The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.

GiddyUp

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
4,913
At this point I would love to see trump in a fist fight. The satisfaction I would get from watching this "tough guy" take a slap. Him v's Kathy Griffin would be hilarious.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
41,794
Location
Florida

oneniltothearsenal

Caf's Milton Friedman and Arse Aficionado
Scout
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
11,153
Supports
Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,647
Location
Australia
At a campaign rally in Michigan Saturday afternoon, President Donald Trump joked about being called a fascist by his critics and got the crowd of his supporters to chant “twelve more years.”


“Now you really drive them crazy if you say twelve more years, twelve more years,” said Trump, as the crowd cheered. “Then they say “he is a fascist! He is a fascist!'”


As they had been cued, the crowd began chanting “Twelve more years! Twelve more years!” just as loud as before as Trump grinned.


“What a group, only in Michigan, only in Michigan!” said Trump.
https://www.mediaite.com/donald-tru...higan-rally-crowd-to-chant-twelve-more-years/

Totally normal political rally folks.

"it can never happen here"
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
TOTALLY NORMAL POLITICAL RALLY FOLKS!

This is what the Republican Party has morphed into, supporting a sitting President who is now openly calling for all of his political opponents to be locked up.

What's shocking is the insidious way such views become 'normalised' inside this party of spineless sycophants.
 

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,647
Location
Australia
Nothing to see here. All is well.
getting a crowd to chant for another 3 terms and to lock up all political rivals, just, you know, completely normal liberal-democratic campaigning.

Are we taking bets yet on how quickly after counting starts on election night TV coverage that Trump calls the election illegitimate and will refuse to recognise the results?
 

Rob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
3,223
Supports
Liverpool
TOTALLY NORMAL POLITICAL RALLY FOLKS!

He’s gonna start a civil war if he loses.

Although I’m getting more and more convinced that he and his postmaster general will find a way to make enough of the mail in votes disappear to make sure he gets a second term.
 

Carolina Red

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Nov 7, 2015
Messages
36,379
Location
South Carolina
getting a crowd to chant for another 3 terms and to lock up all political rivals, just, you know, completely normal liberal-democratic campaigning.

Are we taking bets yet on how quickly after counting starts on election night TV coverage that Trump calls the election illegitimate and will refuse to recognise the results?
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,212
Location
Hell on Earth
I work with several Filipinos of similar age to me, mostly male. All of them worship Trump as they see similarities to Duterte in him.
They love their dictators/strongmen -- Marcos, Estrada to Duterte. They like the concept of 'democracy.' But the ensuing chaos that comes with democracy is seen as weak leadership -- which in turn will lead them back to 'strongmen' or men who play that role, actor or generals.
 

hmchan

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2017
Messages
1,429
Location
Hong Kong
In Hong Kong Trump is described as a very failed president by the Chinese propaganda. Is he really that terrible? Is there any successful policy that helps the Americans?
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,848
In Hong Kong Trump is described as a very failed president by the Chinese propaganda. Is he really that terrible? Is there any successful policy that helps the Americans?
He's been a failure by most measures, regardless of political leaning. Very few of his big policy plans were ever enacted, and he did very little to make a difference to the wider population.

His biggest successes from the Republican perspective have just required him to exist: adding 3 Supreme Court justices and hundreds of lower court judges. That is a huge change but one he had almost no influence on, post-election. For his supporters, he didn't build the wall, he didn't destroy Obamacare, he didn't bring jobs back to the rust belt. He did bring in the tax cuts, although I think his supporters found out not long after that it didn't help them as much as they'd expected, it didn't radically change the tax code, and it definitely helped his wealthy donors and a lot of "the swamp". His biggest active success was in rolling back regulations, particularly in climate policy with the Paris agreement being the big one.

From a wider national perspective, one of the few things he had bipartisan support on was infrastructure, and somehow he couldn't find the time to do it. He chipped away at the institutional norms, which few people appreciated and most people hated. Likewise with his approach to race relations. He was pretty irrelevant in international affairs, only really succeeding in making the US seem less important and more incompetent, and pissing off most of the population and experts on both sides with brainless trade policy. The economy did well but few would attribute that success to him either.

At the end of the day, the majority of the population didn't want most of his policies, and he wasn't able to enact most of them. The ones he did enact help very few people, and his general presence has only hurt America's international standing and taken the gloss of the presidency domestically. Some people would have accepted that if he was able to stimulate dying parts of the US economy, like the coal mines, but it was never really a possibility. One of the defining features of his presidency is how few people he appealed to.

To a larger degree than most of his predecessors, his words were more important than his actions in large part because he was relatively inactive. He honestly spent so much time playing golf and watching TV that he spent far less time on normal presidential things, and because he's not an actual politician, he found it incredibly difficult to get other people to do things he wanted them to do. The only thing he was really good at getting other people to do was to fire staff for him, and that relentless change only made him even more impotent.
 

MTF

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,243
Location
New York City
He's been a failure by most measures, regardless of political leaning. Very few of his big policy plans were ever enacted, and he did very little to make a difference to the wider population.

His biggest successes from the Republican perspective have just required him to exist: adding 3 Supreme Court justices and hundreds of lower court judges. That is a huge change but one he had almost no influence on, post-election. For his supporters, he didn't build the wall, he didn't destroy Obamacare, he didn't bring jobs back to the rust belt. He did bring in the tax cuts, although I think his supporters found out not long after that it didn't help them as much as they'd expected, it didn't radically change the tax code, and it definitely helped his wealthy donors and a lot of "the swamp". His biggest active success was in rolling back regulations, particularly in climate policy with the Paris agreement being the big one.

From a wider national perspective, one of the few things he had bipartisan support on was infrastructure, and somehow he couldn't find the time to do it. He chipped away at the institutional norms, which few people appreciated and most people hated. Likewise with his approach to race relations. He was pretty irrelevant in international affairs, only really succeeding in making the US seem less important and more incompetent, and pissing off most of the population and experts on both sides with brainless trade policy. The economy did well but few would attribute that success to him either.

At the end of the day, the majority of the population didn't want most of his policies, and he wasn't able to enact most of them. The ones he did enact help very few people, and his general presence has only hurt America's international standing and taken the gloss of the presidency domestically. Some people would have accepted that if he was able to stimulate dying parts of the US economy, like the coal mines, but it was never really a possibility. One of the defining features of his presidency is how few people he appealed to.

To a larger degree than most of his predecessors, his words were more important than his actions in large part because he was relatively inactive. He honestly spent so much time playing golf and watching TV that he spent far less time on normal presidential things, and because he's not an actual politician, he found it incredibly difficult to get other people to do things he wanted them to do. The only thing he was really good at getting other people to do was to fire staff for him, and that relentless change only made him even more impotent.
Great summary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.