Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pavl3n

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
1,899
Erm ... We all know that we've met with Camavinga's representatives. However I'm not willing to believe this report coming from ESPN. Mainly because all the players mentioned are the same mould of midfielders as Pogba. There were reports during the Camavinga tweet flurries, that Eduardo's pursuit is not connected to Pogba's departure. In other words if Pogba stays and signs extension we still would be pursuing one of those players.
So I wouldn't give too much credibility to that report.
I think you failed to acknowledge one possibility in these reports.
Ole most likely wants Pogba to stay meaning he likes what Pogba has to offer.
Pogba does not want to extend. So, Ole looks for another MF like Pogba.
Fundamentally, I don't see any harm in that especially if keeping Pogba would require record wages for the player. I just don't think he's worth it.
What I do not want to see is us giving Pogba a massive contract to extend and he continues to play LW and be inconsistent.
Even if he doesn't extend and he's not sold this summer, we're still going to see Pogba playing LW due to Rashford being out for several months.
As far as Ole's concerned, Pogba is first choice for that spot behind Rashford which is grim.
Sorry, I meant to say 'Mainly because all the players mentioned are NOT the same mould of midfielders as Pogba. They are pure DCMs.


I'm having the feeling that Ole would be happy to play Pogba in the middle since the arrival of Varane. I also think ideally Ole would like to bring in a #6 and play in a 4-3-3 (Stephen Howson reported that Mike Phelan confirmed as true, when asked if we are looking at a 4-3-3).
I also believe that Ole would rather keep Pogba and Pogba will play a lot more in the middle rather than LW. We all know the reason why Paul played at LW - he's not good at defending and having Lindelof in the back, who often gets outrun, outjumped, pushed around and unable to win the ball back, Ole prefers to have 2 players good at defending rather than just one.
With Varane in the back, Paul will get a lot more minutes in the middle and I'd put my head on the guillotine and say that he'll barely play at LW. The LW minutes will be shared mainly between Sancho, Martial, Rashford and maybe Dan James.
 

Pavl3n

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
1,899
They have all of the money and that's what the rumours are.

I'm not exactly convinced they will but they've no striker worth talking about at all.
Back when they brought Jesus I was thinking that he's the real deal. Not so much anymore.
260m is a lot of money, but if they manage to raise 100m in sales, then that leaves them with 160m net spend, which is totally acceptable.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Sorry, I meant to say 'Mainly because all the players mentioned are NOT the same mould of midfielders as Pogba. They are pure DCMs.


I'm having the feeling that Ole would be happy to play Pogba in the middle since the arrival of Varane. I also think ideally Ole would like to bring in a #6 and play in a 4-3-3 (Stephen Howson reported that Mike Phelan confirmed as true, when asked if we are looking at a 4-3-3).
I also believe that Ole would rather keep Pogba and Pogba will play a lot more in the middle rather than LW. We all know the reason why Paul played at LW - he's not good at defending and having Lindelof in the back, who often gets outrun, outjumped, pushed around and unable to win the ball back, Ole prefers to have 2 players good at defending rather than just one.
With Varane in the back, Paul will get a lot more minutes in the middle and I'd put my head on the guillotine and say that he'll barely play at LW. The LW minutes will be shared mainly between Sancho, Martial, Rashford and maybe Dan James.
None of the midfielders we are linked to can cover for Pogba and Bruno as #8's, it doesn't matter who the CB's are.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
Sorry, I meant to say 'Mainly because all the players mentioned are NOT the same mould of midfielders as Pogba. They are pure DCMs.


I'm having the feeling that Ole would be happy to play Pogba in the middle since the arrival of Varane. I also think ideally Ole would like to bring in a #6 and play in a 4-3-3 (Stephen Howson reported that Mike Phelan confirmed as true, when asked if we are looking at a 4-3-3).
I also believe that Ole would rather keep Pogba and Pogba will play a lot more in the middle rather than LW. We all know the reason why Paul played at LW - he's not good at defending and having Lindelof in the back, who often gets outrun, outjumped, pushed around and unable to win the ball back, Ole prefers to have 2 players good at defending rather than just one.
With Varane in the back, Paul will get a lot more minutes in the middle and I'd put my head on the guillotine and say that he'll barely play at LW. The LW minutes will be shared mainly between Sancho, Martial, Rashford and maybe Dan James.
None of those three is good enough/pure enough to be the lone DCM in a 4-3-3 in my opinion - Camavinga is too young , Neves to immobile and Saul is too much tilting towards an box to box.

Ofcourse you might either of those with Fred or McT together with Pogba, but if we are talking a pure DM then only Rice/Ndidi could do that.
 

Maluco

Last Man Standing 3 champion 2019/20
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
5,877
Brilliant deal/business for Villa. Anyone who wouldn’t take Buendia/Bailey/Ward-Prowse for one Jack Grealish is a mad man.
 

Pavl3n

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
1,899
None of the midfielders we are linked to can cover for Pogba and Bruno as #8's, it doesn't matter who the CB's are.
True. I don't think I said that they could cover for one of them. Fred and VDB are the covers for Paul and Bruno.
None of those three is good enough/pure enough to be the lone DCM in a 4-3-3 in my opinion - Camavinga is too young , Neves to immobile and Saul is too much tilting towards an box to box.

Ofcourse you might either of those with Fred or McT together with Pogba, but if we are talking a pure DM then only Rice/Ndidi could do that.
I can't argue with that as I haven't watched enough of them playing, but why would we want to switch to 4-3-3 and still want one of them instead of being linked with Rice/Ndidi? Which both would cost a fortune. I think Camavinga is the main target and the coaches believe that he could slot in that position with the right guidance.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
True. I don't think I said that they could cover for one of them. Fred and VDB are the covers for Paul and Bruno.
What I was saying was that none of Saul/Neves/Camavinga are capable of allowing both Pogba and Bruno to play, we'll get ran through.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
True. I don't think I said that they could cover for one of them. Fred and VDB are the covers for Paul and Bruno.

I can't argue with that as I haven't watched enough of them playing, but why would we want to switch to 4-3-3 and still want one of them instead of being linked with Rice/Ndidi? Which both would cost a fortune. I think Camavinga is the main target and the coaches believe that he could slot in that position with the right guidance.
Yeah, that can absolutely happen - but it will minimum take a couple of years to get him to be a top side DM in PL. It requires alot of positional intelligence and experience.

And they wont switch to 4-3-3 until they have an absolute top class DM.
 

FPL addict

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 20, 2021
Messages
95
Supports
Leeds Utd
Brilliant deal/business for Villa. Anyone who wouldn’t take Buendia/Bailey/Ward-Prowse for one Jack Grealish is a mad man.
Just saw Bailey has better stats in the Bundesliga than Sancho this season....wonder why Man Utd weren't interested ? Maybe already set on Sancho.
 

Maluco

Last Man Standing 3 champion 2019/20
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
5,877
Any mid-table club you mean
Bar about 4-5 clubs in world football! And even then, it could be a bad decision.

Bailey/Buendia could be in contention to play at any of the top clubs. They could well be sought after in a few years by even the likes of City.

Ward Prowse could well step up in a better team too. Even for the value alone, it’s a fantastic deal.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,205
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Bar about 4-5 clubs in world football! And even then, it could be a bad decision.

Bailey/Buendia could be in contention to play at any of the top clubs. They could well be sought after in a few years by even the likes of City.

Ward Prowse could well step up in a better team too. Even for the value alone, it’s a fantastic deal.
I dont think Bailey is anything special
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
I guess the coaching staff and scouts see something in them. Let's see.
Like Nick said, there's no holding midfielder that can make it work, the make-up up of the 3 man midfield requires at least one of the #8's to be a proper box to box, neither Pogba or Bruno are that.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,417
I'd actually rank him as a 100m player to be fair.

But I don't think City really needed to spend 100m on a position they aren't short in. So this transfer is a bit weird. He's an outstanding player and to anyone thinking hel rotate with others like Mahrez did - do you really think City will make a club record transfer of 100m just for a player to rotate?!

He's coming in as the D Silva to KDB I think. And when he's not that, hel be out on the left opposite to Foden.

The only positive is that they lack an explosive player outside of Sterling to really use pace and run on behind. They lack a top striker for the time being too.

Let's just hope they don't get Kane
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,759
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Bar about 4-5 clubs in world football! And even then, it could be a bad decision.

Bailey/Buendia could be in contention to play at any of the top clubs. They could well be sought after in a few years by even the likes of City.

Ward Prowse could well step up in a better team too. Even for the value alone, it’s a fantastic deal.
I'd take Grealish at United over all three.

It's not madness at all. Ward-prowse is not an elite player. Buendia could be a top player one day and I don't know enough about the other bloke but it's not a safe bet by any means.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,759
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
I'd actually rank him as a 100m player to be fair.

But I don't think City really needed to spend 100m on a position they aren't short in. So this transfer is a bit weird. He's an outstanding player and to anyone thinking hel rotate with others like Mahrez did - do you really think City will make a club record transfer of 100m just for a player to rotate?!

He's coming in as the D Silva to KDB I think. And when he's not that, hel be out on the left opposite to Foden.

The only positive is that they lack an explosive player outside of Sterling to really use pace and run on behind. They lack a top striker for the time being too.

Let's just hope they don't get Kane
Yeah I agree. He's coming in for the Silva role as they've never adequately replaced him. They're fairly stacked on the wings and I think he'll be rarely used out there.
 

Maluco

Last Man Standing 3 champion 2019/20
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
5,877
I'd take Grealish at United over all three.

It's not madness at all. Ward-prowse is not an elite player. Buendia could be a top player one day and I don't know enough about the other bloke but it's not a safe bet by any means.
If we hadn’t signed Sancho for the right hand side, I would have easily taken the three. Bailey brings real pace and a player who wants to play as a natural right winger.

Buendia could well match Grealish goal contributions even if you lose his ball carrying (which sometimes doesn’t really go anywhere). He can make the step up. I am pretty confident.

Ward Prowse gives you a good CM with world class set piece delivery on top. Not to mention the English tax to his value too!

Far more sensible to take the three in terms of squad strength, player potential and the value that it brings. It’s a no brainer for me, especially in Villa’s case. It absolutely would be madness for them, in their situation, not to take that trade off.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,759
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
If we hadn’t signed Sancho for the right hand side, I would have easily taken the three. Bailey brings real pace and a player who wants to play as a natural right winger.

Buendia could well match Grealish goal contributions even if you lose his ball carrying (which sometimes doesn’t really go anywhere). He can make the step up. I am pretty confident.

Ward Prowse gives you a good CM with world class set piece delivery on top. Not to mention the English tax to his value too!

Far more sensible to take the three in terms of squad strength, player potential and the value that it brings. It’s a no brainer for me, especially in Villa’s case. It absolutely would be madness for them, in their situation, not to take that trade off.
If you want to challenge for titles you don't have the luxury of bringing in two maybes and mid-table midfielder just because his set pieces are amazing when the alternative is one proven first teamer.
 

Maluco

Last Man Standing 3 champion 2019/20
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
5,877
If you want to challenge for titles you don't have the luxury of bringing in two maybes and mid-table midfielder just because his set pieces are amazing when the alternative is one proven first teamer.
All of them are proven first teamers. Their output has the potential to massively make up for the loss of Grealish. It’s a great deal for Villa and makes them a lot better.

Only about 5 teams/squads in the world that it doesn’t make better, so we will agree to disagree.

It’s a fantastic deal for Villa that they would be mad not to take, and that’s all that really matters in this context anyway.
 

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
Who else is spending 250m on 2 players after a year without crowd revenue? How much prize money do you think they get?
Think City got around 200 m from PL+CL , and probably some more from domestic cups. Might not be all the way there but at least quite close
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
29,759
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
All of them are proven first teamers. Their output has the potential to massively make up for the loss of Grealish. It’s a great deal for Villa and makes them a lot better.

Only about 5 teams/squads in the world that it doesn’t make better, so we will agree to disagree.

It’s a fantastic deal for Villa that they would be mad not to take, and that’s all that really matters in this context anyway.
No argument that it's a great deal for Villa. I just think you're over-blowing it.
 

GwilDor

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
1,891
Location
Norway
None of those three is good enough/pure enough to be the lone DCM in a 4-3-3 in my opinion - Camavinga is too young , Neves to immobile and Saul is too much tilting towards an box to box.

Ofcourse you might either of those with Fred or McT together with Pogba, but if we are talking a pure DM then only Rice/Ndidi could do that.
I’ve been contemplating this, trying to make sense of it all. Whilst i agree we’d need an even defensively better DMC for the 4-3-3 to work properly against the best teams, Camavinga for example might be enough for us to field Pogba-Camavinga-Bruno against low block defenses. Just an idea.

We’ll still have McFred, CamaFred, McVinga against better teams in a 4-2-3-1.

Another thought, what about one the DC’s as DMC? Both Maguire/Lindelof might be too immobile, but maybe Varane? I don’t know enough about his passing ability to fully assess that option i think. Anyway, i digress…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.