shaggy
Prefers blue over red, loathed by Spurs fans
SameI'll never call him ballbag again
SameI'll never call him ballbag again
I think you mean 'adept'.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Man utd are clearly only telling journos if we want a player if are close to signing that particular player of interest.
This is the right thing to do it in order to avoid embarrassment. Woody is learning fast, I am beginning to really like him. He is not only a financial inept, but a very good CEO..
If Woody pulls that off then the Blue Fairy will finally fulfil his wish and turn him into a real boy.Imagine.... Di Maria & Vidal in the last week of the window...
Don't get drawn in ffs!!
Sorry, auto-correct. That is it, I am going to disable that shiit, happened to me 4 times today!I think you mean 'adept'.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The indication from Old Trafford – where Di Maria is expected to be announced as a United player for a fee of around £60m on Tuesday – is that Milan’s Nigel de Jong will not be joining the club as a back-up option for Vidal.
I'd take De Jong over not buying any midfielder but yeah if this is true then a positive way of looking at it is that we are lining up someone better than De Jong (please be Vidal!).The suggestion that we've baulked at the £34m asking price for Vidal I find hard to believe. Ian Herbert is meant to be decent though isn't he?
Also from the article. Good news I think, didn't want him.
After selling di maria for 60m, I'm pretty sure Dortmund would need an offer of pretty much the same price to accept. No way in hell would they accept 35m right now.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This almost certainly what will happen. We but Di Maria for £60m and they get him for Reus for £35m. I am not saying we should not have signed Di Maria or he is over priced, but £35m is a steal for Reus.
Agree. I don't particularly rate Castles but the fact that he is an actual journalist who writes for The Times should be enough to keep him off the banned list.Banning tweets from actual journalists just because you don't like their opinions is really silly. Not all info they get can be accurate. Duncan Castles has gotten plenty of things right as well. The guy writes for Times after all. That Bruin guy shouldn't be banned either, obviously has sources within the club.
There is a £35m clause for Reus.After selling di maria for 60m, I'm pretty sure Dortmund would need an offer of pretty much the same price to accept. No way in hell would they accept 35m right now.
We don't laugh at his bullshit, he doesn't just spew fake deals, otherwise Sky would have got shot of him long ago. The issue is he is out the loop sometimes and pretends not to be. Then he goes on Revista and gives reasons to things such as why Ronaldo doesn't seem happy, as though he has just been talking to him on the phone.Ballague has been spot on with Mata and now Di Maria. We should finally cut him some slack.
Only comes into affect next year. Clause recently been rumored to be even lower actually.There is a £35m clause for Reus.
That starts next summer. No way are they selling this summer unless its for twice the price.There is a £35m clause for Reus.
I thought everyone was on the same page that Real Madrid will/might get Reus NEXT year. Sorry for the confusion.Only comes into affect next year. Clause recently been rumored to be even lower actually.
Think Bayern seem most likely for him.
Di Maria is at the very top of his game. He's the highest assist maker amongst all the big leagues and he's without doubt one of that top 5 players in the world in what he does. Add to the fact we have weak transfer negotiating power at the moment and we'd anyway be overpaying for Reus. Trust in the deal, we've got a superstar in our hands.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This almost certainly what will happen. We but Di Maria for £60m and they get him for Reus for £35m. I am not saying we should not have signed Di Maria or he is over priced, but £35m is a steal for Reus.
Sounds like autocorrect is not so...adeptSorry, auto-correct. That is it, I am going to disable that shiit, happened to me 4 times today!
Love that toon!
Balague said that staying in Madrid was his first option. When it became clear that Perez was being a dick ,we did the proverbial swoop.Excellent. Though why the deal was held up for too long?
Judging from our last few transfers, money isnt our problem. If LVG really wants Vidal, we'll get him.The suggestion that we've baulked at the £34m asking price for Vidal I find hard to believe. Ian Herbert is meant to be decent though isn't he?
Also from the article. Good news I think, didn't want him.
Will still struggle to fit him in. This Rodriguez deal caused a lot of problems and I don't think Reus is going to want to move there because they aren't going to play either him or Ronaldo as an out and out striker.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This almost certainly what will happen. We but Di Maria for £60m and they get him for Reus for £35m. I am not saying we should not have signed Di Maria or he is over priced, but £35m is a steal for Reus.
Id say the fee would be around £40 million + Hernandez but our chances of getting Vidal is a bit more than 1% IMO.Vidal for £35 million + Hernandez, I'd make that deal every single time.
Likelyhood of it actually being true? 1%.
I can see PSG going for Hazard and Chelsea for Reus next summer.Will still struggle to fit him in. This Rodriguez deal caused a lot of problems and I don't think Reus is going to want to move there because they aren't going to play either him or Ronaldo as an out and out striker.
Hazard is going to cost them somewhere in the region of another £50m+. It depends on how much revenue they can generate this year. Also Chelsea are stronger than PSG at the moment. I don't know why he would want to leave.I can see PSG going for Hazard ans Chelsea for Reus.
Read that as "cut his sack".Ballague has been spot on with Mata and now Di Maria. We should finally cut him some slack.
So does Oliver Kay: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/mar/18/times-duped-hoax-qatar-dream-football-storyBanning tweets from actual journalists just because you don't like their opinions is really silly. Not all info they get can be accurate. Duncan Castles has gotten plenty of things right as well. The guy writes for Times after all. That Bruin guy shouldn't be banned either, obviously has sources within the club.
I would sell him abroad for lower price if that was the only way to stop him from joining rival club. But who knowsThat starts next summer. No way are they selling this summer unless its for twice the price.
The problem is his massive wages but I guess Chelsea will subsidy a lot just to get rid of him.Apparently he wants it to be a permanent move. How much would Chelsea be able to sell him for?
I doubt Milan would pay more than 15mil for him to be fair.
I'm impressed that you want to keep Anderson.We should send Juventus a package of Cleverley, Young, Hernandez and Valencia.
£15m? They aren't going to spend the Balotelli money entirely on Torres. That would be a shit deal for Milan.Apparently he wants it to be a permanent move. How much would Chelsea be able to sell him for?
I doubt Milan would pay more than 15mil for him to be fair.
Stemmed from the Thiago deal, which did look likely at the time to be fairI never understood why Balague faced such criticism on RedCafe, he's called quite a lot right... He sussed de Gea to United a good few months in advance.
Oh dear, I don't think any of the fans would be.Anyone listening to Talksport? Just had Mitten on, who said despite the Dutch claims United denied there had been any talks. Also said he thought United would be happy with their lot if the deadlines arrived no one else was brought in...