- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 36,623
Fantastic
Don't think anyone else is reporting these stories, so there is a hope still.
Fantastic
Oh gosh, im sorryI would do a much better job to be fair
Christ. You can only laugh
Yeah I think this too, if of course they genuinely have no reservations.The board may just be like many posters here. Tried experience now we need patience. So let's stick with him. Time makes a manager.
Fecking A, mate. I said it earlier on, I saw him being called a sh**stain in another thread, absolutely unacceptable.Too much generalising going on on both sides of the Ole argument. I support the manager and will do until he is no longer the manager, but I have no issue with criticism of him as long as it's respectfully done. I'm not happy with some of our so-called fans who think it's acceptable to call Ole 'Golem' or 'Ole Gunnar Sockpuppet' and many of the other insults we wouldn't accept if it were coming from an opposition fan on here.
No matter what you think of his manging abilities, to the generation of fans who saw his entire United playing career, Ole the footballer will always have a very special place in our hearts and a few people on here need to keep that in mind before posting the ad hominem attacks.
Whims and fancies is how we're being run. Were seemingly going with a set of values - youth, fast paced football, British etc - forgetting that no matter which approach you prefer, quality and talent come first.Yeah I think this too, if of course they genuinely have no reservations.
A really weird approach to handling a top club.
I think so too.I think we'll stick with him until the end of the season as long as there's no possibility of relegation.
Probably for the same reason it was acceptable then, that he decision makers behind the scenes get to see alot more of what goes on that you do, and so they know the chances of it improving in the future.This is the lowest points total at this stage since 1988-89. How is this acceptable to anyone. Ole gets a free ride & it’s pathetic. We deserve this shite season for not being pro active enough & making the right decisions
Chelsea had no problem sacking Di Matteo after he won The Champions LeagueThis is the problem with appointing a club legend as manager. It's not easy to sack a coach who is an ex player/legend.
the issue is not only the inevitable, but it will set us back if we go with him into next season and promising managers are again off the market. We will sack him mid season with no plan who to take over. We are in a loop of shitty decisions upon shitty decisions all over the park, and our manager situation is the epitome of itSimply because he’s a club legend as a player he’s getting an extended opportunity. It’s ridiculous. We’re letting emotion get in between a clear cut decision.
We’re only prolonging the inevitable.
Agree 100%Fecking A, mate. I said it earlier on, I saw him being called a sh**stain in another thread, absolutely unacceptable.
They also sacked Ancelotti after he won the double. That was a different time at Chelsea.Chelsea had no problem sacking Di Matteo after he won The Champions League
If this is true then it's very clear we are a finished club like Milan. Standards are gone completely.
Sh*tstain is too far but I call him Sockpuppet all the time and will continue to do so as long as he resembles one.Fecking A, mate. I said it earlier on, I saw him being called a sh**stain in another thread, absolutely unacceptable.
Because he's being paid one of the highest salaries in world football for a football manager (allow that to sink in) while proving to be an absolutely shite football manager. Basic and simple reasoning and highly logical.Why should we sack Ole?
Woody is the one to sack, we need reinforcement, and we need someone to actually make transferrs materialize!
Unfortunately we have a lot of immature fans who feel proud giving nicknames to a club legend. Nicknames even opposing fans wouldn't think of.Fecking A, mate. I said it earlier on, I saw him being called a sh**stain in another thread, absolutely unacceptable.
Absolutely, it's uncalled for.Agree 100%
Its okay to be critical, but beeing a troll is just that, troll!
Exactly, opposition fans wouldn't even be doing it but so called fans of the club can do it? It's a joke and I'm fed up seeing stuff like that.In any case Poch can't accept a new job until the summer due to his contract clause.
Unfortunately we have a lot of immature fans who feel proud giving nicknames to a club legend. Nicknames even opposing fans wouldn't think of.
Bayern had no problem.This is the problem with appointing a club legend as manager. It's not easy to sack a coach who is an ex player/legend.
Bayern is well run club with footballing people at the top of the chain.Bayern had no problem.
Glad you have noticed and highlighted this too.Too much generalising going on on both sides of the Ole argument. I support the manager and will do until he is no longer the manager, but I have no issue with criticism of him as long as it's respectfully done. I'm not happy with some of our so-called fans who think it's acceptable to call Ole 'Golem' or 'Ole Gunnar Sockpuppet' and many of the other insults we wouldn't accept if it were coming from an opposition fan on here.
No matter what you think of his manging abilities, to the generation of fans who saw his entire United playing career, Ole the footballer will always have a very special place in our hearts and a few people on here need to keep that in mind before posting the ad hominem attacks.
The very day he got the full-time job, I said: look how well ex legends did at Liverpool and Leeds (with maybe one exception). it doesn't fecking work if the guy isn't manager materialthe issue is not only the inevitable, but it will set us back if we go with him into next season and promising managers are again off the market. We will sack him mid season with no plan who to take over. We are in a loop of shitty decisions upon shitty decisions all over the park, and our manager situation is the epitome of it
They did to be honestI don't think managerial changes would be as open.
I'm sure transfer business or general structural thoughts are difficult to keep quiet, but a big change like sacking probably not.
Did Athletic really talk about the board not keeping Emery until it happened? I only recall the reports being post Southampton which means they weren't really giving that much breaking info.
So I'm on the site and can't find much about them reporting the board being unhappy with Emery prior to him being sacked?They did to be honest