NMF
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,932
160K a week surely that's not right
Myspace mate...ffs..facebook destroyed myspaceSince fairly recently, although things can accelerate pretty quickly in that sector. Twitter users are falling, the stock price has fallen and the CEO has dumped a load of shares. Not sure what your reference to Facebook is about.
Yeah, I don't get why people bother. It's easier when someone identifies 'with their own name' and says where he worked because all you have to do is Google it. The fact he gives out 'his name' gives him credibility, but his Twitter personna isn't real and he's no different to others. No point bothering with him.Ben Fairthorne doesn't exist. Well, maybe he does but he certainly isn't a journo who has worked with x, y and z company and has a zillion sources. He's indykaila with a dicky bow.
When I, and a lot of others, view the twitter thread, we want to see actual news, not utter crap spouted by ITK69 about something plucked from their arsecrack and retweeted and favourited into oblivion just because it links Suarez with a move to Caledonian Thistle or some other nonsense.
Highly doubt he'll come in and be our 3rd/4th highest earner. Hardly a credible source either.It might very well be true. We paying Ashley Young around 120k aren't we? Also, we weren't the only club in for him with Chelsea also sniffing around so I don't think it's that unbelievable that we've 'out offered' Chelsea to make sure we get our man.
If we actually do think he is worth it, Woodward needs a good wobble to wake him up from his fairyland!Like feck we'll pay an 18yr old 160k.
Goal.com strikes again.
Again it's debatable. We've lost quite a few high earners so there's some wages freed up. If we really wanted him badly then I can believe he will be offered good wages to block any other clubs out of the deal completely. We simply don't know. I'm simply saying that to say it's BS is uninformed and there are some logical reasons as to why we would offer that much.Highly doubt he'll come in and be our 3rd/4th highest earner. Hardly a credible source either.
Very good was awesome for Montpellier. He is very technical but doesn't have 1 inch of physicality in him.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Its also on marca and sport. Anyone know how good he is?
If Shaw is on 160k a week, then i will eat my left nut160k a week for Shaw sounds like something Chelsea would leak, giving their fans an excuse as to why they couldn't get him perhaps?
Quoted just for the lols.If Shaw is on 160k a week, then i will eat my left nut
It's more likely to be the case that Goal have just made the information up.160k a week for Shaw sounds like something Chelsea would leak, giving their fans an excuse as to why they couldn't get him perhaps?
We can rule out Maths and Spelling.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Joe cole completes a medical! What does a medical consist of off?
Oh right, yeah, I just meant another internet 'has been' like MySpace is now.Myspace mate...ffs..facebook destroyed myspace
Has anyone ever been described as having a cracking right foot? Only seems to apply to lefties.Cracking left foot.
If the reports are right, it's supposed to be from Barcelona and Manchester United.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Being able to get out of a car safely?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Joe cole completes a medical! What does a medical consist of off?
This, anyone who actually believes United will pay him this needs their head checking.160k a week for Shaw sounds like something Chelsea would leak, giving their fans an excuse as to why they couldn't get him perhaps?
I think Young's wages has spoil the market at United£160k pw?
It seems too crazy to be made up completely. I mean, if you're going to make stuff up you'd at least try to make it believable.It's more likely to be the case that Goal have just made the information up.
It's goal.com, no it doesn't.It seems too crazy to be made up completely. I mean, if you're going to make stuff up you'd at least try to make it believable.
Ban everyone and everything i say. Its all bs anyway.If we're going to ban BS accounts then we may as well ban tweets that use The Mirror as a source too.
Better yet.... BAN ALL TWEETS.If we're going to ban BS accounts then we may as well ban tweets that use The Mirror as a source too.