Toby Alderweireld

Status
Not open for further replies.

onemanarmy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
4,687
Location
Belgium
Not to be pedantic, but if Alderweireld is not only rusty but also unfit at the WC, surely Martinez can easily leave him on the bench and start with Vertonghen and Kompany at the back?
Belgium always plays 3 in the back. Aderweireld - Kompany - Vertonghen, with Vermaelen as a backup. Alderweireld is key to the system.

because i think we should sign someone who is 25/26 instead of him. if thats the standard you think is fine then thats up to you, but at Manchester United i would be expecting better to improve the squad, also the fact hes been out for a 3/4 months with a hamstring injury aint good either, we have enough players who get injured quite alot especially CB's.
It's his first big injury in his career. And he would easily be our best defender, miles ahead of the likes of Bailly and Lindelof. At 29 he could give us at least 3 more years.
 

Murray3007

Full Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
1,746
Belgium always plays 3 in the back. Aderweireld - Kompany - Vertonghen, with Vermaelen as a backup. Alderweireld is key to the system.



It's his first big injury in his career. And he would easily be our best defender, miles ahead of the likes of Bailly and Lindelof. At 29 he could give us at least 3 more years.
Dont really matter if its the 1st big injury, its a hamstring injury which alot of time when it does goes it goes quite often and the older you get the harder it takes to keep getting back. no sure hes miles ahead of Bailley would complement each other well but having seen his performances in a lot of the big games for spurs not sure he would be as good a signing as people make out on here.
 

onemanarmy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
4,687
Location
Belgium
Dont really matter if its the 1st big injury, its a hamstring injury which alot of time when it does goes it goes quite often and the older you get the harder it takes to keep getting back. no sure hes miles ahead of Bailley would complement each other well but having seen his performances in a lot of the big games for spurs not sure he would be as good a signing as people make out on here.
No it doesn't. Alderweireld was injured for 2 more games this season than Bailly, that's it. And he's not "older", he's 29!!! Defenders used to be considered at their peak at 30-33, until FM came along.

Anyways, I'll stop this discussion, you clearly don't rate him as much as I do, fair enough.
 

Murray3007

Full Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
1,746
No it doesn't. Alderweireld was injured for 2 more games this season than Bailly, that's it. And he's not "older", he's 29!!! Defenders used to be considered at their peak at 30-33, until FM came along.

Anyways, I'll stop this discussion, you clearly don't rate him as much as I do, fair enough.
so what if he was injured for just 2 more games then Bailly, so what if hes 29, yes 15 years ago defenders prob did peak at around 30-33 but the games has got a lot faster now, look at the difference in just one season between Cahill at Chelsea for example.
 

onemanarmy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
4,687
Location
Belgium
so what if he was injured for just 2 more games then Bailly, so what if hes 29, yes 15 years ago defenders prob did peak at around 30-33 but the games has got a lot faster now, look at the difference in just one season between Cahill at Chelsea for example.
Look, I don't want to go any further in this but look at Ramos (32), Chiellini (33), Godin (32), Piqué (31), Dani Alvas (35)... All perfect examples of defenders not good enough anymore because of the high pace of modern football? Marcelo, Hummels, Boateng... are all the same age as Alderweireld.
 

Murray3007

Full Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
1,746
Look, I don't want to go any further in this but look at Ramos (32), Chiellini (33), Godin (32), Piqué (31), Dani Alvas (35)... All perfect examples of defenders not good enough anymore because of the high pace of modern football? Marcelo, Hummels, Boateng... are all the same age as Alderweireld.
Yeah coz all them play in the premiership every week eh
 

A-man

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
6,314
Best defender in the league and potentially even Europe (yes, he’s that good) is available for around £40m - surely this will be a priority.
If he is the best defender in Europe, you can assure he is not going for 40. Personally I dont think he is that good. If he was better than all defenders in Real, Barca, City, Bayern, etc, they would all be fighting over him.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
Like him a lot but have we been that poor at CB? Can't remember too many games the defence cost us games at CB especially as we've rarely played the same two there. I know he's not had a long history of injuries but it feels a little ironic to be potentially signing another CB who's just come back from being injured. Our bigger problem is going the other way......
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,545
Location
Somewhere out there
Like him a lot but have we been that poor at CB? Can't remember too many games the defence cost us games at CB especially as we've rarely played the same two there. I know he's not had a long history of injuries but it feels a little ironic to be potentially signing another CB who's just come back from being injured. Our bigger problem is going the other way......
Transitions start from the back, and we’re pretty terrible at it imo. We also need or CB’s (at least one) to be much more comfortable joining in midfield when up against packed defences.
Having a player as good as Toby on the ball would be a big plus, as would ever getting Bailly healthy for a period of time.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Like him a lot but have we been that poor at CB? Can't remember too many games the defence cost us games at CB especially as we've rarely played the same two there. I know he's not had a long history of injuries but it feels a little ironic to be potentially signing another CB who's just come back from being injured. Our bigger problem is going the other way......
We need to be better coming out with the ball from deeper areas. It affects us higher up the pitch.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
Transitions start from the back, and we’re pretty terrible at it imo. We also need or CB’s (at least one) to be much more comfortable joining in midfield when up against packed defences.
Having a player as good as Toby on the ball would be a big plus, as would ever getting Bailly healthy for a period of time.
Agree but that's not been a problem as such given the way we set up. Our midfielders play deep under Jose and I don't believe that's cause we don't have ball playing CB's. To do this would be a risk Jose wouldn't want to take. The problem with the transition is in midfield. We take too many touches and don't move the ball quick enough. Also the full backs who don't play high enough despite often having the insurance of two deep midfielders.....

Toby's a great addition but he'll look very different in our system.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Agree but that's not been a problem as such given the way we set up. Our midfielders play deep under Jose and I don't believe that's cause we don't have ball playing CB's. To do this would be a risk Jose wouldn't want to take. The problem with the transition is in midfield. We take too many touches and don't move the ball quick enough. Also the full backs who don't play high enough despite often having the insurance of two deep midfielders.....

Toby's a great addition but he'll look very different in our system.
If our defenders can play passes through lines and step into midfield, our midfielders don't need to be as deep, that's the point.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
If our defenders can play passes through lines and step into midfield, our midfielders don't need to be as deep, that's the point.
Our midfielders are deep cause that's how Jose sets them up. Ive seen nothing to suggest that Jose will want to change that as defensively we have been very good. The midfield continues to be the problem as we don't have a Carrick who does pass through the lines. Our play is also very narrow as the fullbacks rarely go beyond whoever is playing wide, and our attackers always look to come inside....
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Our midfielders are deep cause that's how Jose sets them up. Ive seen nothing to suggest that Jose will want to change that as defensively we have been very good. The midfield continues to be the problem as we don't have a Carrick who does pass through the lines.....
We need to be stronger in the build up and transitions. Jose has spoken about being aggressive between the lines before. Part of the reason why our lines are the way they are is because of the defence has deficiencies. Either way, playing through a press requires the defenders to be better on the ball. It's a problem away from home.

Our play is also very narrow as the fullbacks rarely go beyond whoever is playing wide, and our attackers always look to come inside....
They do go beyond. The problem is Young needs to cut in to cross it so it affects the width. Valencia is one footed and not good enough linking play from deeper areas. That and he has declined anyway and his crossing isn't great. We need our defenders to be better on the ball, that's both the fullbacks and CB's. If we can get width, crosses, evade the press, the defenders will enhance our attack considerably.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,545
Location
Somewhere out there
Our midfielders are deep cause that's how Jose sets them up. Ive seen nothing to suggest that Jose will want to change that as defensively we have been very good. The midfield continues to be the problem as we don't have a Carrick who does pass through the lines. Our play is also very narrow as the fullbacks rarely go beyond whoever is playing wide, and our attackers always look to come inside....
The fullbacks go beyond all the time in fairness. Part of the reason we lack width is our right midfielder is a hybrid 10 and our left back is a right footed winger.

And I disagree about Jose, he’s the manager that loved Carvalho after all and he was a top player that facilitated fast transitions and loved stepping into midfield.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
We need to be stronger in the build up and transitions. Jose has spoken about being aggressive between the lines before. Part of the reason why our lines are the way they are is because of the defence has deficiencies. Either way, playing through a press requires the defenders to be better on the ball. It's a problem away from home.
Dont agree at all. We have one of the best defensive records in the prem and you could argue that's why we are second. We have one of the worst cohesive midfields out of the top 4 teams. Up front is the same and with 2 games left of the season, we still don't know who's our best 3 as a unit YET we are talking about the deficiencies in defence? We haven't lost games because of not dealing with the press or playing through the lines from the back, we lost games because we lack imagination in the last third and don't have that outstanding player that does. Not a top team in the world who doesn't have that special player, but currently we do not.....
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Dont agree at all. We have one of the best defensive records in the prem and you could argue that's why we are second. We have one of the worst cohesive midfields out of the top 4 teams. Up front is the same and with 2 games left of the season, we still don't know who's our best 3 as a unit YET we are talking about the deficiencies in defence? We haven't lost games because of not dealing with the press or playing through the lines from the back, we lost games because we lack imagination in the last third and don't have that outstanding player that does. Not a top team in the world who doesn't have that special player, but currently we do not.....
Feel like I am talking to a wall...

Look at the top teams around Europe. Does their defence not contribute to their build up and to start attacks? This includes both their fullbacks and CB's. We cannot deal with a press at times because of our play from deeper areas... the defence is the deepest line... they are not great on the ball so we struggle as a team...

Does the passes and play on the ball not affect our midfield? If they have to drop deeper does the link to the attack not become more problematic? If the defender can play a pass through lines into midfielders who are higher up the pitch, are we not now more dangerous? If our defenders can step into midfield, does this not take opposition players out the game? Does it not offer another pass? Does this not all affect build up and our attacking play?

Can you expect to build play by hoofing it all the time? Yes at times we can use the long ball, but you need to mix it up. Our defence is not good enough. Us playing more defensively at times also helps them out. Lets not pretend Valencia and Young are not our fullbacks.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
The fullbacks go beyond all the time in fairness. Part of the reason we lack width is our right midfielder is a hybrid 10 and our left back is a right footed winger.

And I disagree about Jose, he’s the manager that loved Carvalho after all and he was a top player that facilitated fast transitions and loved stepping into midfield.
Don't think they do in general play but only when we are chasing the game. Most of the games I've watched, the passing is in front of the opponents and we rarely get behind them. We generally really struggle to break teams down in the last third.
I agree about Carvalho but I think it was more about the player than the system. We also seen the disaster of Luiz at times too.

Like I said, I rate Toby but I struggle when there's talk of buying players that look good in a system I know we don't play especially when it's from teams that are attack minded.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Don't think they do in general play but only when we are chasing the game. Most of the games I've watched, the passing is in front of the opponents and we rarely get behind them. We generally really struggle to break teams down in the last third.
I agree about Carvalho but I think it was more about the player than the system. We also seen the disaster of Luiz at times too.

Like I said, I rate Toby but I struggle when there's talk of buying players that look good in a system I know we don't play especially when it's from teams that are attack minded.
How can you expect to play such a game with defenders who are not good enough on the ball? You are setting them up to fail. The idea is that you buy players who are better on the ball so you can build play better.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
Feel like I am talking to a wall...

Look at the top teams around Europe. Does their defence not contribute to their build up and to start attacks? This includes both their fullbacks and CB's. We cannot deal with a press at times because of our play from deeper areas... the defence is the deepest line... they are not great on the ball so we struggle as a team...

Does the passes and play on the ball not affect our midfield? If they have to drop deeper does the link to the attack not become more problematic? If the defender can play a pass through lines into midfielders who are higher up the pitch, are we not now more dangerous? If our defenders can step into midfield, does this not take opposition players out the game? Does it not offer another pass? Does this not all affect build up and our attacking play?

Can you expect to build play by hoofing it all the time? Yes at times we can use the long ball, but you need to mix it up. Our defence is not good enough. Us playing more defensively at times also helps them out. Lets not pretend Valencia and Young are not our fullbacks.
Leave the arrogance elsewhere as I'm sure you didn't invent football or are not the barometer of how to play it. All you are stating is an opinion of which I don't agree with. Too broad brush to compare the long list of anomalies when taking about 'top teams'.
I understand the arguments you make but my point remains the same which is based on fact. We have one of the best defensive records in the league. We can all give our armchair opinion of how we should/could play but it counts for nothing in how Jose has set his teams up whether we like it or not. It's just my opinion and nothing else but generally I can't remember too many defensive errors this season, but I can remember and number of games that we got to the edge of the opponents box, and ran out of ideas. Getting there was never a problem......
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Leave the arrogance elsewhere as I'm sure you didn't invent football or are not the barometer of how to play it. All you are stating is an opinion of which I don't agree with. Too broad brush to compare the long list of anomalies when taking about 'top teams'.
I understand the arguments you make but my point remains the same which is based on fact. We have one of the best defensive records in the league. We can all give our armchair opinion of how we should/could play but it counts for nothing in how Jose has set his teams up whether we like it or not. It's just my opinion and nothing else but generally I can't remember too many defensive errors this season, but I can remember and number of games that we got to the edge of the opponents box, and ran out of ideas. Getting there was never a problem......
The point is Jose cannot really change how our defence approaches build up because they do not have the quality... buying players who are better on the ball means we can change our approach. If we ask the defence to be more aggresive with their passing or play higher up they’d get exposed. The fact that they may sit deeper and not contribute enough to the build up does hinder our attacking play though.

If Jose asks our defenders to start stepping into midfield and play passes through lines you would see more mistakes. If they were successful with such things though it would help our attack. If we keep the defence the same we cannot evolve our attacking play.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
How can you expect to play such a game with defenders who are not good enough on the ball? You are setting them up to fail. The idea is that you buy players who are better on the ball so you can build play better.
Ever thought that Jose doesn't want them to build the play up?
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Ever thought that Jose doesn't want them to build the play up?
Why would he not want them to do that? That post makes no sense. The ball will always be in deep areas throughout the game. Despite what people think, he did not just spend his career telling his defenders to hoof it up the pitch at every opportunity.

There is nothing wrong with the long ball when it is on. Top teams still need to be able to build play though. He has managed top teams and is a top manager. The suggestion that he does not want his defenders involved in build up is just ludicrous and makes no sense. They have to be involved in buildup one way or another.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
The point is Jose cannot really change how our defence approaches build up because they do not have the quality... buying players who are better on the ball means we can change our approach. If we ask the defence to be more aggresive with their passing or play higher up they’d get exposed. The fact that they may sit deeper and not contribute enough to the build up does hinder our attacking play though.

If Jose asks our defenders to start stepping into midfield and play passes through lines you would see more mistakes. If they were successful with such things though it would help our attack. If we keep the defence the same we cannot evolve our attacking play.
You are missing one big point. This is what you think it needs but everything else would suggest differently. I'm not suggesting the defense can't be upgraded, I'm just saying I can't see him playing differently on how he's sets his teams up. That's not just my view, isn't that why fans, ex players and tv pundits don't generally like him cause he's defensive minded?
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
Why would he not want them to do that? That post makes no sense. The ball will always be in deep areas throughout the game. Despite what people think, he did not just spend his career telling his defenders to hoof it up the pitch at every opportunity.

There is nothing wrong with the long ball when it is on. Top teams still need to be able to build play though. He has managed top teams and is a top manager. The suggestion that he does not want his defenders involved in build up is just ludicrous and makes no sense. They have to be involved in buildup one way or another.
Jose is a defensively minded coach who wins games through not conceding. The Utd defenders are involved in the build up play as DDG doesn't just hoof the goal kicks, they are just not to the extent as you are suggesting. Jose likes to keep his defensive shape and thinks this gives thoughs in front of them the license to play. I'd argue we lack in imagination or creativity in areas. I think we also isolate Rom at times.....
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
You are missing one big point. This is what you think it needs but everything else would suggest differently. I'm not suggesting the defense can't be upgraded, I'm just saying I can't see him playing differently on how he's sets his teams up. That's not just my view, isn't that why fans, ex players and tv pundits don't generally like him cause he's defensive minded?
You think if he was given Real Madrid’s defence our transitions and play into midfield would be the same? Their is a gulf of quality of our defenders on the ball. This is including the fullbacks. There would be another level of aggressiveness and license to play through lines if we had Real’s defenders.

Jose is a defensively minded coach who wins games through not conceding. The Utd defenders are involved in the build up play as DDG doesn't just hoof the goal kicks, they are just not to the extent as you are suggesting. Jose likes to keep his defensive shape and thinks this gives thoughs in front of them the license to play. I'd argue we lack in imagination or creativity in areas. I think we also isolate Rom at times.....
Jose is a coach that understands the base of the team is a defence. The ball starts with the defence, the defence protects the goal. If your defence is exposed you cannot win titles consistently. He is not naive enough to think the defenders do not need to be involved in the build up at all.
 
Last edited:

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
You think if he was given Real Madrid’s defence our transitions and play into midfield would be the same? Their is a gulf of quality of our defenders on the ball. This is including the fullbacks. There would be another level of aggressiveness and license to play through lines if we had Real’s defenders.
Real have been defensively poor though? Most would argue that they have been very lucky to get to the final and didn't they come second in their group? Think you'll find he had his critics there too. That said, any team that has that offensive talent, hides many of there defensive shortcomings. I think City and Liverpool have been successful in that way as you wouldn't describe either defence as world class, yet one has broken all kinds of records and the other is in CL final....
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,183
You think if he was given Real Madrid’s defence our transitions and play into midfield would be the same? Their is a gulf of quality of our defenders on the ball. This is including the fullbacks. There would be another level of aggressiveness and license to play through lines if we had Real’s defenders.

Jose is a coach that understands the base of the team is a defence. The ball starts with the defence, the defence protects the goal. If your defence is exposed you cannot win titles consistently. He is not naive enough to think the defenders do not need to be involved in the build up at all.
Didn't say they weren't, just not in the way you described. The way you described the buildup play is so not Jose. That's not to say it's not important but maybe more so if we were playing 3 at the back....
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Real have been defensively poor though? Most would argue that they have been very lucky to get to the final and didn't they come second in their group? Think you'll find he had his critics there too. That said, any team that has that offensive talent, hides many of there defensive shortcomings. I think City and Liverpool have been successful in that way as you wouldn't describe either defence as world class, yet one has broken all kinds of records and the other is in CL final....
Liverpool for example attempt to win the ball higher up the pitch which reduces the amount the defence has to build play. We cannot sit here and pretend that they were not struggling to break down teams who sat deep against them. This was a common criticism of the Liverpool team, especially last season.

This was partly due to quality of build up play. Klopp wanted Van Dijk for a reason, and paid the £75 million for him for a reason. Lets also remember that such tactics to press with their 3 man midfield meant that once you got in behind the midfield, their defence was exposed and leaked goals. This is a consequence of them trying to win the ball higher up to skip a stage of buildup.

Pep spent 200 million on his defence for a reason. They needed players better on the ball. He tried Kolarov at LCB last season but ultimately he wasn’t good enough. Ederson is good on the ball as well. I am not claiming Jose will be as extreme as Pep in terms of build up, he will still place value on it though.
 

Morpheus 7

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2014
Messages
3,686
Location
Ireland
Ever thought that Jose doesn't want them to build the play up?
I remember Jose saying in the past that you defend from the front. That works the other way, you can attack from the back. The ball distribution from some of our players is atrocious at the back. Smalling is a huge culprit, he seems to pass it to De Gea more than Matic and Pogba, in some case's just hits it out of play. It's possible that some of this is down tactics and midfielders/full back's no making themselves available. In my opinion it's lacking quality to drive the team forward. You can't underestimate the importance of transition from defense to attack. This starts with our CB's, it doesn't mean they constantly need to have the ball. It does means when they do, they must help that transition with good forward passing with tempo, keeping the play positive. Toby would be a fantastic addition if he was available. His injuries are a concern but he has leadership qualities we are sorely missing. I mean with wanting the ball and adding bravery and bite to our game. Instead of poor nervous play with the defender's passing on the responsibility instead of taking it.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,554
Learned something new, that our non-existence and disjointed midfield and attack were steamed from CBs that can't ping forward passes. The thought is if we have van Dijk at the back, we will turn into Liverpool, playing attacking football; with forwards scoring for fun.
 

haram

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
12,921
Learned something new, that our non-existence and disjointed midfield and attack were steamed from CBs that can't ping forward passes. The thought is if we have van Dijk at the back, we will turn into Liverpool, playing attacking football; with forwards scoring for fun.
No, because we have seen against Man United and Chelsea recently that Liverpool can still struggle. If you look at the top European teams though you will see build up from defenders. Liverpool’s attacking play is moreso built off their pressing anyway. That’s a style that has been trained by them for almost 3 years now. It’s not something we can just turn on for example.
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
Ever thought that Jose doesn't want them to build the play up?
Jose is not happy with how our centre back couldn't play out from the back and are very slow in the transition from defence to attack so he brought Lindelof for reason. First time in while I have seen defender playing out from the balls and attack space in midfield to pass was Arsenal games at home when Lindelof started and he was key in the transitioning from defence to attack and it is way quicker than Smalling and Jones partnership, most of the time I see when Lindelof started, Matic and Pogba don't need to go deep to collect balls where it would open big gaps between attacking and midfield. We need a defender who can play out from the back comfortably and under pressure. This is the way we can improve our attacking display if CB plays out from the back and attack midfield so midfielder can connect the attacking and midfield quicker rather than going deep to collect balls from back where it could open big gaps in space between midfielders and forwarder.
 

Gordon S

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,524
Didn't say they weren't, just not in the way you described. The way you described the buildup play is so not Jose. That's not to say it's not important but maybe more so if we were playing 3 at the back....
Yep, All our defenders bar Smalling are pretty decent with the ball, but the midfielders are still constantly there picking up the ball 5m from the defender. And a lot of times they are not even doing very much with it, just pass it back to another defender. Would Toby change how Mourinho wants his midfielders to play?
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
11,888
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Learned something new, that our non-existence and disjointed midfield and attack were steamed from CBs that can't ping forward passes. The thought is if we have van Dijk at the back, we will turn into Liverpool, playing attacking football; with forwards scoring for fun.
I know this is being sarcastic, but it is actually a point to show how good Rojo was for us. He had an eye for a pass to break the lines and was good at it. We tended to play better football with him in the side.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,440
Location
Dublin, Ireland
People put too much thought into centrebacks who can play out from the back. Fergies teams didn’t always have it but could transition quickly due to having pace and movement in wide areas, with wingers and fullbacks who could support comfortably. The likes ok keane, Carrick and scholes regularly picked the ball up deep
 

ROFLUTION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
7,546
Location
Denmark
People put too much thought into centrebacks who can play out from the back. Fergies teams didn’t always have it but could transition quickly due to having pace and movement in wide areas, with wingers and fullbacks who could support comfortably. The likes ok keane, Carrick and scholes regularly picked the ball up deep
I think it's not only that they can play out from the back but more that they can play out of pressure. A lot of teams are now doing a lot of pressure high up the field (City, Spurs, Liverpool)

We saw it earlier in the season when Spurs pressed us high up and Jones/Smalling were very much on the wrong foot.
 

Rajma

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
8,571
Location
Lithuania
Would love him here, his quality is there for all to see. Besides him being good on the ball he's not to shabby defensively either and is proven quantity. Head and shoulders above our current crop anyway.
 

Decomposing In Paris

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
1,318
Location
Belfast
People put too much thought into centrebacks who can play out from the back. Fergies teams didn’t always have it but could transition quickly due to having pace and movement in wide areas, with wingers and fullbacks who could support comfortably. The likes ok keane, Carrick and scholes regularly picked the ball up deep
CB's like Ferdinand, Johnsen, Blanc, and even Pallister were all capable of playing out from the back, or steping up into midfield. It was actually a quality that Ferguson valued.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.