Solskjaer's legacy and his future

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
We are in our current mid table because of him. The others have run away with the league. We will be extremely lucky if we make the 4th this season.
Ralf doesn't have the time to turn it around this season. With this squad we should be among the top 4 at least and maybe even the top 2?
He could have had time if the board would have sacked Ole after the city game, instead of sending him on a fishing trip. Shambles. Imagine Ralf with two weeks there
 

Gazza

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
32,644
Location
'tis a silly place
I'm sorry but that just isn't true. The cultural reboot was something that he drove. He got Murtough and Fletcher into their roles, he got the data analytics and analysis departments off the ground, he reinstated the use of tech such as GPS in the sports science department after Jose forced us to do away with them.

The club was in a word, a basket case when he arrived with the brand being toxic both inside and outside the club. There was certainly no clamour for the manager's position when Jose left, like there seemingly is and was after Ole left. That Pochettino was apparently actively looking to leave PSG midseason and Rangnick has taken this interim job on when he absolutely didn't need to, should tell you of the quality foundations laid by Ole for the next man, as well as the fact that Rangnick isn't being brought in as someone to undo the work that Ole did, but to build on it.

He also was the only post-SAF manager who achieved two back to back top 4 finishes. Something that neither Jose or LvG could achieve despite spending more than Ole did at the same point in their tenures.

Yes, it ultimately went wrong at the end but he absolutely did a good job up to this point. Unfortunately it didn't work out and the blame is going to be laid squarely on him for that, but he wasn't exactly helped along the way either.

Not sure where we've been set back by years in either. We have a young team who are continuing to grow and develop with a ready supply line from the academy coming through as well. Literally the only areas which need investment in are found in deep midfield, everywhere else has quality and depth and for the first time since SAF, we actually have a coherently built squad. From GK, to CB, to the wings, to up front. We have legitimately top class players like Varane, Ronaldo, Sancho here. We certainly didn't have that in any of the other managers' time at the club. To hear you say we've been set back years you'd think Ole did what Jose did and proceeded to buy shit on top of the shit purchased by the previous manager and didn't bother to actually rebuild the squad. The fact we all went from looking to break top 4 to actively trying to challenge for the league is proof positive of the job he did. We certainly weren't thinking that in Jose's third season, or LvG's second, for example.

And then I can talk about the improvement of the likes of McFred and Shaw who were seen as legitimate joke figures among the fanbase. Or the fact we were much more enterprising under Ole than we were with the other guys 5+ goals scored 10 times in c.160 games: the previous 3 managers? twice in 302 games.
Bizarre statement. Poch and Rangnick probably saw a job that couldn't realistically be done worse than how Ole was doing it, at a huge club with huge potential, and a fat paycheck too. How on earth can you use that as evidence of Ole's foundation-laying prowess?
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
He could have had time if the board would have sacked Ole after the city game, instead of sending him on a fishing trip. Shambles. Imagine Ralf with two weeks there
Yes I agree with you. He should have been sacked the moment we got thrashed by Liverpool. Or even before that.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
How did he leave us better off than Jose when Jose won trophies, came 2nd, made finals and left us higher on the table when he got sacked. All after a summer without Marquee signings and a highly toxic dressing room. You can't call one a success and the other a failure. I thought the folie en masse would be over when he left but it's still going and we are now crediting him for getting sacked so we could sign a better manager. Like being incompetent was part of some failure by design masterplan. Jose left us toxic, Ole left us broken.
 

jm99

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
4,667
How did he leave us better off than Jose when Jose won trophies, came 2nd, made finals and left us higher on the table when he got sacked. All after a summer without Marquee signings and a highly toxic dressing room. You can't call one a success and the other a failure. I thought the folie en masse would be over when he left but it's still going and we are now crediting him for getting sacked so we could sign a better manager. Like being incompetent was part of some failure by design masterplan. Jose left us toxic, Ole left us broken.
I think when people say he left us better off they mean with a better squad, which it definitely is. But I don't think solskjaer should be given much credit for spending half a billion and leaving a better squad behind
 

passtheball

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 27, 2021
Messages
172
Ole didn’t meet everyone’s expectations last season. In the end he meet nobody’s expectations.

Now it’s time to move on and see if Ralf is able to fulfil the potential of the team Ole build. That’s something we shouldn’t forget talking about Ole’s legacy :)

Ralf is perfect for us right now and I think he’ll improve our play immediately. I’m very very exited and look forward to se him in action.

Credit to people who managed to bring him to United. Think it was a very smart move.
I don't want to beat a dead horse, but Ole's building of this team is way overrated. The players he bought with big money for the first team were household names like AWB, Maguire, Fernandes, Sancho, Varane, and Ronaldo. Any bloke could have picked them. The lesser known players he bought - we just don't hear of them anymore, do we?

Not to mention the gaping hole in midfield he left us.

If we had got Rangnick right after Mourinho, he would have probably built a better team with the money Ole spent. So, again, sentimentality is clouding some people's judgement of Ole.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
I think when people say he left us better off they mean with a better squad, which it definitely is. But I don't think solskjaer should be given much credit for spending half a billion and leaving a better squad behind
I'm also not keen on praising anyone for not wasting half a billion. That's not a standard worth considering. It's basically failing after being given a blank cheque but also Jose actually left behind a decent squad as well. A squad that finished 2nd, got further than Ole's CL campaign and made a cup final. Even unfavoured assets like Lukaku were sellable for a fortune. Probably more than we'll see for Maguire and AWB. Then Rashford, Martial, Shaw, Mctominay, Pogba, Fred and a number of players who were starters in Ole's best season came from previous managers. No one gives Jose credit for leaving most of them behind.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,907
Location
Rehovot, Israel
I don't want to beat a dead horse, but Ole's building of this team is way overrated. The players he bought with big money for the first team were household names like AWB, Maguire, Fernandes, Sancho, Varane, and Ronaldo. Any bloke could have picked them. The lesser known players he bought - we just don't hear of them anymore, do we?
To be fair, while Fernandes was a known name, not many were trying to pick him out of the Portuguese League. We did and it turned out to be an inspired signing.

Unfortunately, Fernandes is also probably our only unequivocal success in the transfer market during Solskjaer's tenure.
 

Kopral Jono

Full Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
3,409
Sentimentality was ingrained at such an extent during Ole's tenure that there will be two opposing camps going at each other's throat for years to come whenever his name is mentioned. In a cruel twist of fate for a man supposedly brought in to bring unity and stability, this could very well be his most lasting legacy as our manager.
 

Karlos PFC

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
375
Sentimentality was ingrained at such an extent during Ole's tenure that there will be two opposing camps going at each other's throat for years to come whenever his name is mentioned. In a cruel twist of fate for a man supposedly brought in to bring unity and stability, this could very well be his most lasting legacy as our manager.
/thread

Nail in the head
 

stw2022

New Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2021
Messages
3,687
A contributory factor to his downfall was this idea he considered himself a manager rather than a head coach. I think he's on record as saying as much. It's how the great managers of the past, Clough, Ferguson etc, eventually managed; hands off, delegation. But they weren't like that in the beginning. That's what you can do once you achieve a certain status and have a team of staff around you good enough and that you trust. In the beginning, like all the greats have done, you need to get stuck in and be a training ground manager to stamp your mark on the team.

To me it seems as if Ole really just wanted to play latter-years Alex Ferguson rather than actually put any of the work and toil early-years Fergie put into getting to the stage where he could be hands off. You can't have achieved nothing in the game as manager and walk into a club like United and manage it the same way Sir Alex did. You see the difference with the manager now who is much older, has achieved far more yet going by his words alone will probably put in more effort than coming in to spin on Sir Alex's chair for a few hours and give team talks where he says nothing more substantial than "get stuck in, lads"
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,827
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
It's impossible really to answer because whether on not you think we are now better or worse off for having had three years of Ole depends on what the club might have done instead.

I think one thing people do forget really quickly is just how poor our squad was when Ole took over. Plus, under Ole we finished 3rd and then 2nd. It might not have been pretty at times and there were bad times along the way, but I'm not sure even Pep or Klopp could have achieved higher league finishes with our squad.

Having said all that, I was surprised at quite how poorly coached we looked this year. It was Sunday League stuff. That worries me, because maybe we have wasted a year that we could have used to be coaching an actual style into our players. I suppose it depends how quickly Ralf can get his ideas into the players.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,906
Location
Croatia
50 mil worth defensive fb who can't play in attacking system and 80mil worth captain who is in reality 3rd best defender in club, are his biggest legacy to new coach.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,906
Location
Croatia
How did he leave us better off than Jose when Jose won trophies, came 2nd, made finals and left us higher on the table when he got sacked. All after a summer without Marquee signings and a highly toxic dressing room. You can't call one a success and the other a failure. I thought the folie en masse would be over when he left but it's still going and we are now crediting him for getting sacked so we could sign a better manager. Like being incompetent was part of some failure by design masterplan. Jose left us toxic, Ole left us broken.
"Team is in better place than 3 years ago"...... biggest myth which will never die.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
50 mil worth defensive fb who can't play in attacking system and 80mil worth captain who is in reality 3rd best defender in club, are his biggest legacy to new coach.
:o
Maguire played well, Greenwood did well, Dalot only played a couple of decent/good games but of course this doesn’t stop you writing the same stupid stuff.
But hey, last few results have been alright without Pogba, no? ;)
 

Chairman Steve

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2018
Messages
7,050
One training session under Ralf and already you can see something exciting potentially. Solskjaer’s legacy will involve people wondering what the hell they did in training.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,126
50 mil worth defensive fb who can't play in attacking system and 80mil worth captain who is in reality 3rd best defender in club, are his biggest legacy to new coach.
How do you rank our centrebacks 1 to 5?
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,230
Location
Not Moskva
His legacy as a manager is looking worse after today.
We can argue all we want on here but it is self-evident. For all the nice words in that exit interview, the club has done once again a screeching u-turn that would make Boris Johnson proud. From old school “United (i.e. Fergie era) DNA” to German theorist who is the high priest of Gegenpress.
 

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
3,379
How do you rank our centrebacks 1 to 5?
1. Varane
2. Lindelof
3. Bailly
4. Maguire
For me, the ability to play in a high line is very important to a high press system and Maguire does not sooth that.
 

Kill 'em all

Pastor of Muppets
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
10,546
The lack of system was always the problem for Ole. After Bruno joined, he was carried solely by his moments of magic and consistent attacking output. Before Bruno we were playing like a mid-table side and after Bruno joined, we were playing like a mid-table side that had a player who could create something out of nothing.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,906
Location
Croatia
How do you rank our centrebacks 1 to 5?
Varane is level above all.
Lindelof is level above Maguire.
Maguire is 3rd best.
Bailly is close to Harry. Tbh in attacking system he is maybe even better solution than Harry.
To be clear; i am not saying thst Harry is shit defender. But he is not type of defender for attacking football
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,126
1. Varane
2. Lindelof
3. Bailly
4. Maguire
For me, the ability to play in a high line is very important to a high press system and Maguire does not sooth that.
Varane is level above all.
Lindelof is level above Maguire.
Maguire is 3rd best.
Bailly is close to Harry. Tbh in attacking system he is maybe even better solution than Harry.
To be clear; i am not saying thst Harry is shit defender. But he is not type of defender for attacking football
Fair enough I agree on Varane, I'd have Bailly 4th also too reckless when he is fit for my liking. Going off this seasons form Lindelof has been better but over all in their United careers I'd still have Maguire 2nd behind Varane.

I'd like to see Varane and Maguire get a run together to see if they can form a solid partnership.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
1. Varane
2. Lindelof
3. Bailly
4. Maguire
For me, the ability to play in a high line is very important to a high press system and Maguire does not sooth that.
I am also worried by how uncomfortable he looked in possession. He takes ages to make a decision and by that time, an opposing player is on him.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,906
Location
Croatia
One training session under Ralf and already you can see something exciting potentially. Solskjaer’s legacy will involve people wondering what the hell they did in training.
Passion and desire. And i am not even joking. Guy said that by himself.
Tactics are not important. It is who wants it more. Mind blowing
 

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
Ole's point about systems, tactics etc not being that important and it being about desire and winning 50/50s will look dumber by the week.
 

Denis Irwinning

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Messages
51
We got 2nd with no tactics apparently, yet the German genius winning 1-0 to Palace thanks to Fred worldie shows how bad Ole is. United fans never fail to surprise me.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,273
Supports
Hannover 96
From old school “United (i.e. Fergie era) DNA” to German theorist who is the high priest of Gegenpress.
Want the ball.
Harass every opposition player.
Sub on a youngster.
Win the game.

Lot's of Fergie DNA in this game I think.

United under Ole lacked all those things, so this is more back to Fergie than everything Ole ever coached into the team.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,338
I do like how one hard fought 1-0 win over Crystal Palace proves the manager who got 3rd and 2nd in the previous 2 seasons was totally incompetent...

I can only assume if we don't go to Newcastle and thump them more than 4-1 that means the current manager is a joke and needs to go etc.
 

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
We got 2nd with no tactics apparently, yet the German genius winning 1-0 to Palace thanks to Fred worldie shows how bad Ole is. United fans never fail to surprise me.
We got 2nd because of Liverpool's injuries and Chelsea only getting Tuchel in midseason, they were clearly better than us by the end of the season. And empty stadiums helped us.
 

GlasgowCeltic

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
5,236
Couldn't help thinking of that no one will out work us quote as the players looked absolutely shattered today at the sight of hard work
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,338
We got 2nd because of Liverpool's injuries and Chelsea only getting Tuchel in midseason. And empty stadiums.
Tuchel got 4 more points than Solskjaer did last season in the same time period and that included the end of the season where they played City in a glorified friendly and we were basically off for the last 4 games of the season.

You are correct though, we are the only team in the league who played in an empty stadium which was a distinct advantage.
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
We got 2nd because of Liverpool's injuries and Chelsea only getting Tuchel in midseason, they were clearly better than us by the end of the season. And empty stadiums helped us.
Someone is always struggling when someone else does well. Almost all top teams struggled in 2015/16 but that didn’t stop us from only getting 5th in the league.
And I can guarantee you if we finish top 2 in the league in the coming years, then again at least 1 or 2 of Chelsea/City/Liverpool will be struggling or Tuchel will be gone or something like that.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,204
I do like how one hard fought 1-0 win over Crystal Palace proves the manager who got 3rd and 2nd in the previous 2 seasons was totally incompetent...

I can only assume if we don't go to Newcastle and thump them more than 4-1 that means the current manager is a joke and needs to go etc.
Agreed.

We don't need the result today as proof of Ole being incompetent.
 

MoskvaRed

Full Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
5,230
Location
Not Moskva
Want the ball.
Harass every opposition player.
Sub on a youngster.
Win the game.

Lot's of Fergie DNA in this game I think.

United under Ole lacked all those things, so this is more back to Fergie than everything Ole ever coached into the team.
Absolutely, this was the most United performance for years. I put the “DNA” in inverted commas as I was referring to the phoney, ersatz version that has been pedalled by the club and the Ole apologists on here for the last few years.If we followed that version of the “United Way” in 1986, we would not have appointed Ferguson but given the job to a random ex-player like Gordon Hill or Willie Morgan.