buckooo1978
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 13,883
the redundancies are more about streamlining a bloated staff from what Ive read which of course is no comfort to the poor people who have lost their jobs. The redundancies are more operationally minded than financially driven perhaps.The tweets above are all about what we 'could spend' through FFP/PSR. Saying it's 'a disgrace' if we don't spend towards the limits is nonsense. Brighton could spend loads under FFP, doesn't mean they go and do it.
I remember reading about our finances a few months back and I said they look dire. I think it will be a year of getting things back under control to be able to spend bigger in the future.
Im no expert on all this but I'm pretty certain we won't see a massive net spend while we are making 250 redundancies.
It would completely undermine what INEOS are trying to do if we went out and acted like Chelsea.
A well-run club doesnt go out and spend huge amounts with highly paid players unlikely to get a game on the books.
Its not a quick fix but Im happy to wait for us to shift a few more before adding.
Even if we only get shot of AWB Id still expect us to buy a couple more but hopefully we can say goodbye to a number