United's midfield woes 2025-2026

The Purley King said:
I’m just about to watch highlights of the game, so can’t really comment too much but playing 2 in CM with one of them being Bruno is suicide.
There is not a CM in the world who can cover for Bruno’s deficiencies in that position.
He’s a fabulous 10 but a way below average CM.
We stick with this = Amorim gone by January.
We should not and cannot ignore this issue.
Click to expand...
This is indeed our problem, but even as a 10, too much revolves around Bruno and his wastefulness outcounts his production in my opinion.

But, we are stuck with him, therefore, rather than Sesko, who I am not convinced about, we might think about a front 3 of Cunha, Mbuemo and Fernandes, with the latter dropping into the 10 role and the former two taking it in turns to play further up front, and buying a bonafida CM for even this constellation to have a hope of working. Ideally, Bruno goes to SA.
 
Last edited:
Bastian said:
Click to expand...

I could have told him this last May, yet you'd like to think he knew this last March so we could be planning for it in this window.

I haven't been impressed with this window at all. Change with INEOS? What change. The same old will happen, come the end of the window we will be scrapping around for a midfielder who we will pay over the odds for and will end up being shit. I just find it staggering we go into a transfer window every year like we make it up as we go along. It's no different with the striker scenario, why were we not sorting this out at the start of the window.
 
astracrazy said:
I could have told him this last May, yet you'd like to think he knew this last March so we could be planning for it in this window.

I haven't been impressed with this window at all. Change with INEOS? What change. The same old will happen, come the end of the window we will be scrapping around for a midfielder who we will pay over the odds for and will end up being shit. I just find it staggering we go into a transfer window every year like we make it up as we go along. It's no different with the striker scenario, why were we not sorting this out at the start of the window.
Click to expand...

I think he's known since November last year. Or earlier if he took an interest in United before then.
 
ATXRedDevil said:
This is spot on. This team is crying out for a different CCB as much as anything. Diamonde played that role at Sporting and it’s just a different level of athleticism than De Ligt and Maguire. Diamonde would move up to play as a 6 and provide cover for the midfield for sporting. Of course, to do that properly, your wide CBs need more pace. I really like De Ligt and Maguire but neither are perfect fits for either the wide CB roles or the CCB roles.
Click to expand...
Indeed. Its also true Pace in wide cbs helps. BUT what helps more is after the ball is progressed into the final third they don't stay so wide. They instead should be tucked in on either side of the DM in the rest defence. With the center cb deeper ready to move into a wide area to slow down any attack there either side. Then the two cbs and DM can delay and retreat to the box or repel a counter as a group of three. Ensuring the sole DM never has to cover two people as he attempts to shield the defence. Making it in turn easier for him to delay opponent progress or out right win the ball back since he isn't covering acres of space attempting to impede two people.

Whilst the rest of the team retreats towards the side the counter attack is headed to reduce the space and counter press for the ball from behind.
 
Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber said:
Indeed. Its also true Pace in wide cbs helps. BUT what helps more is after the ball is progressed into the final third they don't stay so wide. They instead should be tucked in on either side of the DM in the rest defence. With the center cb deeper ready to move into a wide area to slow down any attack there either side. Then the two cbs and DM can delay and retreat to the box or repel a counter as a group of three. Ensuring the sole DM never has to cover two people as he attempts to shield the defence. Making it in turn easier for him to delay opponent progress or out right win the ball back since he isn't covering acres of space attempting to impede two people.

Whilst the rest of the team retreats towards the side the counter attack is headed to reduce the space and counter press for the ball from behind.
Click to expand...
Yep. It seems obvious to me, for this system to really work in today's game your CMs have to be focused on ball retrieval/recycling possession and the creativity/passing range comes from the CBs who push up and come into the midfield. It seems fanciful to think we will be able to essentially pick up two £80m+ players (as that's what we will need if we want someone who can basically to do everything to a high level like Rice, Cauceido, Rodri etc.)

I'd like to see us pick up a mobile, aggressive CM to partner Ugarte whose responsibilities become much more basic i.e. simple passes when building possession, very aggressive in their pressing to support the attacking 5 (WB, 10, CF, 10, WB) and screening the CBs if we are forced back into our own half i.e. Onana, Fernandes, Anderson (no comment on ability but this broad skillset) and then look for much CBs with much more expansive passing and pace i.e. Hien, Thiaw, van Hecke, Harwood-Bellis (lots of passes into final third with good % completion rates) who we can develop. Rome was not built in a day and the Glazer leeching of United will not be a quick fix, there has to be a lot more onus on coaching and putting a system in place that gets us punching above our spending power for the next season or two.
 
I fear we will struggle massively in midfield again this season without proper investment. Our current crop of CM’s each has their own strengths but none of them are well-rounded.

Mainoo is press-resistant and can dribble but his passing isn’t good enough and defensively he’s a liability due to his lack of pace.

Ugarte covers ground but is poor on the ball.

Casemiro brings experience and is good in duels but his legs are gone. Occasionally, he plays a killer pass but in general, his passing is erratic.

Bruno brings dynamism and is our most creative passer (which is why he should play as a 10 exclusively) but he can neither defend nor dictate play like we need to.

Would gave much preferred us spending the Šeško money on someone like Baleba and gone for a striker on loan.
 
tomaldinho1 said:
Yep. It seems obvious to me, for this system to really work in today's game your CMs have to be focused on ball retrieval/recycling possession and the creativity/passing range comes from the CBs who push up and come into the midfield. It seems fanciful to think we will be able to essentially pick up two £80m+ players (as that's what we will need if we want someone who can basically to do everything to a high level like Rice, Cauceido, Rodri etc.)

I'd like to see us pick up a mobile, aggressive CM to partner Ugarte whose responsibilities become much more basic i.e. simple passes when building possession, very aggressive in their pressing to support the attacking 5 (WB, 10, CF, 10, WB) and screening the CBs if we are forced back into our own half i.e. Onana, Fernandes, Anderson (no comment on ability but this broad skillset) and then look for much CBs with much more expansive passing and pace i.e. Hien, Thiaw, van Hecke, Harwood-Bellis (lots of passes into final third with good % completion rates) who we can develop. Rome was not built in a day and the Glazer leeching of United will not be a quick fix, there has to be a lot more onus on coaching and putting a system in place that gets us punching above our spending power for the next season or two.
Click to expand...
True story. I think adding Yoro and Heaven was step in the right direction. I hope the likes of Shaw and Maguire can be replaced with similar.

I also hope we can get a robust box to box type midfield play maker. Like what Nunes was at Sporting and Wolves. Its the one profile of midfielder we currently lack.
 
I am more concerned about a striker.
If we get Šeško then that’s nearly £200m. If we don’t I think we will get Watkins.

The likelyhood is that we will then be skint. I think as the window closes we will see Gernacho and Sancho sold for less than we wanted which will allow a midfielder to come in the final days of the window.
 
I don’t think we are going to sign a midfielder this year. Wouldn’t really make any sense to sign one just to add numbers, we already have many in our squad for a 2-man midfield we will be playing. It would need to be someone who would represent a significant upgrade over our current players, and I don’t think we can afford it this year.

A rotation of Ugarte, Casemiro, Collyer, Bruno, Mount and Mainoo should be OK. We have no Europe and will be playing a 2-man midfield most of the time so there won’t even be enough minutes to go by between the six players I just mentioned.

At the end of season Bruno and Casemiro may both go to Saudi/US, Mount could move on, and then we would likely be able to sign 1-2 players to replace them.
 
Sarni said:
I don’t think we are going to sign a midfielder this year. Wouldn’t really make any sense to sign one just to add numbers, we already have many in our squad for a 2-man midfield we will be playing. It would need to be someone who would represent a significant upgrade over our current players, and I don’t think we can afford it this year.

A rotation of Ugarte, Casemiro, Collyer, Bruno, Mount and Mainoo should be OK. We have no Europe and will be playing a 2-man midfield most of the time so there won’t even be enough minutes to go by between the six players I just mentioned.

At the end of season Bruno and Casemiro may both go to Saudi/US, Mount could move on, and then we would likely be able to sign 1-2 players to replace them.
Click to expand...

I think we'll be fine with regards to keeping them fresh, there's more than enough for the two positions. But I think a lot of midfielders would be an improvement on what we have. Loads. But as with striker and GK, we don't just want to spend money to get better than a level that is clearly not good enough, we want to invest in players who are either good enough or show great promise in becoming so. And in that sense, there are not many around at a price that is favourable. If we are on a credit card spending spree though, I hope we buy that one midfielder to fix half the midfield, as it will raise the floor for all the other positions in the side (same as replacing Onana as #1).
 
In an ideal world we would get Tchouaméni in on loan with obligation to buy

But I think the midfield should be left to next summer as we can get by with the options we have as we have a smaller schedule
 
Bastian said:
I think we'll be fine with regards to keeping them fresh, there's more than enough for the two positions. But I think a lot of midfielders would be an improvement on what we have. Loads. But as with striker and GK, we don't just want to spend money to get better than a level that is clearly not good enough, we want to invest in players who are either good enough or show great promise in becoming so. And in that sense, there are not many around at a price that is favourable. If we are on a credit card spending spree though, I hope we buy that one midfielder to fix half the midfield, as it will raise the floor for all the other positions in the side (same as replacing Onana as #1).
Click to expand...
The problem is Bruno will likely play every game still, and I’d rather keep him in midfield than have him rotate with Cunha/Mbeumo as that’d disrupt the formation, and we have enough players to pair with him in a more defensive role.

You’d ideally want a defensive midfielder that can carry the ball and a dynamic midfielder that covers a lot of ground in this formation, or maybe even two of the latter but we will have to survive with Bruno + DM until next year.

In a hindsight we probably shouldn’t have signed Ugarte last year. Mainoo’s development has also stalled which has thrown a wrench into our long term plans.
 
Sarni said:
The problem is Bruno will likely play every game still, and I’d rather keep him in midfield than have him rotate with Cunha/Mbeumo as that’d disrupt the formation, and we have enough players to pair with him in a more defensive role.

You’d ideally want a defensive midfielder that can carry the ball and a dynamic midfielder that covers a lot of ground in this formation, or maybe even two of the latter but we will have to survive with Bruno + DM until next year.

In a hindsight we probably shouldn’t have signed Ugarte last year. Mainoo’s development has also stalled which has thrown a wrench into our long term plans.
Click to expand...

As is, I think Bruno will have to play centre midfield. It's not ideal. I've made numerous posts about where I'm at with it. We have, as yous say, enough players to pair with him. Those players are Casemiro and Ugarte. Neither offers what is needed next to Bruno. Mainoo is the question mark going into the season, in terms of progression and where he actually fits best.

It's hard to imagine we could both get a physically outstanding player who could also collect the ball from deep and recycle or carry the ball under pressure. If it's one or the other, I think we need that player who is press resistant, calm on the ball with a good passing range.

This season though, the most important aspect about midfield is making sure that Bruno is disciplined, and if he's not, that he's subbed off or dropped. He can't be making stupid passes time and again in unfavourable situations. He simply has to be more responsible.
 
Sarni said:
I don’t think we are going to sign a midfielder this year. Wouldn’t really make any sense to sign one just to add numbers, we already have many in our squad for a 2-man midfield we will be playing. It would need to be someone who would represent a significant upgrade over our current players, and I don’t think we can afford it this year.

A rotation of Ugarte, Casemiro, Collyer, Bruno, Mount and Mainoo should be OK. We have no Europe and will be playing a 2-man midfield most of the time so there won’t even be enough minutes to go by between the six players I just mentioned.

At the end of season Bruno and Casemiro may both go to Saudi/US, Mount could move on, and then we would likely be able to sign 1-2 players to replace them.
Click to expand...
I see this scenario as likely as well but I consider it a strategic mistake. If this season is supposed to prepare a team that will start to compete from the season after onwards, then I see that at risk if the plan is to completely exchange the centre of pitch players as I think, this will change the dynamic of the team a lot so stuff will have to be adjusted once again. And with new acquisitions it may take them a year to bed in, yadda yadda. I think the midfield area is too important to be let lying bare for one year. I think we should bring in somebody who we think could be a starter, then assess if we consider Mainoo for that role in the future and we could look how Kone develops during the next 12 month. Thats what I would do at least. I'd probably try to get rid of Casemiro as well and bring in a useful midfielder from the decent-to-good shelf in the right physical condition. Maybe even on loan.
 
I have mentioned in the Carrick appreciation thread that he is the type we miss sorely. But it's true, somehow our club has been negligent on midfield signings for quite a while now. As Keane said, to play midfield for United one is expected to do well up and down in defence and attack.

Our attempts at replacing Carrick the past decade has included (at best): aging Matic, Eriksen.

For half a season each where we looked semi competent: Pogba - Matic, Eriksen - Casemiro

City, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent loads to refresh to their centre midfield
 
Sarni said:
I don’t think we are going to sign a midfielder this year. Wouldn’t really make any sense to sign one just to add numbers, we already have many in our squad for a 2-man midfield we will be playing. It would need to be someone who would represent a significant upgrade over our current players, and I don’t think we can afford it this year.

A rotation of Ugarte, Casemiro, Collyer, Bruno, Mount and Mainoo should be OK. We have no Europe and will be playing a 2-man midfield most of the time so there won’t even be enough minutes to go by between the six players I just mentioned.

At the end of season Bruno and Casemiro may both go to Saudi/US, Mount could move on, and then we would likely be able to sign 1-2 players to replace them.
Click to expand...

NZT-One said:
I see this scenario as likely as well but I consider it a strategic mistake. If this season is supposed to prepare a team that will start to compete from the season after onwards, then I see that at risk if the plan is to completely exchange the centre of pitch players as I think, this will change the dynamic of the team a lot so stuff will have to be adjusted once again. And with new acquisitions it may take them a year to bed in, yadda yadda. I think the midfield area is too important to be let lying bare for one year. I think we should bring in somebody who we think could be a starter, then assess if we consider Mainoo for that role in the future and we could look how Kone develops during the next 12 month. Thats what I would do at least. I'd probably try to get rid of Casemiro as well and bring in a useful midfielder from the decent-to-good shelf in the right physical condition. Maybe even on loan.
Click to expand...
Bruno did not stay with us just to help us get to top 4/top 6 and then leave next season.
He wants to win trophies. If we do well this season, he will continue with us in hopes of finally winning something the season after.

He may only leave next summer if we're still in shambles and it's better for him to go make the big bucks.
Instead of staying with us and waste time struggling continuously.
 
Dr Foo said:
I have mentioned in the Carrick appreciation thread that he is the type we miss sorely. But it's true, somehow our club has been negligent on midfield signings for quite a while now. As Keane said, to play midfield for United one is expected to do well up and down in defence and attack.

Our attempts at replacing Carrick the past decade has included (at best): aging Matic, Eriksen.

For half a season each where we looked semi competent: Pogba - Matic, Eriksen - Casemiro

City, Liverpool and Chelsea have spent loads to refresh to their centre midfield
Click to expand...

Carrick is a nuanced skilled midfielder. Who we need now is really a athletic Roy Keane to partner Bruno
 
Hopefully by the end of summer 2026 we have added a strong, deeplying playmaker with amazing passing skills, as well as a box to box player who can defend and tackle on top. We wont solve all our problems this window and will suffer some more this year
 
Sorting the attack out gets us into the top 6/7 next season.

Sorting the midfield out aswell gets us in contention for the title.

There were problems all over the pitch last season, if we go into the new season with an entirely different front 3 that can, in theory, all score 10+ goals then we're in a much better position.

There will still be matches this season where our midfield (or lack of) costs us but having three attackers that can actually score will allow us to win a significant number of matches against the bottom half. It will be games like Arsenal/city/Liverpool where we might not have enough.
 
KStandBarmyArmy1993 said:
Sorting the attack out gets us into the top 6/7 next season.

Sorting the midfield out aswell gets us in contention for the title.

There were problems all over the pitch last season, if we go into the new season with an entirely different front 3 that can, in theory, all score 10+ goals then we're in a much better position.

There will still be matches this season where our midfield (or lack of) costs us but having three attackers that can actually score will allow us to win a significant number of matches against the bottom half. It will be games like Arsenal/city/Liverpool where we might not have enough.
Click to expand...

Agree. It's clear that INEOS's plan is to sort out the midfield next summer when Casemiro also leaves. So hoping that our current options in midfield should be sufficient to get us a top 6 finish.
 
KStandBarmyArmy1993 said:
Sorting the attack out gets us into the top 6/7 next season.

Sorting the midfield out aswell gets us in contention for the title.

There were problems all over the pitch last season, if we go into the new season with an entirely different front 3 that can, in theory, all score 10+ goals then we're in a much better position.

There will still be matches this season where our midfield (or lack of) costs us but having three attackers that can actually score will allow us to win a significant number of matches against the bottom half. It will be games like Arsenal/city/Liverpool where we might not have enough.
Click to expand...
To be fair, those 3 games won't matter as much for as those vs supposed cannon fodder. If we can murder all the rest bar the expected top 4 with what we have now +Sesko. That would be a significant leap in progress.
 
leontas said:
Agree. It's clear that INEOS's plan is to sort out the midfield next summer when Casemiro also leaves. So hoping that our current options in midfield should be sufficient to get us a top 6 finish.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure our current midfield is sufficient to get us to the top 6. Ugarte is not good enough. Mainoo will only function as an '8' if we get an improvement on Ugarte. We need a driving force in midfield , which neither Ugarte or Mainoo is
 
Was hoping for Kone as our '8' but apparently he's going out on loan
 
Sarni said:
I don’t think we are going to sign a midfielder this year. Wouldn’t really make any sense to sign one just to add numbers, we already have many in our squad for a 2-man midfield we will be playing. It would need to be someone who would represent a significant upgrade over our current players, and I don’t think we can afford it this year.

A rotation of Ugarte, Casemiro, Collyer, Bruno, Mount and Mainoo should be OK. We have no Europe and will be playing a 2-man midfield most of the time so there won’t even be enough minutes to go by between the six players I just mentioned.

At the end of season Bruno and Casemiro may both go to Saudi/US, Mount could move on, and then we would likely be able to sign 1-2 players to replace them.
Click to expand...
We should've got Palhinha on loan, and give us a bit breathing room until next season. He'd be an improvement over majority of our CMs.
 
dutchred said:
I'm not sure our current midfield is sufficient to get us to the top 6. Ugarte is not good enough. Mainoo will only function as an '8' if we get an improvement on Ugarte. We need a driving force in midfield , which neither Ugarte or Mainoo is
Click to expand...
Ugarte was up and down rather than outright awful. A liability at times, but was also the cafe's MOTM 6 times last season, only Amad and Bruno got more awards.

I think when you look at the general performance level of the team, a lot of players had probably their worst ever seasons. So I don't think what we saw last season is indicative of Ugarte's normal form, and I'm still hopeful that in a more stable team we might see the consistency he needs.
 
Spending near 200M on attack, when our midfield is in shambles...is a choice. A very Man Utd one.

We all know its not gonna work. But we will see the car crash unfold anyway.
 
Escobar said:
Hopefully by the end of summer 2026 we have added a strong, deeplying playmaker with amazing passing skills, as well as a box to box player who can defend and tackle on top. We wont solve all our problems this window and will suffer some more this year
Click to expand...

A strong deep lying playmaker is very rare. Even now, I couldn't think any.
 
Highfather_24 said:
Spending near 200M on attack, when our midfield is in shambles...is a choice. A very Man Utd one.

We all know it’s not gonna work. But we will see the car crash unfold anyway.
Click to expand...
We’re allergic to having a functional midfield. I hate that we never prioritise it.
 
Highfather_24 said:
Spending near 200M on attack, when our midfield is in shambles...is a choice. A very Man Utd one.

We all know its not gonna work. But we will see the car crash unfold anyway.
Click to expand...

It is indeed. We haven't really had a world class balanced midfield since well before Fergie retired. Christ, he took Scholes out of retirement to shore it up.
 
Highfather_24 said:
Spending near 200M on attack, when our midfield is in shambles...is a choice. A very Man Utd one.

We all know its not gonna work. But we will see the car crash unfold anyway.
Click to expand...
The stupidity is hard to fathom. Casemiro, Bruno, Ugarte, Mainoo and Collyer are not gonna win many 50/50 duels or second balls. Very low on pace and athleticism. Our midfield is terribly unbalanced so why don't we do anything about it? A better midfield and we would challenge for top 5. De Ligt stepping up into midfield is just laughable and is not the solution. He is too slow and not a great passer.
 
Highfather_24 said:
Spending near 200M on attack, when our midfield is in shambles...is a choice. A very Man Utd one.

We all know its not gonna work. But we will see the car crash unfold anyway.
Click to expand...

We still created more than enough chances to win considerably more games in the league last season, but Garnacho, Hojilund and Zirkzee couldn't hit a barn door. The midfield definitely needs sorting, but at least we've a chance of winning games despite it being poor as opposed to an attack that's completely toothless.
 
I wonder if we will ever again reach a point where our (central) midfield is sorted. It's been an issue for around 15 years dating back to the "static, slow motion zombie passing" days of Fergie's final years.

How can it be so hard to assemble a functioning, balanced midfield two/three with the amount of money we spend?
 
Highfather_24 said:
Spending near 200M on attack, when our midfield is in shambles...is a choice. A very Man Utd one.

We all know its not gonna work. But we will see the car crash unfold anyway.
Click to expand...

I’m hoping we will bring someone in before the window shuts but not going to hold my breath, I assume we are going to try and make do.

The only mitigation is not everything can be fixed in one window and the attack was also a big mess. But next summer there is going to have to be big investment in a couple of midfielders as well as a keeper. We are going to really struggle in midfield in pretty much every game with our current options.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.