Big Ben Foster
Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
This post implies that VAR will always result in the correct decision and will be used in a consistent manner. As we've seen, that hasn't been the case so far.
This post implies that VAR will always result in the correct decision and will be used in a consistent manner. As we've seen, that hasn't been the case so far.
It's only the correct decision because they've specifically changed the rules to accommodate the introduction of VAR. Last season that goal would have stood even if the referee saw it come off Laporte's hand as it happened.Ah of course, you don't like the correct decision?
You would of loved it if the other way round mate...think about it.
The problem with this tweet is that VAR today has literally used incorrect decisions to decide who wins the game.
And it was taken away from them. In the future people are going to be reluctant to celebrate.Your right the spurs supporters had absolutely no emotion.............
dems the rulesCorrect decisions
How was it worse for Tottenham fans?It is fecking wank.
Anything that makes the match day experience worse is a joke. It’ll be proven in the long run.
Swear it’s like the same type of people that say vaccinations don’t work all the time.This post implies that VAR will always result in the correct decision and will be used in a consistent manner. As we've seen, that hasn't been the case so far.
One is a subjective call the other is an objective call.Someone from the FA needs to come out and explain why VAR chooses to disallow a goal at one end and chooses to ignore a penalty at the other.
And I mean it NEEDS someone to explain this. Otherwise what we have now is a guy sitting in a room deciding who he wants to win the game
It's also a rule you can't grab a player in the opposition box like Lamela did to Rodri but VAR decided that didn't merit intervention. I'm not even annoyed about that because in my view it wasn't obvious enough to merit VAR overturning it but if we're going to use it for it flicking off an attacking player's hand accidentally then we can use it when a player puts his hand round an opponent and drags them back.dems the rules
The Laporte one was not a foul. He went down far too easy.I don't have a problem with the handball, but, laporte hand was pulled by the spurs player, so is that not a foul?
Spurs mate not City. Spurs fans celebrated like they had scored a goalAnd it was taken away from them. In the future people are going to be reluctant to celebrate.
Laporte didn't go down, his hand was pulled in the lead up to the goal which resulted in his arm touching the ballIt's also a rule you can't grab a player in the opposition box like Lamela did to Rodri but VAR decided that didn't merit intervention. I'm not even annoyed about that because in my view it wasn't obvious enough to merit VAR overturning it but if we're going to use it for it flicking off an attacking player's hand accidentally then we can use it when a player puts his hand round an opponent and drags them back.
The Laporte one was not a foul. He went down far too easy.
I knowIt's also a rule you can't grab a player in the opposition box like Lamela did to Rodri but VAR decided that didn't merit intervention. I'm not even annoyed about that because in my view it wasn't obvious enough to merit VAR overturning it but if we're going to use it for it flicking off an attacking player's hand accidentally then we can use it when a player puts his hand round an opponent and drags them back.
I'm more amazed VAR wasn't used for that rugby tackle in the first half tbh.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This is the issue I have, seems odd to rule a goal out for it striking the hand, when the hand is being grabbed by the opposition playerI don't have a problem with the handball, but, laporte hand was pulled by the spurs player, so is that not a foul?
Thats not really an explanation. The handball was a handball and the penalty incident was a foul. There wasn't anything subjective or objective about it. Those are the rules.One is a subjective call the other is an objective call.
It's been explained already.
I think its subjective call because you think its foul, but VAR ref didn't think it is, or at-least not enough for giving penalty.Thats not really an explanation. The handball was a handball and the penalty incident was a foul. There wasn't anything subjective or objective about it. Those are the rules.
Picking and choosing when VAR should interfere is much worse than not having it. Because of subjective VAR City will now end the season with 2 less points than they should and Spurs 1 more.
If that ends up deciding a title or champions league space you have an entire season that a ref sitting in a room has manufactured the outcome of.
The issue is that VAR isn't being asked whether it was a penalty/handball. It is being asked whether the referee made a clear and obvious mistake in not awarding the penalty/handball.Thats not really an explanation. The handball was a handball and the penalty incident was a foul. There wasn't anything subjective or objective about it. Those are the rules.
Picking and choosing when VAR should interfere is much worse than not having it. Because of subjective VAR City will now end the season with 2 less points than they should and Spurs 1 more.
If that ends up deciding a title or champions league space you have an entire season that a ref sitting in a room has manufactured the outcome of.
Ah right, sorry thought you were on about when he hand his hand held and threw himself down. Yeah, makes it even more frustrating.Laporte didn't go down, his hand was pulled in the lead up to the goal which resulted in his arm touching the ball
That's literally not how VAR works.One is a fact. It hit his hand, that's not allowed, the goal is not given.
One is opinion. The referee has seen it and in his opinion, it's not a penalty. VAR can't determine that it was a clear and obvious error by the referee because he's seen it, it's his opinion so they don't overrule.
Every team will have decisions to contend with over the season and it'll become an accepted part of the game
I totally get where you're coming from, and I have sympathy for your view. But I think if you take all football watchers as a whole with their opinions evened out over a season, VAR will come out as a positive.That’s just it, I enjoyed the 0 second wait to burst into celebration. Not having to wait 15+ seconds to celebrate. Just different opinions and different outlook on the game I guess
It is a subjective call. That sort of physicality on the box at set pieces happens in every game across the country. Refs are often a bit lenient with them. Otherwise there would be penalties every match from holding in the box.I agree want Gary Neville said in the post match, city should not feel injustice about the goal. However harsh it may be, VAR did the right thing in getting the right call.
But they have every right to be pissed off at the penalty call. I mean if a professional ref looks at that and thinks it’s not a foul, I am sorry, no amount of tech would improve the game.
And people on here defend that it was somehow a subjective call, seriously??
It is harsh but I think I like the new rule. It takes out any ambiguity.Just watched the VAR decision for that disallowed City goal. Seems incredibly harsh, and I'm saying that as a United fan and as someone who has always wanted video refereeing in some format.
It would be for a few weeks, then defenders would stop cheating once they know they can't get away with it anymore.Otherwise there would be penalties every match from holding in the box.
I agree but it's one of those things that has had such a weird middle ground that I believe refs have just agreed to let them go a bit.It would be for a few weeks, then defenders would stop cheating once they know they can't get away with it anymore.