Test Cricket Decades Draft R1: Indnyc vs Mani

Who will win the match based on all the players at their peaks?


  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .

Moby

Dick
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
51,356
Location
Barcelona, Catalunya
Welcome to the Test Cricket Decades Draft Round 1 match up. The two teams will be assessed based on a 3 match test series on the surfaces mentioned below. Only the test performances of the said players will be used for evaluation, no other format has any weight in the match up. The surfaces are:

1. Flat batting pitch with little help for any bowlers.
2. A greentop that aids pace bowling.
3. A slow dustbowl that aids spin bowling.

Please vote for the team that you think will prevail at the end of the series.

Team Indnyc

A very strong top order with decent depth in batting.



Bowling is led by the fearsome pace duo of Willis and Larwood. Lance Gibbs is the spin option with both Ted McDonald and Denis Atkinson are great pace bowlers in their own right.




Team Mani



Write up


Batting opens with S.Gavasakar / M.Hayden(With Superior technique of S.Gavaskar and flamboyant batting of M.Hayden) I got the best opening combo out of the two team and are in the best position to see through the new ball attack which means my one down batsmen is not exposed to new ball early in the game.

R.Kanhai - Plays the specialist position No.3,R.Kanhai can play it to perfection with is strong technics.

A.Kippax/Sir Frank Worrell-All three very good batsmen of both pace and spin bowling and their records speak for themselves.All three are good enough for long innings.

LMO-(J.Bairstow /W.Akram) Wicket keeping batsmen and bowling allrounder who are more than capable enough to score more than few runs and their record speak for themselves.

Bowling wins test matches,with superior bowling and combination of attack spearheaded by
Wasim Akram , A.Roberts and Sir Alec Bedser, All 3 premium strike bowler which much variety I got better chance to win this 3 match series Plus I got support from Sir Frank Worrell who used to open bowling for Windies.

Spin - Saqlain Mushtaq Tricky customers who can bowl with at most accuracy at any kind of Wicket who is more than just the off spinner with much variety to his bowling.

Sir Frank Worrell as Captain, No better man to utilise his resources better that Sir Frank Worrell.
Sir Frank was a man of strong convictions, a brave man, and it goes without saying, a great cricketer. Though he made his name as a player his greatest contribution was to destroy for ever the myth that a coloured cricketer was not fit to lead a team. Once appointed, he ended the cliques and rivalries between the players of various islands to weld together a team which in the space of five years became the champions of the world
 

The Cat

Will drink milk from your hands
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
12,315
Location
Feet up at home.
First question I have to ask is why are some First Class stats included?

The rules are clear that only tests count.
 

Mani

Full Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
7,661
Mani is also at least one bowler short isn't he?

Worrell only averaged 38.
F.Worrell used to open bowling with his Windies side, so he's well capable of bowling the 5th bowling choice.
 

The Cat

Will drink milk from your hands
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
12,315
Location
Feet up at home.
F.Worrell used to open bowling with his Windies side, so he's well capable of bowling the 5th bowling choice.
Sorry I just think the bowling attack is let down by him. He's a class batsman and a decent all rounder but I would prefer to see an extra leading bowler in the attack.
 

The Cat

Will drink milk from your hands
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
12,315
Location
Feet up at home.
Still not sure how to vote though as Indnyc posting first class stats doesn't sit right with me.
 

Mani

Full Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
7,661
Sorry I just think the bowling attack is let down by him. He's a class batsman and a decent all rounder but I would prefer to see an extra leading bowler in the attack.
What you need 5 pure bowlers in the test side ? Most of the test side go with 4 pure bowler and one allrounder and if the main bowlers can't do the job how can expect the 5th all rounder to the job.
 

The Cat

Will drink milk from your hands
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
12,315
Location
Feet up at home.
What you need 5 pure bowlers in the test side ? Most of the test side go with 4 pure bowler and one allrounder and if the main bowlers can't do the job how can expect the 5th all rounder to the job.
Just thinking in the context of this he is not up to being considered a very good bowling option. This is an all time draft there will be much better bowling all rounders.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
Can’t really claim that players don’t have great test records but are actually good due to their first class records, sorry. I understand that’s maybe unfair but not really in the spirit of the draft. This ted McDonald and Dennis Atkinson, however great they were at first class level, seem not that great in tests.
 

Interval

Level
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
11,334
Location
Mostly harmless
Sorry Indy. You needed one more wc bowler in support of Willis. I like your batting more. I can see you winning one, especially the spin pitch. The pace pitch goes to Mani. But the final one, should ideally be a draw. But if I have to pick one, I'd pick Mani because of a slight advantage.
 

Indnyc

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
4,537
Still not sure how to vote though as Indnyc posting first class stats doesn't sit right with me.
Can’t really claim that players don’t have great test records but are actually good due to their first class records, sorry. I understand that’s maybe unfair but not really in the spirit of the draft. This ted McDonald and Dennis Atkinson, however great they were at first class level, seem not that great in tests.
Ah I didn’t read the rules properly.. I gave the first class stats for two players who have played about 20 matches..

I think the judgement should then be just based on what their performances in tests have been.. Please ignore the first class stats.. I’ll resubmit in a bit.. Just woke up
 

Indnyc

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
4,537
Sorry Indy. You needed one more wc bowler in support of Willis. I like your batting more. I can see you winning one, especially the spin pitch. The pace pitch goes to Mani. But the final one, should ideally be a draw. But if I have to pick one, I'd pick Mani because of a slight advantage.
Thanks.. Think I have a stronger batting lineup than his but he does have a better bowling attack..
 

NM

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
12,350
@Indnyc top batting, but the bowling lets you down. Voted for @Mani Btw are you in NYC as your username suggests?
 

Himannv

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
5,794
Location
Somewhere in the draft forum
@Indnyc Lara at 3 and Ponting at 4? Hmmm. Can't say I see eye to eye with that. They're both better at 3, but if I were to push one of them down the order, it'd be Lara. Ponting at 4 just looks weird to me since he doesn't have a great record there anyway, while Lara has batted more at 4 then at 3 and averages 50+, which compares favourably to Ponting's meh 40.

Also Denis Atkinson is a poor pick IMO. Surely there were much better players born in the 20s?

Also picking Haynes ahead of Greenidge in Tests is a big mistake IMO. If this were ODIs, I'd have much more sympathy with that choice.

@Mani looks like he has the better team. I'd upgrade on Kippax personally though. Good bat, but not quite the world beater you need to complete what is otherwise an exceptional batting lineup.
 

Indnyc

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
4,537
@Indnyc Lara at 3 and Ponting at 4? Hmmm. Can't say I see eye to eye with that. They're both better at 3, but if I were to push one of them down the order, it'd be Lara. Ponting at 4 just looks weird to me since he doesn't have a great record there anyway, while Lara has batted more at 4 then at 3 and averages 50+, which compares favourably to Ponting's meh 40.

Also Denis Atkinson is a poor pick IMO. Surely there were much better players born in the 20s?

Also picking Haynes ahead of Greenidge in Tests is a big mistake IMO. If this were ODIs, I'd have much more sympathy with that choice.

@Mani looks like he has the better team. I'd upgrade on Kippax personally though. Good bat, but not quite the world beater you need to complete what is otherwise an exceptional batting lineup.
I thought Greenidge was already picked :wenger:
 

Mani

Full Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
7,661
Hard luck @Indnyc , you had a good batting unit unfortunately its your bowling that let you down.