DomesticTadpole
Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
What do they mean 'old fashioned buffet'? Cheese and pineapple on sticks, sausage rolls, quiche?
Why would these so called executives and agents they asked not want to be named?No they aren’t - it’s no secret we are a shambles, it’s pretty fecking obvious given this transfer window alone.
I think your missing the point here. If United had won a game this article probably wouldn't have been written, yet the issues would still remain.Obviously their experience is that this isn't necessarily the case when it comes to United.
I really don't see how this is "click-baity nonsense." You get views from people in the business that you wouldn't otherwise read. Most of it seems reasonable to me.
Had United won one of the games would it have been written? No, things would have been the same at the club though.
.....so? If that's how it is at the club, then the article is valid. If Athletic had chose not to write it if united had won one of those games, then that's a problem of their editorial policy, not of Manchester United. Who cares.
I just frankly don't care. Why do they need to be going to competitors to dog pile on us? it's not interesting.You think United is being run poorly, but you're offended and dismissive to read about what professional competitors think about that? That's just stupid.
They don't need to be sophisticated when the problems that began 10 years ago still do not change.Mediocre analysis and an agend against United pretty much sums up the Atheltic.
TLDR:
Everyone but Utd fans think it is hilarious
Yes true, I go further than that, they are spot on!Good read - basically a collection of anonymous quotes from executives and staff at other clubs. As you'd expect, they're not very complimentary. They also seem generally reasonable, you don't get a sense of ABU mentality being behind it. All in all, they tend to back up the sort of general view of reality you'd get from reading this forum.
Agree. They have put all the things fans complain about and put it in one article but coming from other clubs chairman and officials.So, the main complaints from directors, managers, coaches, agents etc at rivals clubs seems to be:
Not especially ground breaking and, in fact, the type of stuff you read on here every day.
- Crap food for directors of other clubs
- United staff around the club seem unhappy and downtrodden
- OT looks "tired"
- Perception that the club is arrogant, living in the past and resting on their laurels. A sense of malaise.
- Murtough is 'competent' but lacks vision and doesn't have the required connections in the transfer market
- Confusing football structure - who is actually in charge?
- No sense of planning - scattergun approach to recruitment at all levels of playing and non-playing staff
- Have been left behind commercially
- As one director put it, United "has the sense of a big ship that hasn't been modernised for a long time and is going to take a long time to turn around"
That's exactly the point I'm not missing. And my point to that is that it seems to me irrelevant why The Athletic publish this article. Also, I think an assortment of views from professional competitors is actually one of the most useful things I've read on this issue. To call that "bile" and "trashy" is absurd.I think your missing the point here. If United had won a game this article probably wouldn't have been written, yet the issues would still remain.
The Athletic need to seel subscriptions, they do that by courting controversy alongside some good articles, this is a controversial article, as it's trying to claim that every other 'executive' (who all go nameless for some reason) think United are being run poorly.
Certainly there's an element of truth to it, for sure, but does it need this kind of trashy article to pinpoint it, not really. It's pandering to the bile spewing masses and is quite frankly low hanging fruit journalism.
Move it, football head!Hey Arnold!
The point there was that signing Gomez fits into a clear and well-understood club philosophy about what traits and characteristics they are looking for in a player in a given position. Everyone understands why they signed him. Whereas we, what exactly are we looking for in a full back?There are points in this article that i agree with and some i do not.
The bits i agree with were the fact we are seemingly ceding all the power for transfers to the manager.
Odd they picked Man City signing an unheralded full back as way to beat United up with when United also signed an unheralded full back for similar money
Think ETH understands what he wants in a fullback which is why he has signed a LB and wants a RB, what previous managers wanted goodness only knows.The point there was that signing Gomez fits into a clear and well-understood club philosophy about what traits and characteristics they are looking for in a player in a given position. Everyone understands why they signed him. Whereas we, what exactly are we looking for in a full back?
Hopefully yes, but the point is that United has failed to do what other clubs have, namely evolve a coherent vision of how the team plays and what qualities they're looking for in which positions. Without which recruitment becomes haphazard and disjointed, and so in the long run does the squad.Think ETH understands what he wants in a fullback which is why he has signed a LB and wants a RB, what previous managers wanted goodness only knows.
Exactly this.Athletic are fecking parasites. And these other clubs can feck off too. We’ve finished above the majority of them for years, even the recent ones.
I don't think that has done anything but compound the preexisting problem(s), tbh.It’s easy when two defeats equals a crisis too.
I see what you did thereMove it, football head!
This is Manchester United. The empire that crumbled away to dust in 9 years.
the immediate problem is getting back into the top 4 ... which I will be shocked if we manage this seasonTrust me folks
All this will change the day when we get back into top 4 and champions league
Attracting top players and staff wouldnt be a problem
Very difficult to see us getting in this year, which would mean missing out for two consecutive years for the first time since the inception of the UCL. I expect the top 5 will remain the same this season as last season (probably in the same order, too). With the impending changes to UCL qualification meaning it is likely we will soon have five UCL places in the Premier League, I can actually foresee a 'big 5' developing in future, with United unfortunately outside of it.the immediate problem is getting back into the top 4 ... which I will be shocked if we manage this season
Vol au ventsWhat do they mean 'old fashioned buffet'? Cheese and pineapple on sticks, sausage rolls, quiche?
They don't say "old fashioned buffet". Someone just mentioned that while many clubs have moved to buffets of modern food in the directors box, United is still serving an old-fashioned three-course meal. I don't think anyone imagines this is a big deal, it's just mentioned as an example of how things great and small generally give the appearance of being unchanging at Trafford.What do they mean 'old fashioned buffet'? Cheese and pineapple on sticks, sausage rolls, quiche?
Aren't the prawn sandwiches ordered "a la carte"??? Standards and all that??!!!'Old fashioned buffet' Still serving Prawn sandwiches, vol-au-vents and pigs in blankets?
Well, they should. As far as I can tell, they seem a model organisation. And as the case of United proves, that doesn't happen automatically just because you have money.Meh.
fair enough to point out our archaic structure, but when they start salivating over City's "modern approach" they lose me. The Athletic never loses a chance to exalt Manchester City while always skirting around the issue of their way off the market price "sponsorships" which make the whole thing possible.
Forgot about them.Vol au vents
You really think this is what's happened here? They just pretend that they've spoken to people and made up all the quotes? A publication that makes a living off subscriptions, as opposed to clicks? When they could instead just take the time to talk to people?It's very easy to "guess" what the atmosphere in the club must be (based on the public incompetence we've seen) and then make up "anonymous" sources to confirm what is already thought. I'm almost certain majority of reporting around United since the LVG era at least has followed this format.