Camilo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,939
I'm surprised betting advertising is still alowed in the U.K. They must be paying off the right people handsomely.
I've worked within the industry in the head office of one of the largest bookmakers in the country. Parts of my role included working closely with the responsible gambling department. On the other hand, I've also suffered from gambling addiction. There is alot more the bookmakers can do to combat problem gambling.I'm biased as I work for a gambling company myself, but I don't see the problem having betting companies as sponsors. People will bet if they want to anyways, it's their choice. Luckily, many betting companies nowadays have their own responsible gambling teams who are able to stop things before they go too far. However, unfortunately, RG people/risk analysts can't see everything. A lot of people don't know that many gambling companies have this RG focus as it never really gets any media coverage, and assume that we're only there to milk people for their money.
Addiction is everywhere though – see alcohol and even fast food, we can't ban ads for everything people get addicted to. I have never placed a bet at Marathonbet myself, even though they are associated with Manchester United.
Most people have addictions, it's how you control them, I just don't see an issue with betting companies advertising their products, like any other legal business.But it’s not up to you, not really. Most adverts aren’t designed around the product. They’re designed around the viewer. It’s all subconscious image association. No one drinks a coke like they do in ads, but when you watch it you’re being programmed to associate coke with the emotional response of joy. Everybody will try and deny it, but there’s a reason you see the same ads again and again and again.
Betting ads are designed to attack those that have issues with betting, because that’s their audience. They couldn’t care less about the guy who puts on a 10 spot on the odd game on a Saturday afternoon. It’s about the getting the poor guy that struggles with addiction to break and spend all his money.
I agree that bookmakers can do more to combat problem gambling, although some things they'll never be able to control. They're moving in the right direction though. For example, I like how the new Swedish gaming license (in 2019) will combat aggressive bonusing, only allowing the gambling company to offer one bonus during the customer lifetime (most likely the welcome bonus). Thus, all communication to the customer following this bonus will have to simply be informational. It'll be a challenge for the industry, but an interesting one in my opinion. The customer will (ideally) bet because he or she wants to, not purely because the company is pushing some bonus the customer feels like he or she has to use.I've worked within the industry in the head office of one of the largest bookmakers in the country. Parts of my role included working closely with the responsible gambling department. On the other hand, I've also suffered from gambling addiction. There is alot more the bookmakers can do to combat problem gambling.
I understand the very valid point that we all have free will. However the over exposure has to be addressed. Not only the over exposure but also the lack of prevention. Especially when it comes to online or mobile betting.
The advertisements are sickening too, and I can personally tell you. It can be pressing for a person battling addiction to endure those adverts throughout the entire match.
Why would it make you uncomfortable? It just a logo.Is anybody else uncomfortable with how many football teams are now sponsored by betting companies?
I know Man United turned down a deal with Mansion a few years back on ethical grounds, a rare occurance of course. But it seems like the majority of football clubs are sponsored by bookies these days, given the dangers of gambling and how impressionable kids are is it a good idea?
That's the raison d'etre of advertising, and it clearly works otherwise betting companies wouldn't be pumping money into it.Why would it make you uncomfortable? It just a logo.
I place a few 5 euro accumulators every month. If I'm watching the world cup and a betting ad or sponsored shirt pops up, it's not going to make me wanna bet. Same with Coca Cola, Carling, Sony Playstation..etc.
It's just advertising.
Porn lobbyists need to step up their game. Too flaccid.That's the raison d'etre of advertising, and it clearly works otherwise betting companies wouldn't be pumping money into it.
It is a bit odd how the government have begun cracking down on porn, but an addiction just as debilitating and capable of ruining lives, like betting, is given a free rein.
It is insane how much advertising there is on networks for betting. The money they get to spruik must be absolutely insane. "BET BET BET BETTTTTTTTTTTTTTT COME ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN BET...... gamble responsibly"...
If someone goes and gambles after seeing an advert like that then they are a numpty. Unless the person has a genuine and long term addiction that needs help, I find it weak and naive for people to be lead easily by adverts and sponsors. If you are 18+ and wish to gamble and can’t do it responsibly, only gambling what you are willing/can afford to lose, then it’s your own fault. Nobody else’s. But let’s just blame the tv advert and ignore the persons underlying greed to win money.It is insane how much advertising there is on networks for betting. The money they get to spruik must be absolutely insane. "BET BET BET BETTTTTTTTTTTTTTT COME ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN BET...... gamble responsibly"...
Nope, not what I said. Advertising in a manner that takes advantage of addictions is not simply advertising. Payday loans at just as bad, but different reason to betting companies advertising on sports matches. Its like smoking ads on school buses. Its calculated to prey on human weakness. Saying having a coke makes you smile every other ad break isnt going to hurt anyone, and if betting companies went about their ads in the same way it wouldnt be a big deal either. But when it becomes part of the show, its hard to see it for anything other than what it is. The addict has little choice than to avoid sports. That doesnt seem fair to me. At the very least the amount of betting ads could be calmed down during sports matches. In my opinion.Most people have addictions, it's how you control them, I just don't see an issue with betting companies advertising their products, like any other legal business.
If we really want to hammer a certain sector that advertise's to the vulnerable, then I'd go with 'payday loans'.
Take out "regular people" and insert "young people", my kids know more about betting than I do and I don't bet and mathematical psychology is my profession!If someone goes and gambles after seeing an advert like that then they are a numpty. Unless the person has a genuine and long term addiction that needs help, I find it weak and naive for people to be lead easily by adverts and sponsors. If you are 18+ and wish to gamble and can’t do it responsibly, only gambling what you are willing/can afford to lose, then it’s your own fault. Nobody else’s. But let’s just blame the tv advert and ignore the persons underlying greed to win money.
I have probably thirty accounts with online bookies, the vast majority are either closed or factored hugely (they don’t want winning punters).Must be horrible to have that kind of predisposition. I've never been a gambler, but I remember the one time a few decades ago where I wasted a few hundred quid on a slot machine, because i "knew" that it was about to burst. It didn't, of course, and fortunately I just cut my losses and accepted defeat, and never tried to regain what I had lost.
In addition, it's not just the commercials. Once you're a heavy gambler, the companies will contact you, offer you gifts, special offers and whatnot, just to keep the money flowing in. I've read some pretty disturbing accounts of how people have tried to make a clean break, but have been hauled back in by agents, treating you as a special "friend" of the company.
If you self exclude you're only going to self exclude from that bookmaker.I have probably thirty accounts with online bookies, the vast majority are either closed or factored hugely (they don’t want winning punters).
The ones I’ve left dormant I get loads of emails with welcome back bonuses. That’s just smart marketing. Only issue for me is it takes time to clear a bonus when they only let you get 50p a time so not worth the hassle.
The only way to cut yourself off completely is to self exclude which means you have to admit you have a problem which people generally don’t do.
Soon you'll be able to exclude yourself from all online gambling sites, thanks to initiatives such as GamStop in the UK. Hopefully other countries will follow suit. It's a good start, but this only covers online gambling.If you self exclude you're only going to self exclude from that bookmaker.
You'll always still be able to bet, simply register online for a different bookmaker. Pop in person to your local bookmaker/casino.
In my opinion the self exclusion element could be worked on more. It does have to be said there is only so much you can do to prevent it, however when you sign a self exclusion form, their duty of care and exeution of the service should be greater.
That's interesting and exactly the kind of action I was referring to. Fair play for that.Soon you'll be able to exclude yourself from all online gambling sites, thanks to initiatives such as GamStop in the UK. Hopefully other countries will follow suit. It's a good start, but this only covers online gambling.
Agree you only self exclude from that bookie and that’s something UK could do better. In France for example there is a national black list so if you exclude from one you exclude from all.If you self exclude you're only going to self exclude from that bookmaker.
You'll always still be able to bet, simply register online for a different bookmaker. Pop in person to your local bookmaker/casino.
In my opinion the self exclusion element could be worked on more. It does have to be said there is only so much you can do to prevent it, however when you sign a self exclusion form, their duty of care and exeution of the service should be greater.
I agree.If you gamble and are swayed or triggered by sponsorships and adverts then I’m sorry, but that individual is likely to gamble anyway even without the triggers as gambling is an addiction. We cannot blame adverts or sponsors. It’s individual choice and we are all told to gamble responsibility. Do I buy a Chevrolet as they are on the United jersey? No.
Humans need to stop looking for excuses for everything.