Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
There was a lot of interest, concrete interest, you weighed things up a bit, it had to work out for both the club and me, and it didn’t happen. It’s always nice to sit in a position and know that there were clubs that were very interested. There is nothing negative about clubs of that size being mentioned, but you shouldn’t put too much into it. It can be flared up by very little, and it is not necessarily always right, even if there were big and interesting clubs that were in the picture. Not everything on the internet is true.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Will go in the summer or maybe even in January for the right money - no signs he is signing a new contract so maximum value time.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It's funny how these "owned" journos try to find excuses for their clubs. "complicated", "big agent fees" just stop and admit you've missed on a top talent. Same goes for us. Brighton took the risk that is always there with young players, and now will make a huge profit.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Why should we care about the medical department at Chelsea?Tier 1:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I didn't post the Tweet for the medical department. I Tweeted it out to highlight that Chelsea will go after two people as part of their new footballing structure. A bunch of directors have been linked to Chelsea, all of whom have various transfer and squad-building strategies. They've been linked to several different sporting directors, and for the technical director role, they've been eyeing up Paul Mitchell.Why should we care about the medical department at Chelsea?
Serious question, so don't take offense if I have the wrong end of the stick, but are you a Chelsea fan, because I always had the idea you were a United fan.
But why do we need to have a blow by blow account of Chelsea rumours?I didn't post the Tweet for the medical department. I Tweeted it out to highlight that Chelsea will go after two people as part of their new footballing structure. A bunch of directors have been linked to Chelsea, all of whom have various transfer and squad-building strategies. They've been linked to several different sporting directors, and for the technical director role, they've been eyeing up Paul Mitchell.
On the bolded part, yes, of course I'm a United fan. I'm only posting the Chelsea news because they're going through a ton of changes that will affect their standing in the future and, thus, affect our top-4 prospects. They are a direct rival of ours for the CL spots, after all.
This isn't the United thread for one thing.But why do we need to have a blow by blow account of Chelsea rumours?
We get hardly anything about United, rumours, or otherwise.
As Roseguy said and as Zaphod mentioned a while back, this is focused on teams outside of United. Chelsea are going through tons of changes, so there are lots of major developments. I'm glossing through a ton of news from all of these teams and am only reporting major developments. It's just that Chelsea, like Barcelona in & before the summer window, have lots of major developments.But why do we need to have a blow by blow account of Chelsea rumours?
We get hardly anything about United, rumours, or otherwise.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Just the way we want it. Mazhar13 is one of us and we welcome him with open arms. We're taking over the caf, converting one poster at a timeChelsea Cafe
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Translation:Rafael Leão has not yet received a renewal offer from Milan.
The Portuguese's contract expires in 2024 and the Rossoneri want to extend it, but so far negotiations have stalled.
The Italian side want to move the deal forward in October and increase his salary to 6/7M.
In the summer, Chelsea informally offered a bid in excess of 100M, but Milan have referred to the 150M clause.
The Blues are still interested.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Believe that Leipzig did the same thing with Gvardiol that they did with Nkunku - extended them with a lower release clause.Whaat? Gvardiol's release clause is only £43m? We were supposedly bidding double that during the summer.
I mean getting Gvardiol and Nkunku for around 100m is pretty crazy when both would command at least 80m each without a release clause. So I'm not complainingBelieve that Leipzig did the same thing with Gvardiol that they did with Nkunku - extended them with a lower release clause.
It's definitely odd that it's so low but presumably this was done so no one kicked up a fuss when they weren't allowed to leave this past summer.
Oh it's extraordinarily good business if we can pull it off. Still need a midfielder but it's very encouraging. Can't help but think letting Werner go back at a discount was part of all this too.I mean getting Gvardiol and Nkunku for around 100m is pretty crazy when both would command at least 80m each without a release clause. So I'm not complaining
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date