He's basically hulk.Well, at least we know why he isn't physical.
If he imposes himself, he gets close to committing manslaughter.
Makes me wonder what sort of dark past he's hiding.Well, at least we know why he isn't physical.
If he imposes himself, he gets close to committing manslaughter.
If he's not getting the ball he needs to make sure he's not kneeing someone standing upright in the face!I'm trying to think what he can do there
I mean the opponent is basically a statue and doesn't jump (don't even think he's looking)
Lindelof should jump lower?
He was fine but here's a reason I have found to criticize him.Played fine, obvious foul on the "goal" and made a nice clearance at one point. But what was funny about it was it was the exact scenario that posters often talk about when someone makes a slidetackle, he played his man onside then cleared the ball with a slide tackle very well. But if he had just not stepped back he wouldnt have played the attacker onside and needed to make the tackle. Just thought that it was funny because its usually something levelled at players who are aggressive and make lots of slide tackles. It was a popular thing to say about Carragher on here, and people say it about AWB too. But in this very clear case its an unagressive CB who doesnt make many slide tackles, making one because he got his position wrong. Thought he was fine in the air too. Overall good game
Jump normally with both legs under him, then the contact is body to body and the only risk is elbowing or clashing heads which remember is still a foul. Or time his jump correctly and touch the ballI'm trying to think what he can do there
I mean the opponent is basically a statue and doesn't jump (don't even think he's looking)
Lindelof should jump lower?
Well, he saves old ladies from muggers too, soooo, Batman??Makes me wonder what sort of dark past he's hiding.
I get that, but lindelof is clearly going for the ball. Maybe I need to see it again, but it's not like he goes to kick the guy. If the other guy is ball watching and goes to attack the ball too, it wouldn't have happenedIf he's not getting the ball he needs to make sure he's not kneeing someone standing upright in the face!
If he doesnt jump it happens. And Lindelof didnt make it to the ball so how can it be that he had to jump? The defender was right not to jump, they werent reaching it.I get that, but lindelof is clearly going for the ball. Maybe I need to see it again, but it's not like he goes to kick the guy. If the other guy is ball watching and goes to attack the ball too, it wouldn't have happened
It was bizarre
A level of care needs to be applied I would say.I get that, but lindelof is clearly going for the ball. Maybe I need to see it again, but it's not like he goes to kick the guy. If the other guy is ball watching and goes to attack the ball too, it wouldn't have happened
It was bizarre
You mean people should only jump if they are 100% sure they are winning the ball? What?If he doesnt jump it happens. And Lindelof didnt make it to the ball so how can it be that he had to jump? The defender was right not to jump, they werent reaching it.
Now if Lindelof gets the ball then yeah the defender should have jumped. He couldnt get there
Yeah I definitely need to see it again. It was really unusual as it looks like a clear foul and I get why he was booked, but it was odd as the defender isn't even looking (or so I thought)A level of care needs to be applied I would say.
Just as Lindelöf has every right to attempt to head the ball, the defender has just as much right to not head the ball and not got kneed in the head.
I'd say the fact that this is such an unusual incident probably would suggest that players aren't commonly jumping like that for the ball.
So you think people should slide tackle when they arent going to get the ball and if they make contact with the player and not the ball, its not a foul?You mean people should only jump if they are 100% sure they are winning the ball? What?
Okay I get it, you don't like any player that doesnt play for United and want our players to hurt themOk I get it, you don't like lindelof
That's totally unfair. Just because an action hurts a player doesn't mean its a foul. Sometimes when someone's going for the ball and the defender is just standing there nonplussed they can sometimes take a collision.Okay I get it, you don't like any player that doesnt play for United and want our players to hurt them
By jumping, Lindelof causes a distraction. He’s absolutely roght to jump there. The defender is completely unaware of his surroundings. To think someone would jump for a corner. Madness!If he doesnt jump it happens. And Lindelof didnt make it to the ball so how can it be that he had to jump? The defender was right not to jump, they werent reaching it.
Now if Lindelof gets the ball then yeah the defender should have jumped. He couldnt get there
As per thisThat's totally unfair. Just because an action hurts a player doesn't mean its a foul. Sometimes when someone's going for the ball and the defender is just standing there nonplussed they can sometimes take a collision.
It's not a surprise nowHe was fine but here's a reason I have found to criticize him.
The post was about the poster not about Lindelof. Lindelof isnt trying to hurt the defender thats for sure, but he easily could have done. One of the most effective strikes in MMA is a jumping knee strike, which is what Lindelof caught him with.That's totally unfair. Just because an action hurts a player doesn't mean its a foul. Sometimes when someone's going for the ball and the defender is just standing there nonplussed they can sometimes take a collision.
I dont know if you've ever seen a distraction before, but its never a jumping knee into someone's face. That isnt a distraction, thats assaultBy jumping, Lindelof causes a distraction. He’s absolutely roght to jump there. The defender is completely unaware of his surroundings. To think someone would jump for a corner. Madness!
I commented in the Bailly thread that it looked like Bailly enjoyed playing with Lindelof and vice versa, and Ekeke quoted me to effectively disagree with the first part. Unreal.As per this
It's not a surprise now
Have you seen someone jump before? Their knees tend to follow into the air.I dont know if you've ever seen a distraction before, but its never a jumping knee into someone's face. That isnt a distraction, thats assault
You clearly havent if you think thats how people normally jump for a header at a corner.Have you seen someone jump before? Their knees tend to follow into the air.
He's on a mission to downplay lindelof because he took smallings placeI commented in the Bailly thread that it looked like Bailly enjoyed playing with Lindelof and vice versa, and Ekeke quoted me to effectively disagree with the first part. Unreal.
Do you seriously not lift your knees if you are going for as much height as possible? It’s not uncommon, mate. Walking around inside your own penalty box completely unaware of what is going on, or that a football match is being played, is more of a concern as to what is normal. Jumping at the first post for a corner is normal even if you don’t win it, and raising your knees to gain more height is also normal. Try it, albeit not in my face.You clearly havent if you think thats how people normally jump for a header at a corner.