I think the truth is somewhere in between the extremes people are posting. Yes, the goalkeeper issue is glaring and has cost us points already, and we don't know the level of Lammens yet. Yes, the midfield is unbalanced and Amorim’s rigidity with the 3-4-2-1 has been frustrating. But there are also real signs of progress compared to last season that shouldn’t be ignored.
Against Arsenal we played some of our best football in months and were unlucky not to take something. At Fulham we had 20 minutes of dominance where we could have killed the game, and against Burnley we created enough chances to win two matches. Last season, we were often struggling to create anything, so even though the finishing has been poor, the volume and quality of chances being generated is encouraging.
Cunha and Mbeumo look like they’ve added exactly what we’ve been crying out for – dynamism, directness, and real quality in the final third. The final piece is Sesko finding his confidence in front of goal. Once he gets one or two, I think he’ll take off, and we’ll suddenly look a much more dangerous side.
As for the midfield, I agree with those saying Bruno isn’t the solution as a deeper CM. He’s a top-class offensive midfielder, but if we want real control of games, we need someone who can dictate tempo and hold shape next to Casemiro or his successor. That doesn’t mean the whole project is doomed, though. Amorim’s system is built on structure, five-lane occupation, and coordinated pressing. If we get the right profiles in midfield, it could click in a big way – but right now it’s not fully there. If Mainoo would step up he could be the solution, next to a ball-winning workaholic (Baleba).
I get the concerns about Amorim being too stubborn, but it’s also true that every manager needs time to implement a repeatable method. Pep, Klopp, and even Arteta all had rocky first seasons where people were calling them inflexible too. The key is whether the players buy into the system and whether the club addresses the obvious weaknesses in GK and CM.
So, overall, I see this as a transitional phase. There are more positives than people give credit for, and if we stick with the plan rather than ripping it up again, there’s a platform here to build something that actually lasts. It’s not perfect, far from it, but the ingredients are better than they were a year ago.