Van de Beek too expensive

Discussion in 'Transfer Forum' started by mitchmouse, Oct 8, 2019.

  1. Oct 8, 2019
    #1

    mitchmouse Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,192
    Newspapers are claiming we aren't interested because £35m is too much... of course it might be rubbish but if true: who do the club think they can get who is better? And surely everyone knows that £35m isn't that much any more when it comes to transfers (whether you think it's a lot of money generally is irrelevant). I mean we paid £50m for Fred...
  2. Oct 8, 2019
    #2

    Rajma Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    5,023
    Location:
    Vilnius
    Not British enough.
  3. Oct 8, 2019
    #3

    Ish Lights on for Luke

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    24,467
    Location:
    Where fans' expectations are too high
    Any link to the newspaper/story? I mean, we were willing to pay that for unproven Longstaff, so I don't really believe it. But who knows anymore.
  4. Oct 8, 2019
    #4

    Santos J Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    4,442
    There's 1 article from the Mirror and it says we decided against it when we decided Pogba was staying, not that we think it's too much. Not exactly 'newspapers claiming'.
  5. Oct 8, 2019
    #5

    The Boy Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    695
    Supports:
    Brighton and Hove Albion
    I wouldn't believe everything the tabloids say, I'd be amazed if you pulled out of the deal over price, more likely Utd preferred another player if they were in for him at all
  6. Oct 8, 2019
    #6

    romufc Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,935
    we probably would have paid £50m plus if he was English..
  7. Oct 8, 2019
    #7

    The Boy Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    695
    Supports:
    Brighton and Hove Albion
    Sun and Express say you pulled out over cost, but none of them can be trusted as any type of source at all.
  8. Oct 8, 2019
    #8

    mitchmouse Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,192
    surprised we haven't yet been linked to a £75m for two certain brothers... :wenger:
  9. Oct 8, 2019
    #9

    Hawks2008 Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2015
    Messages:
    3,840
    Location:
    Melbz
    Bro what the feck? This is from the same club who spent 50m on Fred, 40m on Matic, and was willing to spend similar fees on Sean Longstaff?

    Has to be rubbish, we're incompetent but not that incompetent are we?
  10. Oct 8, 2019
    #10

    Cassidy No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    18,024
    Austerity has kicked in after 6 years of reckless spending and lack of success, our net spend over the past 2 summers have been quite moderate
  11. Oct 8, 2019
    #11

    Sandikan aka sex on the beach

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    26,325
    He's no Longstaff.
  12. Oct 8, 2019
    #12

    JoaquinJoaquin Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2014
    Messages:
    7,518
    Sounds like a load of rubbish tbh. We will no doubt over spend in January anyways for whoever we go for, be it Maddison or Dembele.
  13. Oct 8, 2019
    #13

    romufc Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,935
    If Ole remains in charge, manutd will start preparing a bid in March and make a £75 bid that is rejected by Newcastle on Jult 28th.
  14. Oct 8, 2019
    #14

    SATA Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    10,184
    Location:
    We all love United
    Is he any good? Seems like people want new players every day. I remembered the Caf wanted the club to sign Mario Lemina from Soton when he was first linked. Was he even able to improve the squad? He’ll be classified a deadwood by the same time next year if he isn’t
  15. Oct 8, 2019
    #15

    The Cat Doesn't know his own mobile number

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    Messages:
    4,089
    Location:
    Fighting the good fight in South Wales.
    More likely they didn't want to spend a penny more than they did in the summer - doesn't matter what his price would have been.
  16. Oct 8, 2019
    #16

    Sjaakmeoff Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    733
    Location:
    Netherlands
    BS. Won't go for any less than 50m
  17. Oct 8, 2019
    #17

    Bwuk Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2012
    Messages:
    12,007
    Yeah. I think Madrid are after him though - highly doubt he'd come here.
  18. Oct 8, 2019
    #18

    Jacckk1985 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2018
    Messages:
    241
    Location:
    Estonia
    Don't waste your time and nerves on it. He is very bright and witty boy who just before Ajax qualified to this season CL, said that Real Madrid should leave him alone as he isn't going to consider there offer before next summer. And it was a direct quote from him, not some tabloid made - up story.

    So doesn't matter what you read now, he isn't going to go anywhere from Ajax before next summer at least. And by then his price might have doubled from now and he has a wide range to choose from.
  19. Oct 8, 2019
    #19

    Sjaakmeoff Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    733
    Location:
    Netherlands
    This.

    And you can watch him play this weeks Euro Qualifiers. At least; i think Koeman will finally use him.

    But he won't leave in the winter anyway.
  20. Oct 8, 2019
    #20

    GloryHunter07 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    11,536
    “If true” is never a good basis on which to start a thread.

    You haven't even bothered to include links in the OP.

    1/10.
  21. Oct 8, 2019
    #21

    Invictus Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018 Staff

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2014
    Messages:
    12,820
    Supports:
    Piracy on the High Seas
    He would have been a good signing for that figure, yes — would have been a good signing for even £50 million. Shouldn't be compared with Lemina, who has always underperformed despite being quite talented. Van de Beek is not the most exquisite passer from midfield, can't really dictate games yet, isn't the most athletic player, but...
    • He seems to be quite advanced in the way he interprets the game (like Thomas Müller, who wouldn't have made it at the top level without that quality).
    • A tireless worker on the pitch and reportedly a wise-head at Ajax — so he could develop into a leader at United.
    • Has a refined nose for goal from midfield (20 in just over a year) and frequently makes runs from the deep, which is a characteristic we sometimes lack.
    • Positionally versatile as a point forward or all-round central midfielder, and balances Ajax's system — e.g. last season De Jong would drop into the left half of defense to form a back-3 with Blind and De Ligt, while van de Beek and Schöne would hold fort in midfield. This term they often deploy a similar scheme depending on phase of the game, and van de Beek is crucial in 4-3-3 to 3-4-3 (or vice versa) transitions...

    Tadić
    Neres Van de Beek Ziyech
    Martínez Álvarez
    Tagliafico Blind Veltman Dest
    Onana​

    Neres Tadić Ziyech
    Tagliafico Van de Beek Álvarez Dest
    Martínez Blind Veltman
    Onana​

    • Did really well in Ajax's big games last season: scored vs. Juventus and Tottenham, and was on of the best players on the pitch vs. Madrid as a phantom second striker (setting the stage for Tadić to produce one of the best Champions League performances in recent memory).
    The current United team in short on players with his qualities, IMO, so he could have been an astute signing — though conversely, he could have found himself on the sidelines like Blind because the way we structure ourselves might not have suited his skill set, especially if there was positional overlap between him and Pogba.
  22. Oct 8, 2019
    #22

    ArjenIsM3 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2015
    Messages:
    2,611
    Location:
    Netherlands
    It's The Mirror ffs. I can quote you more reliable sources that say he'll cost over 100 million euros.
  23. Oct 8, 2019
    #23

    Sir Scott McToMinay New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2018
    Messages:
    2,739
    Location:
    Acapulco, Somalia
    Better than Maddison.
  24. Oct 8, 2019
    #24

    ivaldo Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    22,605
    Sure, sure. They valued him at £35mil in the summer but now Madrid are going to pay £100mil for him. Makes perfect sense.

    There’s some real gullible fools on this site.
  25. Oct 8, 2019
    #25

    DRM New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2017
    Messages:
    1,870
    Supports:
    SteveJ
    joke
  26. Oct 9, 2019
    #26

    BalanceUnAutreJoint New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2017
    Messages:
    515
    If we're gonna splash cash at Ajax I'd rather have Ziyech
  27. Oct 9, 2019
    #27

    redshaw Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,127
    Ed probably got suspicious of the player's quality when quoted 35 million.
  28. Oct 9, 2019
    #28

    Dante Bang Average but can post Blindfolded for 15 secs

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    16,188
    Location:
    My wit's end
    Bullshit story for gullible people to push their own agendas.
  29. Oct 9, 2019
    #29

    UNITED ACADEMY Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2018
    Messages:
    1,712
    Not a big fans of this guy. I would rather signing Bruno due to we need playmaker & creativity in the team. However, if the one who said Bruno isn't the right signing is the same person then he needs to be punch right in the stomach. And if he's the same person as the one who recommended Fred & cost us 50m then he should be sacked asap. We could be in serious mess if we keep this person.
  30. Oct 9, 2019
    #30

    KirkDuyt Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2015
    Messages:
    10,756
    Location:
    Dutchland
    Supports:
    Feyenoord
    Van de Beek would add nothing to this United side. He's benefiting immensely from the creativity he's surrounded with at Ajax.

    Still, Ajax isn't letting him go for less than 60 million, so this is definitely rubbish.
  31. Oct 9, 2019
    #31

    mitchmouse Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,192
    lucky I'm not a little schoolboy then. i you able to understand plain language: how can I give links if I can't remember where I read/heard it.
    0/10
  32. Oct 9, 2019
    #32

    GloryHunter07 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    11,536
    So touchy!
  33. Oct 9, 2019
    #33

    Rozay Master of Hindsight

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Messages:
    14,688
    Location:
    #SmallingPlusOne
    Been seeing this about for a few days. It’s obviously rubbish. If we wanted VDB, we would have paid £35m for him. We only wanted Brits, and Ajax were asking for more than that according to all reports, reports that never mentioned us and continuously linked VDB with Madrid.
  34. Oct 9, 2019
    #34

    TheReligion Abusive

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    23,464
    Location:
    Manchester
    The forum is full of whoppers at the moment. The whole 'Rashy' and we only buy English players narrative is ridiculous too. I genuinely wish the boring cnuts would leave the club and close the door behind them. Plenty of space for them at the Etihad.
  35. Oct 9, 2019
    #35

    OverratedOpinion Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2017
    Messages:
    1,413
    I doubt he's too expensive, just not very good.
  36. Oct 11, 2019
    #36

    FC Ronaldo Posts stuff that's been said before in tweet form

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Messages:
    11,860
    Totally agree.