
They all are on Stricklands nuts. He has done nothing while on top.
Colby was worseHas there been much more of a dislikable fighter in the UFC than Khamzat? Disliked many over the years but there’s just nothing likeable about him. Sadly see the result tomorrow night only going one way.
Right decision. Though split decision shows how close it was.
Good show of respect there at the end. Not that I particularly like either of these guys
It just shows how they fake all the animosity to sell the fight. Strickland basically just admitted it in his interview. 2 unlikeable cnuts still.Right decision. Though split decision shows how close it was.
Good show of respect there at the end. Not that I particularly like either of these guys
It just shows how they fake all the animosity to sell the fight. Strickland basically just admitted it in his interview. 2 unlikeable cnuts still.
Think we knew that from the start of round one. If they truly hated each other, no way they would of slapped hands.Colby was worse
Nah half of Colby is a made up WWE character tbh and you just have to take it for what it is, a ridiculously over the top character that he’s playing. That’s not the case with Khamzat.
I kept saying that people are underestimating Strickland's wrestling and ability to get up. He made Khamzat spend more energy than himself in the R1. Only Burns and Usman gave Khamzat a run for his money on the ground and he quickly backed out from trying to wrestle/grapple with them.
Khamzat's cardio is one of the absolute worst I've seen from a championship caliber fighter.
All he did was throw jabs.Rogan was blaming Khamzat's performance on his massive weight cut. Not that I usually agree with Rogan, but there may be a bit of truth to that since Strickland didn't exactly deliver a dominant performance.
All he did was throw jabs.
Holy shit, did not stay up for it as I thought it was a forgone conclusion
Was Strickland amazing? Or Khamzat awful?
Somebody break it down for me
Chiv gassed.Holy shit, did not stay up for it as I thought it was a forgone conclusion
Was Strickland amazing? Or Khamzat awful?
Somebody break it down for me
To be honest, fighters with historically poor cardio will always have issues after cutting weight. He probably cut a fair amount but I don't believe what Roundtree is claiming, 20kg worth of weight.Rogan was blaming Khamzat's performance on his massive weight cut. Not that I usually agree with Rogan, but there may be a bit of truth to that since Strickland didn't exactly deliver a dominant performance.
Thanks. I’ll have to watch it in full as I just assumed Khamzat would ragdoll him ala driscus & Bobby.Khamzat came out strong and took round 1 with a takedown and ground control
Strickland somehow managed to thwart one of Khamzat's take down attempts in round two and wound up on top, scoring some good strikes on him to win the round.
Round three was mostly standup and Strickland seemed to win it.
Khamzat got a second wind in round 4 and got the better of Sean.
Round 5 was close as well, but ultimately Strickland's constant volume of jabs probably won the him the round and the fight.
I keep saying this for months, DDP offered no resistance to Khamzat, he had 0 defensive wrestling. Khamzat spent less energy on 5 rounds against DDP than he did in 1 round against Strickland. Strickland has legit defensive wrestling.Always thought it was mental people assumed Khamzat now just had a good gas tank after the DPP fight. He barely needed to get out of second gear in that fight. Entirely unsurprising that he was gassed by round 2 especially after that weight cut.
That said I thought he might have edged it to honest, definitely seemed to edge the damage on the feet and landed a greater variety of shots with Sean mostly just marking him up with the jab and little else.
Must say, to me, Strickland looked a bit bigger than Khamzat inside the cage.Was a bit weird how gassed Chimaev looked in round 2, and he didn't look much bigger than Strickland for it to be the weight cut, maybe it's some lingering effects from those health issues he had a few years ago. Whatever the reason, once he couldn't push the action and ragdoll Sean like he wanted it became a typical Strickland fight with him sticking him with the jab and out pointing him, though it was close. Thought it was interesting to see Van and Strickland win against elite grapplers by jabbing their face off, disrupting their pressure so they couldn't back them against the fence and shoot, 2 competitive fights and matchups that I'm sure we'll see again in the future.
There definitely wasn't a huge difference in size and I see his brother has come out talking about how his body shut down during the cut and that he was preparing for a fight against Jiri at 205, I dunno, he was a big 170lb but he looks a natural middleweight to me.Must say, to me, Strickland looked a bit bigger than Khamzat inside the cage.
For sure, he is a natural middleweight. Light heavyweight talks are crazy. For as good as his wrestling is, those guys are all large.There definitely wasn't a huge difference in size and I see his brother has come out talking about how his body shut down during the cut and that he was preparing for a fight against Jiri at 205, I dunno, he was a big 170lb but he looks a natural middleweight to me.
There definitely wasn't a huge difference in size and I see his brother has come out talking about how his body shut down during the cut and that he was preparing for a fight against Jiri at 205, I dunno, he was a big 170lb but he looks a natural middleweight to me.