Annihilate Now!
...or later, I'm not fussy
We'd probably let him go for free if a club wanted him.
He'll be rummaging around in League 1 or somewhere in a few years.
He'll be rummaging around in League 1 or somewhere in a few years.
Almost certainly not.Interesting, I wonder if anyone in the Netherlands will make a late move for him tomorrow.
Last game before the injury, he wasn't a dud. Would have been a decent and cheap back up option.
Try and reintegrate him?
Why? He's nowhere near good enough.
But he is excess to requirements. Not needed even as back up - we have Dorgu, Dalot, Leon and Shaw able to play thereBy all accounts a sound guy and a professional. Not nearly as cancerous as others we've recently booted
He flopped at PSV, he's most likely not good enough for Utd, especially after the injuries.I don't know. Maybe he has a second wind or something. Although he was really bad going forward. At least he isn't a disruptive personality.
speculative by Mitten, but still. seems pretty harsh to me:
Thinking about it, I think Malacia’s agent needs to be working overtime before these other windows shut to get him somewhere, even if on loan for the reasons you mention (we’ll end up subsidising that for the most part).For players like him and Sancho though, I just feel like it makes sense to try and pursue a loan... It gives them the opportunity to get this salary again for another year and then they may even get a small (in football terms) sign on bonus when they join a new club on a free. It's the best financial decision as they surely know they aren't going to be able to demand the same money ever again.
Yeah he was a fairly low risk option signed as a backup to Shaw basically, but I think my only gripe was that we had Alvaro on our books at the time, didn’t we? Guess no one could guess how it would all work out, and injuries destroying Malacia.He was a relatively low risk option for the club to go for. I was OK with us trying to purchase cheaper players and see if they can develop into starters or be good enough for the bench - sadly, he's neither.
Hopefully the guy hasn't been silly with his money, as he gets probably in the range of £3million a year. Had that for three years with us so far, we might just not extend his contract next time (he's in his final year with a +1 option). He will not get anywhere close to that salary again, but he might be able to play at mid-or-low placing sides in a weaker league (probably not in Spain/Italy/Germany) where he can still earn a good living for a 10~ years.
I'll be happy if we can sell him to a Turkish side this window, best of luck to him if he finds a club. I'd have expected a club to have paid £2-3m for him though!
For players like him and Sancho though, I just feel like it makes sense to try and pursue a loan... It gives them the opportunity to get this salary again for another year and then they may even get a small (in football terms) sign on bonus when they join a new club on a free. It's the best financial decision as they surely know they aren't going to be able to demand the same money ever again.
I would give Heavan a go before himWonder could he do a job as an emergency DM if required? He’s strong, reasonable pace, good tackler and ok passing short distances
He was already injured when Alvaro should have been given a chance. We actively chose to have no LB instead of Alvaro.Another Ten Hag special. Cant believe we used him rather than giving Alvaro a chance.
He can't even do a job in his own position, he certainly can't in a position he has never played before.Wonder could he do a job as an emergency DM if required? He’s strong, reasonable pace, good tackler and ok passing short distances
I would give Heaton a go before Malacia at DM.I would give Heavan a go before him
He can't even do a job in his own position, he certainly can't in a position he has never played before.
Will end up on loan at a mid-table Turkish side. Would love to know the logic in offering him 75k a week. Relatively, that's a bloody insane contract.
Well that’s where he played for arsenal before they converted him to CBI would give Heavan a go before him
How can you know? I’m sure that we all said John OShea can’t play CM or GK, Phil Neville can’t play CM etc. we don’t know what’s tried in training to make up teamsHe can't even do a job in his own position, he certainly can't in a position he has never played before.
Will end up on loan at a mid-table Turkish side. Would love to know the logic in offering him 75k a week. Relatively, that's a bloody insane contract.
May as well give me a shot in midfield with that logic. Sure you never know until we try it out.How can you know? I’m sure that we all said John OShea can’t play CM or GK, Phil Neville can’t play CM etc. we don’t know what’s tried in training to make up teams
And I am only talking about extreme emergencies
May as well give me a shot in midfield with that logic. Sure you never know until we try it out.
O'Shea & Neville were known for being versatile even at youth level, they were both actually good footballers and capable of playing in their primary positions to a high standard, something which Malacia isn't. We saw him be terrible time after time in his own position last season. Literally no club wants him. No, he can't play CM for Manchester United.
Im not comparing them ffs. What’s wrong with you?Yeah comparing this fella to Phil Neville and O'Shea is quite an insult to them. Both were regular starters for united, both playing nearly 400 games for the club with distinction.
Not fit to lace their boots etc. literally.
This, and if he doesnt find a taker in the next 2 weeks, I expect the club and Malacia to work on a buyout. No point in keeping him around.One of the leagues whose window hasn't closed yet will take him providing we cover wages.
I was just thinking back to when we bought him on ETH list because he was impressed how he had played against Antony when ETH was coaching Ajax
Antony. I feel like I could have defended against Antony.
We really did let ETH have too much influence
Agreed, he was well known for his versatilityWhile true, the Netherlands were picking him and even playing him at CB touting his versatility to play on the left or at cb. So its not just ETH.
Not a huge amount at MUFC.
the case with Malacia is not about his footballing abilities. there is something else. wages, doping, injury. not sure.May as well give me a shot in midfield with that logic. Sure you never know until we try it out.
O'Shea & Neville were known for being versatile even at youth level, they were both actually good footballers and capable of playing in their primary positions to a high standard, something which Malacia isn't. We saw him be terrible time after time in his own position last season. Literally no club wants him. No, he can't play CM for Manchester United.
