeted that? Plplease tell me that you didn't quote someone with absolutely no credentials. Also why would the glazers reveal the details when they've never done so before?So the glazers have confirmed to the New York stock exchange that weve paid 11 million for Young, if that's correct that's an absolutely brilliant deal.
Well, it's because Young have a better foot than Valencia, and bigger repertoire when it comes to tricking defenders. Also, Young has had a huge impact on Aston Villa, and his record of assists is better than most in PL. He can also score goals. I don't know how much you've seen him play, but I've been watching Villa pretty closely the last couple of seasons because one of my mates is a Villa supporter, and because they've had quite some interesting talent coming through.I really don't get this.
Heck of a deal there considering what similar players have gone for.£15 million according to Sky Sports News.
A really good signing that is a far better option on the left than both Park and Nani.
Come on then Randall, time to back this statement up with some quotes if you're taking such an issue, or are you just talking shite?To be honest I dont have an issue with those who are still saying they dont rate him or dont think it will be a good signing. People are entitled to an opinion of a player. There has been signings in the past when I have not agreed with them too.
I have more of an issue with those who claimed he was shite and nowhere near Utd quality just a few short months ago and now are suddenly big fans of the player
2.when will we know his shirt number?
18?
Surely that's edited.....if not, that is amazing.
Ssshhh (that's far too sensible a question).United aren't a publicly traded company anymore (at least not on the NYSE - I know there's been talk of Hong Kong), so why would the Glazers be telling them how much we've spent?