As
@golden_blunder asked this be taken to this thread, and just on the final "shot volume" point, here are some relevant striker ranked in terms of shot volume per 90 for their current clubs:
Osimhen: 5.19
Ekitike: 3.96
Gyokeres: 3.72
Sesko: 2.60
Delap: 2.29
Mateta: 2.29
Zirkzee: 1.79
Hojlund: 1.52
The league they play in has an impact, but not by as much as you might think.
For example, Osimhen got fewer shots when he played in Italy and Hojlund & Zirkzee got more. But Osimhen was still averaging 4.16, where Hojlund and Zirkzee were on 2.65 & 2.86.
The ability to generate shots is a trait in itself. Players might lose/gain an extra shot per game transferring between leagues but the general tendency to shoot in volume stays.
Another point to add to this is that what
typically happens as strikers age is that they get fewer shots but the quality of the average shot they takes gets better. So with young players you'd prefer high shot volume, as it's more likely to decrease over time. And you care slightly less about shot quality, because that's more likely to improve. Which aligns with the way we generally tend to think of strikers making smarter decisions and becoming more efficient with age.
One of the potential issues with Hojlund that was flagged in advance of us signing him was that he was the opposite profile. A low-volume shooter who tended to get good quality chances. Which meant we were depending on him developing in an atypical way, getting
more shots as he aged. Which can happen, but it's less predictable.