That would free up a certain AG7..? Am I right?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That would free up a certain AG7..? Am I right?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Both Costa to Ateltico and Griezmann to us should have been done in summer if not for his damn transfer ban.That would free up a certain AG7..? Am I right?
You can buy players outside of the windows, just not registering them.I thought the window closed 3 weeks ago, what did I miss?
I remember when people actually thought he was bought as competition for De Gea, not as a temporary 2nd keeper to help relieve the pressure off of a young De Gea. Thought he would have a solid career at a mid-table club though.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
How does this work? He cant be registered as the window is closed. He is still a Chelsea player till Jan. Chelsea are paying his wages.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
ATL bought his registration would be my guess, they just can't submit that registration to La Liga due to the ban.How does this work? He cant be registered as the window is closed. He is still a Chelsea player till Jan. Chelsea are paying his wages.
They might ask Atl to pay a few extra million as transfer fees, but they still have to pay his wages till jan.
Once the transfer is agreed it can still go through and he'll officially be a Atletico player, he just can't be registered to any new league until January. So there would be no need for Chelsea to subsidise his wages at all.How does this work? He cant be registered as the window is closed. He is still a Chelsea player till Jan. Chelsea are paying his wages.
They might ask Atl to pay a few extra million as transfer fees, but they still have to pay his wages till jan.
Spending the Griezeman money already!
Hope so
Am not sure about this. Atletico can afford this sort of striker anyway, they bid a similar amount for lacazette in May.Welcome Griezmann
That's what I wasn't sure. Although the Lacazette bid could also have been when they were assuming that Griezeman might leave, before their ban was confirmed.Am not sure about this. Atletico can afford this sort of striker anyway, they bid a similar amount for lacazette in May.
Yeah well griezmann won't be there forever. It's more a question as to whether we are still front runners to buy him anymore. With Bale off the boil and Barcelona still needing to make a statement of sorts I wonder whether we have more competition this time round.That's what I wasn't sure. Although the Lacazette bid could also have been when they were assuming that Griezeman might leave, before their ban was confirmed.
Yeah that's true. I think we might need to go for a quick purchase in January and "swallow" the CL cup tied aspect to get him early.Yeah well griezmann won't be there forever. It's more a question as to whether we are still front runners to buy him anymore. With Bale off the boil and Barcelona still needing to make a statement of sorts I wonder whether we have more competition this time round.
If either Spanish club want him, hel go there IMHO.
Agreed.Chelsea and selling players. Masters. They sold for 55 mil player who is unwanted, who has 29 years( in october) and who was payed to the same club 40 mill. Respect