No he wasn't
Liverpool are a really well run club right now. They were never going to replace Klopp with Gerrard just because he was a good player for them back in the day. They aren't Man United. Yea, turned yous down. Like I said. There's no such thing as a well run club, either you have a good manager or you don't. Klopp has literally polished a turd, and a turd it will continue to be after he moves to another club and makes them successful.No he wasn't
And Eddie Howe not coming to Celtic wasn't because he turned us down. He'd verbally agreed. Their were difficulties with his backroom staff which again became a problem when Newcastle approached him.
Interesting to hear what these decisions are. Clearly the referee in your last game forgot about the pro-Rangers conspiracy when Dundee weren’t awarded a stonewall penalty, and forgetful again in the previous game Livingston weren’t awarded the same with the scores at 0-0 in the 85th minute.
So I just had a check and these may be wrong but I checked the league table. This highlights your paranoia as next level.
I agree on the last part. Being relegated under Vincent Tan isn't saying much about the manager though. It says a lot more actually applying for the job and work under a guy like Tan
Im just wondering, if myself or Gio came on here using the word f**ian to describe Celtic, would you deem that as sectarian?
What’s going on with Howe’s back room staff that’s creating problems for clubs?
Have a look at his European record, it’s what kept him in a job when he was struggling to break down teams in the SPL in 19/20. For the most part Rangers have actually been very effective in strangling teams, sometimes more gifted opposition, through their shape and compactness.
He had 3 years left on his Rangers deal and Villa wanted him as manager. Why would he leave a 3 year deal at Rangers for an 8 or 18 month deal at Villa? He'd be pissing at least 5m down the drain.
What manager is going to sign that?! Some of you forget that these are literally jobs!Mental if true. Imo he's lucky to get a prem job at this point - he may turn out to be a hit but no chance he gets this job without his Prem pedigree as a player. Baffling how many clubs still seem to employ managers based on past playing achievements (not an Ole dig, tough though that may be too believe...!)
TBF before the 7-2 last season we've beaten Liverpool once at VP in about 15 years so would make little difference. Also no different to Steve Bruce's abysmal record down the years against Man. United (compared to him getting good results v likes of Chelsea and Liverpool regularly).
A pint of bitter? No wait you’re already full it seems
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm pretty sure in any league you'll find the few "shock results" every season, the PL isn't unique in that regard.
Aye I can't see any of those links materialising to be honest. Most of them have been fuelled by Scottish ex-pro pundits filling air space over the last couple of weeks. Possibly Kamara who could be dropped into just about any team and look at home given his balance and technical comfort on the ball. Or a Kent or Aribo figure who could certainly do a job at Villa's level, but otherwise I'm only seeing sideways steps from his former players. For example there is some talk about Goldson whose contract is up in the summer, but I really don't think he improves them and is currently struggling in an error-strewn season. If Villa are to break into the top 6 or so then they'll need to invest in a different, game-changing level of player.
most of it is probably bollicks by the press, but I could see Kent being a legit one, in that Gerrard would want him and he would want to move.
We really need a new DM and saw a bit of Kamara playing for Finland in summer and thought he looked decent on the ball and certainly better than Nakamba so I'd take him as player for next 18 months.
