Ayush_reddevil
Éire Abú
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2014
- Messages
- 14,939
I’d guess it’s £10-12m, with buy back at £20-25m and a 20-25% sell on. Still good business.Oh FFS Utd when will we get tougher on sale prices
Absolutely pathetic, so we are financially prudent when buying but not hard enough when selling5m it is
Yeah that's exactly the point I was trying to makeCoventry just paid 22.5 mil for Brighton’s backup young keeper. We should be getting similar.
Utterly disgraceful isn't it5 fecking million pounds.
Shamefully low price. Why do we never get good money for players?
Absolutely. City can make a profit twice on Trafford while we have to settle for this.Utterly disgraceful isn't it
I genuinely can't believe it, the guy was actually Bristol City's POTY last season and one of best in leagueAbsolutely. City can make a profit twice on Trafford while we have to settle for this.
Coventry just paid 22.5 mil for Brighton’s backup young keeper. We should be getting similar.
Lots of reasons, but in short, we bought a ton of expensive players who were not very good while not getting in younger talent from outside in the academy. So we never have players with first team exp and also at the age of 20-24 where the wages are not obscene5 fecking million pounds.
Shamefully low price. Why do we never get good money for players?
I am afraid it is trueTotally unacceptable to only be getting £5m if that is true. Should have been somewhere between £10-20m depending on the % of sell-on and buy-back fee.
Where are we getting these reports that it's only for 5M?5 fecking million pounds.
Shamefully low price. Why do we never get good money for players?
Coventry have pl money and had him on loan so know him wellCoventry just paid 22.5 mil for Brighton’s backup young keeper. We should be getting similar.
They're shitEverything is a loan. How is it we cannot shift these players?
So are other club's dross but they seem to go for wild fees.They're shit
Ours tend to be on too much money.So are other club's dross but they seem to go for wild fees.
Zirkzee is only on £100kOurs tend to be on too much money.
Which players have been as bad in the Prem as Zirkzee, Bayindir or Onana and went for wild money?So are other club's dross but they seem to go for wild fees.
Yeah but in general we over pay then can't shift. Hopefully this is changing.Zirkzee is only on £100k
What “decent” money were you expecting for Altay f**king Bayindir?! He’s rubbish. Didn’t cost us much. £2-4m was the height of my expectations.Death, taxes, and Manchester United's inability to sell a player for decent money
Which players have been as bad in the Prem as Zirkzee, Bayindir or Onana and went for wild money?
We have fact that clubs don't rate our dross as highly, no one wants any of themSo are other club's dross but they seem to go for wild fees.
Delap hasn't been sold and Trafford is a really good goalieNone maybe been as bad as Onana but you see the likes of Trafford and possibly Delap going up in value? Delap had a worse season than Zirkzee's first at Utd.
Now that I look though there's not as many as I thought so far tbf. Still think it's crazy we can't get Zirkzee sold for something like £15m. He's decent in a few areas, just shouldn't be a striker.
He wasn’t the best though. Rushworth was the best and the prude reflects this.I genuinely can't believe it, the guy was actually Bristol City's POTY last season and one of best in league
Why is it not decent? He only cost United 4.3m to buy so what’s the problem? He had t exactly set the works alight to justify a bigger feeDeath, taxes, and Manchester United's inability to sell a player for decent money
