Cloudface
Full Member
I couldn't believe that, it wasn't like it was hard to figure out it was happening by the time the whistle went either.Not allowing the advantage when Garnacho was played in was inexcusable.
I couldn't believe that, it wasn't like it was hard to figure out it was happening by the time the whistle went either.Not allowing the advantage when Garnacho was played in was inexcusable.
Plus Indirect Free Kicks in the box are one of the best things in football
Ronaldo against Aston Villa like 08/09 no?Has anyone actually ever scored from indirect free kick? It seems like a pretty stupid punishment when the probability of scoring from it is really low.
Has anyone actually ever scored from indirect free kick? It seems like a pretty stupid punishment when the probability of scoring from it is really low.
Fully agree. Would love to see this happen. Getting an easy goal when there was realistically no chance of getting one from the foul (in this case Bruno's handball) is just absolute nonsense. The spurs handball in the CL final against Liverpool is probably the most outrageous one that springs to mind. Set the tempo and ruined the whole game. Football is supposed to be a game of outperforming your opponent, and such easy goals take it away.I've been banging the drum for non-deliberate handball being an indirect free kick inside the box. It's a more than justified reward for what the majority of handballs actually are.
I forgot about that. What the hell was he thinking? Of course it took him only 1 second of looking at VAR screen to decide it was penalty. But giving advantage when it's clear United players have kept possession seems too complicated.Not allowing the advantage when Garnacho was played in was inexcusable.
Madness. Commentators thought bruno wanted denial goalscoring opp but he wanted the advantageNot allowing the advantage when Garnacho was played in was inexcusable.
Ronaldo against Aston Villa like 08/09 no?
Ronaldo scored one for us
Good shout!
So one every 15 years![]()
Has anyone actually ever scored from indirect free kick? It seems like a pretty stupid punishment when the probability of scoring from it is really low.
They are great entertainment though, the pure panic caused is quite funny.
Brute force seems to be the best way to score.
To be fair that's probably the last time we had one! They're very rarely given
I did at five-a-side a few weeks agoHas anyone actually ever scored from indirect free kick? It seems like a pretty stupid punishment when the probability of scoring from it is really low.
Is it an advantage when garnacho has it? Dumb clown just boot it either at the near post or over the bar.Not allowing the advantage when Garnacho was played in was inexcusable.
They are very rare, used to be fairly common in the 90s just after the backpass rule was introduced. And in all honesty they were great spectacles. Defending teams all lined up on the goal line, the inevitable goalmouth scramble.Good shout!
So one every 15 years![]()
Bayern actually won a league title with one:Has anyone actually ever scored from indirect free kick? It seems like a pretty stupid punishment when the probability of scoring from it is really low.
Thought the Bruno handball penalty was ridiculous. He jumped and the ball was hit at him from about a yard away.
I don't know if refs are just stupid or if they're trying to follow the rule. There was no attempt to use his hand and no advantage gained by it hitting his hand. Why is that worth a penalty
More like centimetres away and about to hit the ball even without the opponent heading it:Thought the Bruno handball penalty was ridiculous. He jumped and the ball was hit at him from about a yard away.
I don't know if refs are just stupid or if they're trying to follow the rule. There was no attempt to use his hand and no advantage gained by it hitting his hand. Why is that worth a penalty
It's a clear penalty. Like you said why the hell is his hand even in that position? It's so stupid and cost us the win. But his stans will absolve him of all the blame yet again.More like centimetres away and about to hit the ball even without the opponent heading it:
![]()
But unlike you, I think that was a correct penalty to give. It's an idiotic movement and his hand has absolutely no business being where it is. You just can't jump like that, block the ball, and expect to not have it be a penalty.
And "no advantage gained by it hitting his hand"? He blocked the opponent's header towards the goal, how is that not an advantage?
It's a clear penalty. Like you said why the hell is his hand even in that position? It's so stupid and cost us the win. But his stans will absolve him of all the blame yet again.
Watching the Celta vs Leganes game and Celta have just had a ridiculously tight offside ruled out. Looked level on the replay but Var found a fraction of Duran's head 'offside'.
For me it is penalising good attacking play on the shoulder of last defender.
As I said in the match day thread, this sort of controversy around anything United drives clicks for them.If we see this out, will the talking points in the media for the next week be that Anthony Taylor helped us by putting the defensive wall at 11.2 yards (according to Sky Sports) instead of 10 yards?
Neville kept repeating this a few times as a "fun fact" without directly placing blame. Just making sure everyone became aware that the ball might not have gone over the wall if it stood a little closer to the spot.
I don't remember seeing anyone calculating this distance during a match for any other club in the past.
Exactly, has this tv graphic showing the exact wall distance always been a thing or just because it was United that scored? Can’t say I have ever seen it before and always thought it was a given that the wall will never be precisely 10 yards out considering the ref walks it out for Christ sake.If we see this out, will the talking points in the media for the next week be that Anthony Taylor helped us by putting the defensive wall at 11.2 yards (according to Sky Sports) instead of 10 yards?
Neville kept repeating this a few times as a "fun fact" without directly placing blame. Just making sure everyone became aware that the ball might not have gone over the wall if it stood a little closer to the spot.
I don't remember seeing anyone calculating this distance during a match for any other club in the past.
There will be a campaign to shorten Anthony Taylor's legsExactly, has this tv graphic showing the exact wall distance always been a thing or just because it was United that scored? Can’t say I have ever seen it before and always thought it was a given that the wall will never be precisely 10 yards out considering the ref walks it out for Christ sake.
Didn’t Villa score against us at Villa Park a few seasons back when the United wall was about 15 yards back from the ball? Hilarious, I believe, was the common opinion at the time.
Wait and see the difference in reaction to today’s minimal advantage…
It was checked and clearedI wonder if the "handball" by Heaven a minute or so before Arsenals goal would have been given if Rice hadn't scored? The ball had not gone dead between the 2 incidents.....