Exactly this. The numbers being thrown out for the likes of Tonali.... We should be getting a young star for anything over 60-65M.
Have to disagree with this. He would be a great squad player. One of the few Spurs plus points this season.
What do you consider to be on the cheap?
Very harsh to call him a meh player
Standard decent prem player in a small club, 6/10.
Pretty much. I’d say more 7/10, but yes, he’s exactly the sort there’d be clamour to sign on the back of a good season and then have our fans moan when he underwhelms.
Often, but not always. Hakimi, Odegaard, Navas, Llorente, Theo Hernandez, Kovacic have all been moved on in the last decade and gone on to generally do very well for new teams. Going further back, you've got Makelele, Robben, Ozil, Di Maria etc who all became world class after Madrid binned them off.
I agree - amazed at the noise around him. I was actually against selling him at the time and thought he'd eventually become a decent squad option in time but confused as to why we'd bring him back now.
So don't want experienced backup to Sesko then?
Not someone in their early 30's, no.
Doesn't that wording experienced striker in article tell you they clearly see Sesko as the main one. I can tell you think that's the wrong decision which is understandable, so who would you like to sign to lead line then?
Agree hes been playing in defence most of the time due to injuries...hes actually really oress resistant and good on ball in cm, just hasnt had the oppprtunities to play there...wouldnt sign him as dont think what we need and prefer Bergvall at Spurs....but post you redponding too also totally disagree with the opinion
Agree looked very promising as a youth here and developed into a good player now at Everton....no disrespect to them, but thats level...doesnt start for top 6 side
IF we signed one of those composed players and they are out there would you still feel the same about Camavinga
Nothing weird about it, Rice is objectively a much better midfielder than Garner. Garner is having a good season, but let's be real, he's 25 and this is his first very good season.Because he's better than the midfielders we've been linked with
This is a really weird one
He has 6 assists and 2 goals for Everton, Rice has 4 assists and 5 goals for the team at the top of the table and he was £100 million and is their contender for player of the season
Garner wins the ball more, plays more forward passes and more progressive passes. He has 1 less combined goal and assist in the league this season despite vastly inferior players around him. Rice is more of a goal threat himself and Arsenal rely on his set pieces, even though he's set up less goals than Garner. Rice is better at dribbling, while Garner is better passing.
No offence but it just seems like you have no idea about the player
Im surprised that people actually think he’s good & physical enough to come to the level of United when the legs hanging out of birds nest have more meat on them
OK who are you putting in the poor targets category then if they work out can come back to this post again
I would agree with you on half of them
