Are they really much better than Chelsea as a squad? The likes of Azpilicueta, Luiz, Alonso, Cahill, Kante, Hazard, Pedro, Willian and Higuain have each won more major trophies individually than most of the Spurs team combined. That didn't happen by accident. Then you have the likes of Kepa (the world's most expensive goalkeeper), Giroud (starting forward for the World Cup winners) and Hudson-Odoi (much hyped young prospect) knocking around the squad too.
I fundamentally think a lot of people overrate this Spurs team because they have a strong looking first 11 when really their squad is filled with a lot of dross. Plus even some of their supposedly strong starters (like Lloris, for example) are better players on paper than they often are in reality.
At the start of the season I figured they'd be fighting for a top four place and that's exactly where they are. The fact that they somehow had a 10+ point lead in the first place was the weird anomaly, not that they then regressed.
That bold part is Interesting since you apply that to spurs players but forget about chelsea players. Luiz/Cahill/Pedro/Willian/Higuain/Giroud/Alonso are prime examples of players who are good on paper but on the pitch don't offer much. Kapa is in his first season at chelsea, Hudson-Odoi is a young player who plays fewer games than Giroud (Yes... the great world cup winner scoring a grand total of 0 goals and his last decent season was in 2016-17 where he scored 16 goals in 40 games, in 2016-17 Alli scored 22 in 50 games as SS or some like to call him a Midfielder for some reason).
As for chelsea players having won more trophies than spurs team combined, Wouldn't that put them under the
better players on paper than they often are in reality since
reality is Now and not in the past, they finished outside top 4 last season and potentially could do so this season as well. So much for chelsea player's great trophy collection that they can't even get past a spurs team who haven't won anything. You listed those players for chelsea who have done well in the past but for 2 seasons now, they heavily rely on Hazard to win them the game and if he doesn't feel like it then there's not much else.
You say spurs are overrated and besides the first 11 rest are dross then who have chelsea got? As starters Luiz and Cahill (
) are not better than both spurs CB's, Alonso is a shit defender but he does well in attack so people forget how shit he's at defending, pedro has been bang average for years, willian hasn't been good for awhile (I'll never understand why he gets so much praise for someone who doesn't produce often ), Higuain is on loan and looks slow (food and age), Azpilliceuta is good as are Hazard and Kante.......so these are their most important players and now we shall move onto the top class bench that chelsea have.....Barkely/ RLC/ Kovacic (pointless player IMO)....yes, truly enriching talent there. You base Chelsea team being better due to them winning trophies in the past but they are just in the group of being
better players on paper than they often are in reality.
Spurs are no where near Pool/city and they're closer to Chelsea/Arsenal and United but regardless if its an anomaly or not they were still 10+ points above us and now are level. I would think of that as a bottle job which could result in them finishing outside top 4.