FootballHQ
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2017
- Messages
- 18,256
- Supports
- Aston Villa
Anyone got a clue how to explain them?
Started off the season pretty well, were in top 6 with Haller scoring and Anderson and Yarmolenko in good form.
Last seen getting 1 point from home games v Palace, Newcastle and Sheffield United which isn't great and so sliding down the league now given they don't win many away games.
Way I see their team I think a front 4 of Haller-Anderson-Lanzini-Yarmolenko is potentially great but it dosen't seem to click all that often. You then have Rice in midfield who most rave about and then solid players like Diop at the back.
Guess Fabianski out injured for months has really hurt them at the back as the number 2 is nowhere near the standard.
Every season it seems West Ham spend loads in the market, start off o.k and then go on to achieve nothing but have a flirt with relegation.
Should they not be looking at Leicester and thinking there's not much between the two clubs yet Leicester look well set for top 4. It's not like they even have a poor manager, Pellegrini has done very good jobs at likes of Villareal and Malaga.
If you look at their last 30 years they have finished TWICE in the top 6 since the early 80s. As much as people give likes of Villa, Newcastle and Everton stick for not doing much recently, we've all finished multiple times in top 6 and played in europe far more recently. Leicester could easily finish top 6 twice in four seasons.
Just seems a strange strange club that get incredible levels of coverage for being London based. And winning a World cup.
Started off the season pretty well, were in top 6 with Haller scoring and Anderson and Yarmolenko in good form.
Last seen getting 1 point from home games v Palace, Newcastle and Sheffield United which isn't great and so sliding down the league now given they don't win many away games.
Way I see their team I think a front 4 of Haller-Anderson-Lanzini-Yarmolenko is potentially great but it dosen't seem to click all that often. You then have Rice in midfield who most rave about and then solid players like Diop at the back.
Guess Fabianski out injured for months has really hurt them at the back as the number 2 is nowhere near the standard.
Every season it seems West Ham spend loads in the market, start off o.k and then go on to achieve nothing but have a flirt with relegation.
Should they not be looking at Leicester and thinking there's not much between the two clubs yet Leicester look well set for top 4. It's not like they even have a poor manager, Pellegrini has done very good jobs at likes of Villareal and Malaga.
If you look at their last 30 years they have finished TWICE in the top 6 since the early 80s. As much as people give likes of Villa, Newcastle and Everton stick for not doing much recently, we've all finished multiple times in top 6 and played in europe far more recently. Leicester could easily finish top 6 twice in four seasons.
Just seems a strange strange club that get incredible levels of coverage for being London based. And winning a World cup.