The team is still awful in possession

King7Eric

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
3,077
Location
Cardiff
For starters it would help if Casemiro stopped trying to do everything first time. Even in space he never wants to take a touch. We are far too dependant on Shaw for ball progression and we need more outlets when it comes to ball retention in the middle third. Being in possession isn't about passing it around the opponent, it also means being able to hold it under pressure, which players like Casemiro, Eriksen, Lindelof, Fred, Malacia are terrible at. Someone like FDJ who can ride challenges and is good in tight spaces is desperately needed to reduce our dependence on Shaw.
 

AlPistacho

New Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2022
Messages
1,782
Varane out since then and then Antony says a lot
Those were the two best players I had in mind. Also I think Ronaldo starting 4 or so games hindered us a bit. A team can’t turn on and off the playing side of things. It comes with momentum
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,750
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
But isn’t that because our players aren’t good at possession football?

In terms of just straight up ability on the ball, I’d rank the side something like this:

De Gea - poor on the ball;
Dalot - good ball progressor, but average on the ball when pressed and just generally;
Varane - average on the ball
Martinez - top tier
Shaw - very good. Press resistant, good ball progressor. Weakness is that he’s very one footed;
Casemiro - average/poor under the press, good long range pass when in space (suits counter attacking)
Eriksen - average/poor under press, good passer when given time, very two footed (suits counter attacking)
Fernandes - creative juggernaut but treats the ball like lava. Can’t dribble
Rashford - poor/average; very much a counter attacker;
Antony - very good at ball retention, can also dribble;
Sancho - quite good at ball retention, but a lot of timid passes
Martial - very good at holding the ball and playing under pressure;
McFred - both better off the ball than on it. Very much counter attacking players who are poor with the ball.
Of course, one thing is influencing the other. De Gea not being able to play out of the back is probably one reason, the rise of all team playing pressing is another one, it makes it all the more difficult to keep possession, and you need a team that is really built with players who can keep a high 80% or even 90% passing accuracy against teams like that, which imo only City is really able of doing.

Which means the way we play football is probably a mix of things, pressing and counter pressing is the current football "meta", we don't have the most technically and tactically gifted team and EtH is practical enough to not play football that doesn't suite our team.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,172
I do think that at times we play long when needed by design, and are not as obssessed with possesion just yet.

After the first two games we clearly abandoned playing out from the back intially until we got some results and confidence. Then we started to focus on possesion. Unfortunately, we again lost key players and that made us go back to being pragmatic.

Today was one such occasion, I think. They were pressing high and had a fairly high defensive line. Going direct and using the oace we had was not a bad tactic at all. If we had finished better we should then have been cruising to a win.
 

CloneMC16

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
4,391
Casemiro was giving the ball away for fun today. We're lucky it didn't cost us more than it did. He also tried a bunch of first time passes that weren't coming off. His long range passing has actually surprised me. It's quite good, but his short passing is pretty average. He's had a few games where he's given a bunch of really easy passes away in dangerous positions.

Bruno also gave it away a lot.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,014
I agree with people saying it's more of a personnel problem and there's nothing much Ten Hag can do with some of these players.

I like Casemiro but it makes you wonder if buying a midfielder for £60m who contributes to this problem was the best allocation of resources in the summer.
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,446
Location
Manchester

Oldyella

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
5,756
As a former manager used to say, it's a process. A process that only began a few months ago.

Personally I think our back five has noticably improved in possession, so that's something for a start.
That's a change in personell though isn't it? Dalot and Martinez in and Maguire and AWB has made a huge difference. De Gea looks a lot better I guess if we include him.

Not worried though, still early days and we have shown in some games we are more than capable, just getting consistent in it that's next.
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
After adding two midfielders and a ball-playing defender, we still can't control games consistently.

2 of our midfielders today had 67% passing accuracy. We're 8th in the PL for passes completed per 90 and 10th for passing accuracy percentage.

What's the solution?
Today, the two biggest issues by far were:
— Without Antony and with Elanga on the right , you shut us down fairly easy. If Antony played, he would have received a lot of passes deep on the right side. Now Fulham just centralized it’s defense and stifled us.

And this effect is like 3x — when you don’t have a right foot at RB. We really missed Antony.

— Bruno must stop to go for the killer ball as much as he does. Listen to ETH’s PC after the Villa game, he really calls it out. And what did he do today? Just keeps going for the Hail Mary pass.

Also, De Gea had quite many poor distributions today.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,548
Location
Somewhere out there
I agree with people saying it's more of a personnel problem and there's nothing much Ten Hag can do with some of these players.

I like Casemiro but it makes you wonder if buying a midfielder for £60m who contributes to this problem was the best allocation of resources in the summer.
Fuxk me, no player is allowed an off game around these parts.
He’s been absolutely incredible for the past 6 weeks.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,554
THis one against Fullham (source: whoscored.com). Let see players type of pass, passing rate, and their involvement in game.



- We have a DM and CB who were the worst culprit of long ball to nowhere (look that LB and AccLB), with accuracy 20-30%, with DDG as the next one.

- Then Casemiro's as DM had a nightmare with 67% passing rate, while only creating 1 key pass (compare to Bruno who had similar passing rate but could easily have 4 assists today). And Martinez had his worst passing game, with ~80% as a CB.

- THen look at the wingers in Rashford and Elanga. Rashford wasn't that much involved and didn't create key pass (hmm.., I remember he made a good pass to Malacia's chance), and still have 74% passing rate. Then Elanga's involvement was 15 passes in 54 minutes with no key pass.

- There's McTom playing in midfield with 100% passing rate, but 3 passes in about 40 min. on the pitch.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
13,881
I don't want to get jumped on, but Rashford and Elanga are really terrible on the ball way too often.

Ideally I'd want Antony right and Garnacho /Sancho left with Rashford off the bench.
I was about to write something similar.

You cannot expect to hit 65/70% possession just from your midfield and defence. Our forwards, including Bruno and Ronaldo, just cannot keep the ball.

Compare Bruno to De Bruyne and you have your answer.

With Martial and Antony back in the side, I think we'll improve massively in this department but Rashford doesn't have it in him to do possession football. Play Garnacho on the left, Antony on the right and Tony through the middle and I'd be interested to see the result
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
2 of our better players are notoriously questionable in possession, that one doesn't seem to be going away but today for the most part was the fringe players like Malacia and Elanga. The others couldn't carry what we lost in possession from Dalot and Antony's absence. It just put more of the possession creation burden on players who could do without.
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,430
Location
London
The biggest reason why we’re so bad in possession is because our players are too far away from each other and they’re not very good at ‘getting to a ball’ first. We lose so many duels it’s ridiculous.
Ten Hag can’t be absolved of blame as he sets the team up. When Casemiro receives the ball, a lot of the time Bruno and Eriksen are too far ahead of him.
Our two wide players are also too wide and so the only possible passes open to Casemiro are ‘longer passes’ and if we’re playing a team (as we did today) who have players who are capable of intercepting and pressing then those passes from Casemiro will go incomplete. Against spurs it worked because spurs’ midfield applied no pressure to our midfield. Nobody was combative. Games like today you need your players tighter together when in possession. We don’t seem to be able to get that balance right.

The other thing I’ve noticed is when we play against high line defences we try too much and too soon to play in our forward players and so we concede the ball a lot. Against spurs again that didn’t happen because spurs sat deep so we actually had to think about our passes.

Also Bruno Fernandes is basically the anti christ when it comes to keeping possession. At some stage ETH is going to have to have serious words with this guy about his wasting of possession. Bruno as well as rashford and Elanga are a recipe for disaster when it comes to
Keeping ball possession because they are way too erratic with the ball.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,607
Location
London
We’ve lost key players and we’ve played a lot of games in the last 6 weeks. Fulham have been playing 1 a week. Villa the same.

Despite this, we have a clear attacking plan now and we defend far better as a team than we have in years. Antony was making a big difference because one of our huge failings in recent years was our threat only came down the left, so teams could double up on that side. With Dalot and Antony we were causing threat on both sides and it was opening up the middle too.
Not true, we had Greenwood the two years prior and he was a huge threat from the right. What was missing was a good RB at the time.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,251
Ridiculous and false statement.
You only need to look at the players ETH has inherited. Their passing hasn't improved.

The guys he has brought in, they're the players who've improved our passing.

It's undeniable.
 

GaryLifo

Liverpool's Secret Weapon.
Joined
Feb 26, 2001
Messages
10,735
Location
From here to there
Not true, we had Greenwood the two years prior and he was a huge threat from the right. What was missing was a good RB at the time.
So what I said about Dalot and Antony being the threat on the right this season compared to before is actually true then. Glad you agree
 

Lord Zlatan

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
712
Location
Ireland
Brunos stats are great but hes a liability. So careless with the ball. Nearly cost us the game against West Ham, back heel flicks on edge of his own box today and wtf was he trying for their goal. Yes his energy and work rate is good, but hes sloppy and some of his decisions are brain dead. needs to be more careful with the ball.
 

WirralRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 9, 2022
Messages
157
Got to remember as well we have been playing at least 2 games a week for a long period, with a lot of injuries meaning the players who are fit are playing most games, a lot of teams are struggling with this who are in Europe.
 

Mullet_Man

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 16, 2011
Messages
478
It's frustrating when we still hoof it forward yes but I think EtH knows we are better as an counter attacking team so I guess he's trying to not force it, it will come in time hopefully when we have a fully fit squad and reinforcements.

I mean if you look at how much better De Gea is over those early few games it shows we are making progress if slowly.
 

3KDré

Full Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
6,575
You only need to look at the players ETH has inherited. Their passing hasn't improved.

The guys he has brought in, they're the players who've improved our passing.

It's undeniable.
Have you not been watching De Gea recently? Varane's has improved too (still not a strength of his) and Dalot is in the form of his life. Bruno is also giving the ball away far far less.
 

A-man

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
6,314
THis one against Fullham (source: whoscored.com). Let see players type of pass, passing rate, and their involvement in game.



- We have a DM and CB who were the worst culprit of long ball to nowhere (look that LB and AccLB), with accuracy 20-30%, with DDG as the next one.

- Then Casemiro's as DM had a nightmare with 67% passing rate, while only creating 1 key pass (compare to Bruno who had similar passing rate but could easily have 4 assists today). And Martinez had his worst passing game, with ~80% as a CB.

- THen look at the wingers in Rashford and Elanga. Rashford wasn't that much involved and didn't create key pass (hmm.., I remember he made a good pass to Malacia's chance), and still have 74% passing rate. Then Elanga's involvement was 15 passes in 54 minutes with no key pass.

- There's McTom playing in midfield with 100% passing rate, but 3 passes in about 40 min. on the pitch.
I think occasional long balls from CBs or midfielders are good, as they open up and force their defence to back up a little, but we have been very wasteful lately. The stats you show, that’s 16 lost possessions from 2 players. I’m really wondering if so many long balls are according to the instructions for ETH.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,548
Location
Somewhere out there
I think occasional long balls from CBs or midfielders are good, as they open up and force their defence to back up a little, but we have been very wasteful lately. The stats you show, that’s 16 lost possessions from 2 players. I’m really wondering if so many long balls are according to the instructions for ETH.
Since Antony went out of the side our safe out ball has gone, that David Silva/Bernardinho/Iniesta ball if you like, and with it the passing stats from our CB’s and midfielders have taken a real hit. So many times today I could see that Casemiro and Martinez had absolutely no options whatsoever, only players under severe pressure. That’s where Antony comes in.
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,373
We had a keeper who we all know is awful with his feet, a young left back who’s just joined the club playing at right back, a lightweight centre back with zero pace and struggles being pressed on the pitch and a right sided attacker who is basically in the squad to fill numbers so we were never going to dominate possession today.

Wait til Varane, Dalot and Antony are all back and Martial is hopefully fully fit and see how we are then but we’re 2-3 months into ETH’s reign in which he still wants a ball playing keeper, a deep lying playmaker that can drive forward and a fluid striker that can link play but also get in behind to have a starting 11 in his mould.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,888
I blame it on Maguire, possibly McTominay, maybe Lindelgod or potentially Shaw for being slightly overweight.

Some of the threads that are created and allowed on here are just insane sometimes :lol:
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,251
Its very much deniable. Stop making absolute statements with no facts at all.
For starters its an opinion but I've tried to back it up by pointing out the players he inherited haven't really improved in terms of passing and ball retention.

You saw midweek, forced to essentially play the same XI Ole had last season, we reverted back to the same football as last season.

The lads we've brought in are responsible for our improved ball retention.

But if you think last seasons first XI have improved with the ball fair enough. To me they look the same.

If we want to improve further, new faces will be required no doubt. You can't coach players in their mid to late 20's to suddenly pass the ball better or have a better first and second touch.

That's why ETH bought a new midfield.


Have you not been watching De Gea recently? Varane's has improved too (still not a strength of his) and Dalot is in the form of his life. Bruno is also giving the ball away far far less.
Dalot is the only one who has significantly improved with his use of the ball but I'd suggest that's a young player developing. He's improved at everything.

If ETH had to go back to using the players we had last season, without his new signings, we'd be right back to the terrible passimg we saw before.

Guys this is why ETH and every manager around buys new players. It's why he'll buy even more players who can look after the ball better.
 

A-man

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
6,314
Since Antony went out of the side our safe out ball has gone, that David Silva/Bernardinho/Iniesta ball if you like, and with it the passing stats from our CB’s and midfielders have taken a real hit. So many times today I could see that Casemiro and Martinez had absolutely no options whatsoever, only players under severe pressure. That’s where Antony comes in.
Could be, I haven’t really thought about it in that way. Some of those missed long balls were poor execution when they were pressed, and we need to be calmer under press, But some were without any stress at all, just poor patience.
 

RedOrange

Full Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2015
Messages
1,124
- We have a DM and CB who were the worst culprit of long ball to nowhere (look that LB and AccLB), with accuracy 20-30%, with DDG as the next one.
The two players who had the most were Martinez, because he's basically making everything happen with the ball in the back line, and Casemiro, who gets the ball a fair bit as a main passing option for De Gea and Martinez playing out from the back. They both put a lot of long balls over the top because Fulham was pressing a lot with a lot of players committed forward and a high line. Playing over the top to pacey forwards is exactly how you're supposed to play against that strategy, we just didn't get a goal from it directly, although we came close a few times.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,554
The two players who had the most were Martinez, because he's basically making everything happen with the ball in the back line, and Casemiro, who gets the ball a fair bit as a main passing option for De Gea and Martinez playing out from the back. They both put a lot of long balls over the top because Fulham was pressing a lot with a lot of players committed forward and a high line. Playing over the top to pacey forwards is exactly how you're supposed to play against that strategy, we just didn't get a goal from it directly, although we came close a few times.
My post was to answer the OP question of why we're still awful in possession. Having a (probably) right strategy but awful execution is why this thread is created, i guess.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
16,977
We were improving in this regard, but have gone back to bad habits a bit recently.

Some of the decision making by some of our players is criminal.

We'll get there.
 

Ramshock

CAF Pilib De Brún Translator
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
45,425
Location
Swimming against a tide of idiots and spoofers
For starters its an opinion but I've tried to back it up by pointing out the players he inherited haven't really improved in terms of passing and ball retention.

You saw midweek, forced to essentially play the same XI Ole had last season, we reverted back to the same football as last season.

The lads we've brought in are responsible for our improved ball retention.

But if you think last seasons first XI have improved with the ball fair enough. To me they look the same.

If we want to improve further, new faces will be required no doubt. You can't coach players in their mid to late 20's to suddenly pass the ball better or have a better first and second touch.

That's why ETH bought a new midfield.




Dalot is the only one who has significantly improved with his use of the ball but I'd suggest that's a young player developing. He's improved at everything.

If ETH had to go back to using the players we had last season, without his new signings, we'd be right back to the terrible passimg we saw before.

Guys this is why ETH and every manager around buys new players. It's why he'll buy even more players who can look after the ball better.
Nope
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,340
But isn’t that because our players aren’t good at possession football?

In terms of just straight up ability on the ball, I’d rank the side something like this:

De Gea - poor on the ball;
Dalot - good ball progressor, but average on the ball when pressed and just generally;
Varane - average on the ball
Martinez - top tier
Shaw - very good. Press resistant, good ball progressor. Weakness is that he’s very one footed;
Casemiro - average/poor under the press, good long range pass when in space (suits counter attacking)
Eriksen - average/poor under press, good passer when given time, very two footed (suits counter attacking)
Fernandes - creative juggernaut but treats the ball like lava. Can’t dribble
Rashford - poor/average; very much a counter attacker;
Antony - very good at ball retention, can also dribble;
Sancho - quite good at ball retention, but a lot of timid passes
Martial - very good at holding the ball and playing under pressure;
McFred - both better off the ball than on it. Very much counter attacking players who are poor with the ball.
Agree. Martinez and Antony are 2 of the 4 you correctly point out as fitting possession football and they are 2 of the 3 Ten Hag signings (Malacia the other, let's assume Casemiro wasn't but he said yes spend huge on a quality DM even if it leaves me with less money later, I need one to survive this season). And Eriksen is the other and he's very capable of possession football as a #10 looking to get wide and overload areas with the fullbacks and wingers and hit crosses and through balls, just can't really turn that well and dribble from deep like Ten Hag's first choice for the spot in De Jong.

So my guess is we'll keep playing this sort of football that emphasizes linking up quickly and directly in possession and as we sign more Ten Hag players we'll get more and more possession.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,140
Location
Croatia
Given the circumstances it's actually great and ton bettet than last year. Of course from time to time it's bad like yesterday but generally there's been a big progression in that department.