Adamsk7
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,706
Not very.So how unpopular of an opinion is this?
Not very.So how unpopular of an opinion is this?
Yeah in general I think we targeted him because he played a position of need and offered a cheap, youngish option that wouldn't really do us any harm if he didn't work out. I simply just don't think he has the technique required at this level, and his footballing iq doesn't make up for that either. So what tends to happen is he gets into great positions but squanders it constantly because he isn't allowed enough time on the ball that he needs to be effective.I agree with many similar posts on here. James is one of those many players you see, at all levels of the game, that look a handful with their pace and mobility, but that have poor end product and decision making and just don't hurt teams like they could.
He was very lucky to be signed by a club like Man United as a first team squad player at 21. I can fully understand buying an U18 player with those raw abilities and hoping they'll hone their technical talent and end product coming through the youth system. And I can understand those academy products, once at the club, getting some first team opportunities while they're still raw and a work in progress.
But United buying someone still at that raw level at 21, to be immediately integrated into the first team squad? Well, he was very lucky. Because there's plenty of players with raw pace and work ethic, but a real lack of end product, plying their trade at much lower levels of the game. And you really should have a lot more about your game than that, by 21, to earn a move to United's first team.
I might be wrong but at the time we were signing him, I read somewhere that Giggs recommended him.Yeah in general I think we targeted him because he played a position of need and offered a cheap, youngish option that wouldn't really do us any harm if he didn't work out. I simply just don't think he has the technique required at this level, and his footballing iq doesn't make up for that either. So what tends to happen is he gets into great positions but squanders it constantly because he isn't allowed enough time on the ball that he needs to be effective.
Please make it stop..In before new contract to protect his value.
So a kind of silent domination?Dan James has the tools to be a quality player, the problem is, his main weapon of pace and acceleration is not seen as a skill. I think many football fans tend to judge skill over physical qualities and try to justify their negative assessment based on this.
He may not get the assists or goals that players in his role tend to be judged on, but his workrate and selfless running creates problems for the opposition and is another area that gets overlooked. If anything I see him is a very much under valued player and he can come in and play 15-20 games a season and not cause any problems.
feel like you’ve been watching a parallel universe version of Daniel James. I will concede speed, but ability? The guy is a bumhe has the ability to terrorise defence
Good enough to even be on the bench. I get your point; "he is just a fringe squad player, its not like he will start much anyway so why worry", i get that.Good enough for what? He's a fringe squad player at best when everyone is fit and available. Now we have Sancho we'll be seeing even less of him. He was signed for 15m on the off chance he could turn out to be a player, doesn't look like he will be. It's really not a big deal. He's a useful squad player who can do a job in certain games if needed. Hopefully he's not needed too often. My guess he'll become frustrated with lack of playing time and he'll either be loaned out or sold in the next 12 months.
We may well still sell him to Leeds or another club but we need his replacement to be upto speed with his roles in the team before we let James go. Amad is mentioned but I don’t think he’s ready to perform some of his defensive duties as well as James does.We should have sold him to Leeds, for some reason Bielsa likes him, tried to sign him multiple times so maybe he can have a decent career. I think for a team like Leeds he will be a good player where everything is done at 100mph.
If you read it how can you be wrong?I might be wrong but at the time we were signing him, I read somewhere that Giggs recommended him.
I dont think we really need James. Rashford will be back by October, we have 2 international breaks too.We may well still sell him to Leeds or another club but we need his replacement to be upto speed with his roles in the team before we let James go. Amad is mentioned but I don’t think he’s ready to perform some of his defensive duties as well as James does.
That’s the reason Ole hasn’t let him go yet.
But time is definitely running out for him.
I think James’ defensive efforts are key in his selection and Mata will basically be a backup incase of too many injuries or if someone isn’t up to the level which happens so often.I dont think we really need James. Rashford will be back by October, we have 2 international breaks too.
Cavani, Martial as CFs. Martial, Greenwood, Sancho as wingers and then we have players like Mata, Amad to play when needed.
When you know player is not good enough and there are buyers, we should sell them. We shouldn't accumulate poor players. Also we have to offload to sign new players as we don't have squad spaces to register.
He doesn't have the tools. His first touch and control are championship standard, not an exaggeration. His decision making is awful. That's why he's a winger with searing pace who doesn't score goals or register assists.Dan James has the tools to be a quality player, the problem is, his main weapon of pace and acceleration is not seen as a skill. I think many football fans tend to judge skill over physical qualities and try to justify their negative assessment based on this.
He may not get the assists or goals that players in his role tend to be judged on, but his workrate and selfless running creates problems for the opposition and is another area that gets overlooked. If anything I see him is a very much under valued player and he can come in and play 15-20 games a season and not cause any problems.
Greenwood is easily first choice and if Martial starts as LW the Greenwood will be backup for Sancho.I think James’ defensive efforts are key in his selection and Mata will basically be a backup incase of too many injuries or if someone isn’t up to the level which happens so often.
James is also pushing the ones above him in the chain while also aspiring to take their spots. He’s hungry enough to keep pushing and that’s vital in the grand scheme of things. Many players succumb to the pressure and lose their spots. James is still around the corner and still young.
I think we’re giving him another season and wouldn’t rather sell him. Let’s be honest, if we sell him what we’ll receive isn’t much in the grand scheme of things. What if he comes good this season? His value will increase atleast 10m. Maybe more.
Knowing the players just played euros and have to play a mid-season World Cup I’m sure Ole doesn’t mind extra help. Many of our players now play a key role in their international teams and injuries are always a factor.
Then he wakes up. This kid doesn't have a single clue how to dribble a ballI think he's the type of player where if you are 1-0 up and want to wear the opposition down in the last 10 minutes you can bring Dan James on and watch them chase him round the pitch.
We should cash in now. Pogba is ahead of him too at lw.If Rashford wasn’t injured we may have cashed in on him seeing no one else is in much demand.
I think this is his last chance. If he doesn’t do any wonders this season, he’ll be sold. There’s still a few clubs who can exploit his strengths but he isn’t refined enough for us.
Yes. Good post.Dan James has the tools to be a quality player, the problem is, his main weapon of pace and acceleration is not seen as a skill. I think many football fans tend to judge skill over physical qualities and try to justify their negative assessment based on this.
He may not get the assists or goals that players in his role tend to be judged on, but his workrate and selfless running creates problems for the opposition and is another area that gets overlooked. If anything I see him is a very much under valued player and he can come in and play 15-20 games a season and not cause any problems.
Ability as in when you’ve got speed you can kick it pass a player and run. Not much more then that unfortunately but has potential…feel like you’ve been watching a parallel universe version of Daniel James. I will concede speed, but ability? The guy is a bum
Imo we'll see him going to another club by Jan, probably Leeds. We will have Rashford fully back by then. We have Martial and Pogba. We have Greenwood so even Sancho would play there sometime. Elanga and Amad also would need minutes if we don't loan them out. I simply don't see his future here.If Rashford wasn’t injured we may have cashed in on him seeing no one else is in much demand.
I think this is his last chance. If he doesn’t do any wonders this season, he’ll be sold. There’s still a few clubs who can exploit his strengths but he isn’t refined enough for us.
Sounds about rightIn before new contract to protect his value.
Agreed.I think that overall James has been a worthwhile signing, he definitely contributed more than most during that tricky 1st transitional season. Even though he's not that easy on the eye at times and a bit of a one-trick pony, he still produced a decent number of assists. Recently, it's become very clear that he is far more effective on the left than the right, and I think this has contributed to him looking a poorer player than he really is.
However, this is another example now of the club not knowing how to get maximum value for it's players. I believe, on the back of a decent Euro's and a reasonable end to last season, we could probably get £35m for James.
Instead, what we will inevitably do is keep him, give him one game in every ten, his performances will drop off, he'll get near to the end of his contract and we will either loan or sell for way below his value.
We seem to have sorted out SIGNING players, now we have to get to grips with SELLING players, otherwise we'll never be able to build squads capable of taking on City
He doesn't. That's the issue.I think he needs to grow a pair, he has the speed and ability to terrorise defence but it feels like he bottles it incase he loses possession. I can’t see him getting much starts unless we have injuries or cup games. He’s another one that if we sell him we can free up some money towards a DM.
3 seasons, that’s the problem. Way too long to judge a player when he has shown little to no improvement and clearly isn’t good enough. This is why our club struggles to sell players. Just keep them on the books for as long as possible then lose them for nothing.If Rashford wasn’t injured we may have cashed in on him seeing no one else is in much demand.
I think this is his last chance. If he doesn’t do any wonders this season, he’ll be sold. There’s still a few clubs who can exploit his strengths but he isn’t refined enough for us.
I disagree, he’s speed gives him the ability to counter and he has played some important roles in some of our goals. Now is he good enough to be a Manchester United player? Absolutely not but give the lad some slack, the way some talk about him would have you believe he can’t tie he’s laces!He doesn't. That's the issue.
Yes and because Ole was new and raw then he accepted the advice of an old colleague who probably only did it on the hope it would improve him for Wales. We send better players out on loan ffs.I might be wrong but at the time we were signing him, I read somewhere that Giggs recommended him.