LDUred
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
- Messages
- 2,765
It's got to be players who you can't remember when they last scored finally scoring and then nodding their head as if to say, 'I told you so'.
Especially when it's right at the edge of the box and there's no/little dangerKeepers giving away penalties by diving at the feet of attackers who just knock the ball past them. Idiots.
You are completely right. But it’s also the readers, who buy into this bs. It’s the same with transfer fees. If a club doesn’t make a new record signing every five to ten years, something is wrong with that club.I find it annoying when it is reported that some super star player's club is offering to make him the best paid player in their history. Wages are always going up, money in football is always increasing, "in their history" is a pointless thing to add. Now being reported with Isak at Newcastle. Why not just write "Newcastle offer Isak 300K a week to try to prevent him from moving to a bigger club" or something more resembling reality?
There's 2 Solskjaer ones that still annoy me. One against Arsenal (Lehmann save) and one his testimony late on at 0-0I hate when keepers get a fingertip on a shot that would otherwise have been a 10/10 worldie.
Nope, regularly hear it from away fans visiting Old Trafford. Normally those outside of the top 6 and NewcastleIt seems to be purely a lower league thing. There's certain chants that smaller teams seem to do en masse.
"Der der der, Football in a library" is another one.
The blatant cheating, is by far, the worst thing about the game for me. The likes of Garnacho collapsing like a dying swan when the edge of a defender's shadow has crept near one of his pristinely groomed eyebrows.
Half of the modern players fall down if you just walk past the TV during the bloody game!
I think the most demanding job of any parent must have been the mother of Rasmus Hojlund. Imagine having to get those grass stains out of his kit all the time, after every match, practice, kickabout...On that very subject :-
When a player goes down from a very slight contact, and is on the floor in a fetal position and...........flicking his wrist/hand around. No one did this until a year or two ago, now the likes of Saka and a bunch of others do it. Was there a memo? Did the human body evolve within two years to adapt a new way of reacting to pain (or none at all).
More than the collapse itself is the amount of time taken on the floor for absolutely everything. I wouldn't care as much if the dive resulted in a foul, and then the player getting up, but he almost always has to take a minute out of the game from a clip of a toe. It's not even as if there's pain, it's just blatant cheating. No one's hurt from that, not even for a second, let alone for a minute.
I don't think it's unreasonable tbh but I actually can't stand that football hasn't progressed to using a stop clock when the ball is dead or out of play (subs, free kicks, corners, goal kicks etc).
Surely it has to, at some point. The lack of one has been completely abused. Even if it means adjusting the length of a half to 40minutes or something. The milking of stoppages makes football tough to watch.
And I'll never, ever like the behind-the-player angle for penalities and shootouts. At no other stage of a match is this considered the best angle, most people agree sideways on is the best angle with which to view football, but that goes out the window at the most dramatic time. What annoys me even more is you don't get the replays in the 'normal' angle either. I feel I'd get a better sense of the penalty from the 'normal' angle, but the replays are often from behind the goal or from behind the player again, just to the sideI get unreasonably annoyed
![]()
80 minutes? The players would be fecked.
The average amount of active minutes per game, right now, is about 55 minutes. 80 active minutes would have players running for 25 more minutes than they do right now. Everyone would be injured.
Based on these statistics, looks like 60 minute games would be the best solution.
![]()
To expand on this when a player commits an obvious foul but looks the opposite way just as he’s doing it. Only for the ex footballer commentator who knows better to say he didn’t do it deliberately because he was looking the other way. Especially on deliberate hand balls. It’s mental.The blatant cheating, is by far, the worst thing about the game for me. The likes of Garnacho collapsing like a dying swan when the edge of a defender's shadow has crept near one of his pristinely groomed eyebrows.
Half of the modern players fall down if you just walk past the TV during the bloody game!
80 minutes? The players would be fecked.
The average amount of active minutes per game, right now, is about 55 minutes. 80 active minutes would have players running for 25 more minutes than they do right now. Everyone would be injured.
Based on these statistics, looks like 60 minute games would be the best solution.
![]()
Surely it has to, at some point. The lack of one has been completely abused. Even if it means adjusting the length of a half to 40minutes or something. The milking of stoppages makes football tough to watch.
It's by far the most annoying part of the game for me. We've taken a tip toe in the right direction with the 8 second count for a keeper to release the ball or the opposition receive a corner but that has to be the tip of the iceberg surely.
A stop clock would be so much more beneficial even if they made matches 35 mins a half instead, we'd still see so much more football and less theatrics.
Agree. I'd have it for all free-kicks as well.Totally disagree with those above about the penalty cam. Gives a far better view of them, how close to being saved etc
Keepers just drop to the floor to delay the start of the 8 second count. Pickford is famous for thisI agree, I just hope there's no leniency, and it is a hard 8 seconds across the board. These sorts of rules just seem to be so haphazardly enforced. Like a few years ago, when they said players going off as a sub have to leave by the nearest touchline, yet the amount of times referees force players to do that seems to be much less than half of the time. It seems to be enforced when it's a team that isn't trying to waste time, which is the opposite of what the rule is supposed to do.
Keepers giving away penalties by diving at the feet of attackers who just knock the ball past them. Idiots.
As a keeper, you have to guesstimate what the attacker is going to do, sometimes you make the wrong decision.Yeah one keeper somewhere in the world must have half a brain cell to attempt a faint/dummy dive in that scenario.