Jonno
Full Member
Won the ball, got some of the man, both Flew in, fair challenge
You're obviously talking about things you actually have no idea about. What a waste of time tbh.No, of course not, what kind of question is that? There are infinite amounts of possible tackles, it's impossible to make a list.
The rule is still the same, it's the interpretation of the rule that's different (by some fans and clearly not the referee or VAR). If that counts as excessive force for a challenge where he clearly won the ball then we might as well just ban sliding challenges. Luckily I thought the ref was decent today, I thought he had a good control over the game even if he didn't get every single decision right.It's not about how we would have reacted, it's about what the rules are and how they are interpreted. A lot of challenges are fouls now that wouldn't have been 30 years ago. It's not about you being a hardman and other people being soft, it's about you not knowing the rules. If this was 1990 I would say that the tackle was perfectly fine, but it's not 1990. Today the tackle is borderline as an absolute best, if you think a tackle is legal as long as you touch the ball below knee height they you just don't know the rules.
You don't know how the referee or VAR viewed it, because it was offside. You only know that they didn't think it was a red card, which it wasn't. The "by some fans" is an extremely weird phrase. Go watch some games from the 90s and before, you'll see insane tackles that would be clear red cards now but no fouls then. The rules have changed.The rule is still the same, it's the interpretation of the rule that's different (by some fans and clearly not the referee or VAR). If that counts as excessive force for a challenge where he clearly won the ball then we might as well just ban sliding challenges. Luckily I thought the ref was decent today, I thought he had a good control over the game even if he didn't get every single decision right.
You can think it was a waste of time as much as you want, but why did you waste it by asking such a silly question? You can't make a list of all situations where it's a foul to touch the ball with your hands, it's literally impossible because you can touch the ball with your hands an infinite amount of ways. That doesn't mean you can't rule handballs.You're obviously talking about things you actually have no idea about. What a waste of time tbh.
ThisAs far as I'm aware it can't be a free/penalty if the player is offside but it can still be a red card.
I don't need a list. Find an instance where the the same tackle was a foul is enough. Of course after VAR was introduced.You don't know how the referee or VAR viewed it, because it was offside. You only know that they didn't think it was a red card, which it wasn't.
You can think it was a waste of time as much as you want, but why did you waste it by asking such a silly question? You can't make a list of all situations where it's a foul to touch the ball with your hands, it's literally impossible because you can touch the ball with your hands an infinite amount of ways. That doesn't mean you can't rule handballs.
Why? Find an instance where the same tackle wasn't a foul.I don't need a list. Find an instance where the the same tackle was a foul is enough. Of course after VAR was introduced.
No, in a lot of instances touching the ball with your leg low will not be a foul. In some instances it will be. It's not a very complicated concept.
Because you were the one who talked like you know at least one instance when it was a foul?Why? Find an instance where the same tackle wasn't a foul.
I'll repeat what I said. The rules have not changed, excessive force or being out of control were always potential reds. The interpretation has changed. And if that's even a foul rather than just a good challenge where he won the ball and took the man after then you might as well ban sliding challenges because it will be impossible to know what is permissible.You don't know how the referee or VAR viewed it, because it was offside. You only know that they didn't think it was a red card, which it wasn't. The "by some fans" is an extremely weird phrase. Go watch some games from the 90s and before, you'll see insane tackles that would be clear red cards now but no fouls then. The rules have changed.
You can think it was a waste of time as much as you want, but why did you waste it by asking such a silly question? You can't make a list of all situations where it's a foul to touch the ball with your hands, it's literally impossible because you can touch the ball with your hands an infinite amount of ways. That doesn't mean you can't rule handballs.
Exactly, they’re both sliding in for the challenge, whoever got to the ball first was going to leave something on the other. If it was from the side or from behind then it may be a pen if there was no offside but to call it a red card is bonkers.Won the ball, got some of the man, both Flew in, fair challenge
I thought you wanted an identical tackle to what Maguire did. If you just want an example where someone touching the ball with his leg below knee height results in a foul then I simply think you're lying if you say you haven't seen one, so I won't bother.Because you were the one who talked like you know at least one instance when it was a foul?
No I haven't. Since VAR was introduced.I thought you wanted an identical tackle to what Maguire did. If you just want an example where someone touching the ball with his leg below knee height results in a foul then I simply think you're lying if you say you haven't seen one, so I won't bother.
Of all the claims on this thread, this one really strikes me as odd. How can it have been late when he got to the ball before Digne did?That tackle was so late Arriva Buses Wales would be proud of it
Only thing that makes any sense. The ball is dead from the point of offside, so it can't be a penalty. But a red card can be given at any point. Just like if you punch someone going down the tunnel at half time.As far as I'm aware it can't be a free/penalty if the player is offside but it can still be a red card.
I don’t think we should have got a pen mate.Not only does Digne not get the ball first, he then makes contact with Maguire after. On what planet is that a penalty and not the other way around?
The ball is there to be won, They are both committed, going for the ball and Harry wins it cleanly first. They effectively kick each other and Digne is later than Maguire getting to the ball.Football is going too far the wrong way if this was not only a pen, but also a potential red card because of 'excessive force' by Maguire.
How can it be late when he got the ball?That tackle was so late Arriva Buses Wales would be proud of it
Thats what I was trying to say, people moan at a strong challenge and people moan when they're rolling around on the floor with the slightest bit of contact. Football is going down the pan if the Maguire challenge was a pen and red for the follow through.The ball is there to be won, They are both committed, going for the ball and Harry wins it cleanly first. They effectively kick each other and Digne is later than Maguire getting to the ball.
It’s not like he just about got a toe to it and then took the player out.
Ah right sorry misread your post as though you were saying it was a red.Thats what I was trying to say, people moan at a strong challenge and people moan when they're rolling around on the floor with the slightest bit of contact. Football is going down the pan if the Maguire challenge was a pen and red for the follow through.
I agree, Pickford was totally out of order...No attempt was made to play the ball by Pickford and he got nowhere near the ball, it was a penalty. Had Maguire booted Digne in the groin area and got nowhere near the ball and no penalty given, then I’d understand a thread being made.
Sent off for a challenge that hit the foot and none of the other dangerous areas? Woud be a truly moronic decision then.I agree, Pickford was totally out of order...
I think Maguire's tackle was a good one, he got the ball first but some referees and Var adjudicators see things differently and therefore Maguire could have been sent off ....