The Premier League/FA should kick out all the billionaire owners

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
Get rid of glazers and all the other blood sucking leeches from the game. The PL/FA won't get a better opportunity because its in there own interest and most of the fans will be agreeable with the decision.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Get rid of glazers and all the other blood sucking leeches from the game. The PL/FA won't get a better opportunity because its in there own interest and most of the fans will be agreeable with the decision.
how?

these are businesses. I get the sentiment, but not possible, not legal.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,504
Location
Oslo, Norway
Good idea. They totally won't be sued to death if they tried doing that.
 

Reditus

Lineup Prediction League Winner 2021-22
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
5,561
Do we ask them nicely to leave?
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
Personally, I am surprised KSA are going for Newcastle and not a West Ham. I would've thought if they couldn't get their hands on a Utd, Liverpool or Arsenal they would go for a non entity London club rather than one from the North.
how?

these are businesses. I get the sentiment, but not possible, not legal.
Good idea. They totally won't be sued to death if they tried doing that.
The government can use its sovereign powers and nationalise the clubs and then release them immediately after.
 

Paxi

Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
27,678
Good idea. They totally won't be sued to death if they tried doing that.
Samid you old dog you. You know we'd fecking overrun this place. You twats did before, how hard could it be?
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Yes you can, if government get involved they can basically do whatever they please. I don't know where this idea seems to have come from that businesses are somehow all powerful.
no UK government would do this. Technically it’s possible, of course, but there’s zero chance of it happening in reality. Ergo my definitive statement.
 

cjj

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2017
Messages
697
Supports
Spurs
The government can use its sovereign powers and nationalise the clubs and then release them immediately after.
Wait, so the government would buy the clubs at going rate, then immediately give them away?

There's a reason clubs are owned by billionaires - because they are worth hundreds of millions.

I can only imagine there's a misunderstanding of basic economics here
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
Wait, so the government would buy the clubs at going rate, then immediately give them away?

There's a reason clubs are owned by billionaires - because they are worth hundreds of millions.

I can only imagine there's a misunderstanding of basic economics here
Nationalization refers to the action of a government taking control of a company or industry, which generally occurs without compensation for the loss of the net worth of seized assets and potential income. The action may be the result of a nation's attempt to consolidate power, resentment of foreign ownership of industries representing significant importance to local economies or to prop up failing industries.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nationalization.asp
 

cjj

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2017
Messages
697
Supports
Spurs
Nationalization refers to the action of a government taking control of a company or industry, which generally occurs without compensation for the loss of the net worth of seized assets and potential income. The action may be the result of a nation's attempt to consolidate power, resentment of foreign ownership of industries representing significant importance to local economies or to prop up failing industries.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nationalization.asp
Again, basic economics. It is illegal in the EU and UK to "confiscate" property that is legally owned without sufficient reason.

In short, your copy and paste response is nonsense. You can't just "nationalise'" things for free, or else the government would be sued heavily and for good reason.

This is the UK, not the Soviet Union.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,691
I fully support this, comrade. Leicester's would most likely have to go too
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
1,424
Get rid of glazers and all the other blood sucking leeches from the game. The PL/FA won't get a better opportunity because its in there own interest and most of the fans will be agreeable with the decision.
The main person behind this, and first President of the ESL is Perez he’s not the owner of Real Madrid just the president who seems to have been there forever
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
Again, basic economics. It is illegal in the EU and UK to "confiscate" property that is legally owned without sufficient reason.

In short, your copy and paste response is nonsense. You can't just "nationalise'" things for free, or else the government would be sued heavily and for good reason.

This is the UK, not the Soviet Union.
Just because politicians arse lick big corporations doesn't mean governments are powerless. The government can tomorrow pass a law in parliament banning foreign ownership in football and the club owners can't do shit about it. Nationalization is recognized by international law aswell. Sufficient reason is that it is "public purpose". Check the following link and learn what powers governments have:

In May 2019, Labour announced its detailed plan to nationalise electricity and gas transmission and distribution companies. The plan, entitled “Bringing Energy Home”, provides that the nationalisation would be effected by an Act of Parliament with a two-step process: (i) the assets are transferred into public ownership; and (ii) provision is made for compensating the former owners through a bond issuance by the Treasury. Labour has previously stated that the compensation should relate to the book value of the companies, but in Bringing Energy Home, it explicitly stated that the level of compensation should be decided by Parliament.

Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the ECHR (incorporated into English law under the Human Rights Act 1998), which affords individuals and companies the right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions. Under the Article, the UK would have the right to nationalise assets, but only insofar as this is “in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law”. While these principles give Member States a wide margin of appreciation as to what constitutes “in the public interest” so as to allow for nationalisation, these principles also provide a right to reasonable compensation for affected parties. Previous case law provides that:

• Compensation must be of an amount reasonably related to the value of the property.
Compensation does not necessarily entail the full market value of the property if the legitimate objective of the public interest justifies less than full reimbursement
• The valuation method for calculating compensation must be “manifestly reasonable”, although in practice the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) has granted national authorities wide discretion in this area and will generally respect their approach unless it is “manifestly without reasonable foundation”

As far as UK not being Soviet Union is concerned, you should read up on pre & post war nationalisation of various industries by the british government through various acts of parliament where private businesses were taken over for a pittance in "public interest". Power of a government is the same everywhere whether it is the UK, Soviet Union or Timbuktu.
 

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
18,994
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.
The OP's sentiment is silly but the rule about a minimum level of fan ownership from Germany is a good one and should be adopted in the UK.
Agree. Historical English clubs being bought by imposters that don't even know how offside works that are now planning to destroy our league and our clubs history is fecking unacceptable.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,326
It would be great if they did but it will never happen. It would have been much easier to not allow foreign billionaires and Oil states to buy English football clubs in the first place but the PL and FA didn't give a feck. This has been inevitable for about 20 years. They allowed them in so they shouldn't be surprised that they want to completely change English football.
 

Gasolin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
6,106
Location
NYC
The FA or the PL can’t. At best this is a political topic and I don’t know if it’s really possible.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,625
Location
London
The government can use its sovereign powers and nationalise the clubs and then release them immediately after.
Luckily, the courts would say the government to feck themselves, and then government would need to pay fess to those clubs.

Clubs are private businesses, not nuclear weapons that endanger the security of the country. There are thousands of clubs in England, if 6 want to leave, they will leave and the government can do feck all about it.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,734
Location
Rectum
It´s really something to see Boris Johnson advocate that clubs shouldn´t break from their partnering organizations because they aren´t happy with their deal..
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,180
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Even if this was possible, not a chance in hell it happens. Have you even considered the damage to a country's reputation a move like this will cause? It would far, far outweigh any gain of keeping 6 football clubs.
 

Lastwolf

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,733
Location
Brick Sofa
Just because politicians arse lick big corporations doesn't mean governments are powerless. The government can tomorrow pass a law in parliament banning foreign ownership in football and the club owners can't do shit about it. Nationalization is recognized by international law aswell. Sufficient reason is that it is "public purpose". Check the following link and learn what powers governments have:
• Compensation must be of an amount reasonably related to the value of the property.
Compensation does not necessarily entail the full market value of the property if the legitimate objective of the public interest justifies less than full reimbursement
• The valuation method for calculating compensation must be “manifestly reasonable”, although in practice the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) has granted national authorities wide discretion in this area and will generally respect their approach unless it is “manifestly without reasonable foundation”
Nationalising the premier league would cost about 10-15 billion and you'd end up with a farcical situations like United still owing 400mil on bank loans used to purchase itself, while being nolonger owned by the people that walked away with 3billion.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,311
Everybody thinks the PL are opposing this out of the goodness of their hearts :lol:

They're just pissed off there won't be as much money for them. They want the billionaires. They just want them in their own league.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,300
Governments won't do a thing. If they threatened to, current moral victors Chelsea and City will be the first to get back onto the ESL bandwagon.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,300
Everybody thinks the PL are opposing this out of the goodness of their hearts :lol:

They're just pissed off there won't be as much money for them. They want the billionaires. They just want them in their own league.
Same with the governments
 

choccy77

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
6,059
no UK government would do this. Technically it’s possible, of course, but there’s zero chance of it happening in reality. Ergo my definitive statement.
Yeah UK gov are reliant on American businesses and also America, they will not do anything to harm this.
 

Pathwayz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 25, 2020
Messages
10
Supports
Chelsea
Get rid of glazers and all the other blood sucking leeches from the game. The PL/FA won't get a better opportunity because its in there own interest and most of the fans will be agreeable with the decision.
I hope Roman Abrahamovic and sheik mansour does not fall into the category of leeches.
They have done more for the clubs than they have gotten back.

The last thing we want is an era of Manchester United dominance unchallenged.