- Nov 6, 2013
160K a week surely that's not right
Myspace mate...ffs..facebook destroyed myspaceSince fairly recently, although things can accelerate pretty quickly in that sector. Twitter users are falling, the stock price has fallen and the CEO has dumped a load of shares. Not sure what your reference to Facebook is about.
Yeah, I don't get why people bother. It's easier when someone identifies 'with their own name' and says where he worked because all you have to do is Google it. The fact he gives out 'his name' gives him credibility, but his Twitter personna isn't real and he's no different to others. No point bothering with him.Ben Fairthorne doesn't exist. Well, maybe he does but he certainly isn't a journo who has worked with x, y and z company and has a zillion sources. He's indykaila with a dicky bow.
When I, and a lot of others, view the twitter thread, we want to see actual news, not utter crap spouted by ITK69 about something plucked from their arsecrack and retweeted and favourited into oblivion just because it links Suarez with a move to Caledonian Thistle or some other nonsense.
Highly doubt he'll come in and be our 3rd/4th highest earner. Hardly a credible source either.It might very well be true. We paying Ashley Young around 120k aren't we? Also, we weren't the only club in for him with Chelsea also sniffing around so I don't think it's that unbelievable that we've 'out offered' Chelsea to make sure we get our man.
Again it's debatable. We've lost quite a few high earners so there's some wages freed up. If we really wanted him badly then I can believe he will be offered good wages to block any other clubs out of the deal completely. We simply don't know. I'm simply saying that to say it's BS is uninformed and there are some logical reasons as to why we would offer that much.Highly doubt he'll come in and be our 3rd/4th highest earner. Hardly a credible source either.