TrustInJanuzaj
'Liverpool are a proper club'
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 11,293
Yeh PL proven to be nowhere near good enough which a good portion of Utd fans said before he ever arrived.Lukaku was PL proven when we signed him
Yeh PL proven to be nowhere near good enough which a good portion of Utd fans said before he ever arrived.Lukaku was PL proven when we signed him
Wrong info and linking buying a striker to us spending on a much needed defender? Huh? Talk about whinging for whingings sake.
I thought he cost Napoli 80m?
They've spent 75 Mil Euro on him
They bought him for 80m, and he's not the same player as he was two years ago. He's been allowed to develop his game peacefully, which the caf would never have let him. He'd be hated by now if we'd bought him two years ago.
Alright I meant Lille for fecks sake. I did say two years ago.Get your facts right.
I don’t think any club is interested in him for that reason.Why would any club want to spend any money on him if he's going to miss 6 months?
Alright I meant Lille for fecks sake. I did say two years ago.
Gamble is that Osimhen almost guarantees them competitiveness next season and chance for 2nd title, then, even with 1 year left, if he's hit similar figures they can pit bidders against each other and get a 9 figure sum. Probability is still that at least 2 of the big sides will be chasing a striker next season. Plus, for better or worse, Napoli's sale strategy seems to be a little like Levy's where they'd rather risk losing more down the line than be exposed as a weak seller when they still have leverage and have this affect prices they can ask in the future.He can plan however he wants, there is only one way this is going, the player leaving. He has only 2 years left and the player wants to play in PL. Next year with one year let in his contract he will have to sell him for fractions of his value now.
We will be interested in him next summer too. Even if we get Harry Kane, he isn't gonna get younger.Wonder how much he'll actually push to move this summer? Coming off that title win and adored by the Napoli fans, waiting around for another year is hardly the end of the world from his POV. Also wonder who might be interested next summer?
That's actually:
- 13 goals for Lille in 24 games in his first season
- 10 goals for Napoli in 27 games in his first season
You're saying the CAF would hate a 22/23 year old scoring a goal every two games in his first season in a new league? You only have to look at Martial to see how much grace is extended to young, promising players. Anthony is obviously nowhere near as productive.
Keeping Osimhen means they will likely win the Serie A and go fairly deep in the CL again next season, and you're overstating it when saying a 'fraction' of his value. Napoli also have history of keeping the players they want to keep unless they are offered truly huge amounts of money. Osimhen is young enough and they had enough success this season that he probably won't push too hard to leave right now either.He can plan however he wants, there is only one way this is going, the player leaving. He has only 2 years left and the player wants to play in PL. Next year with one year let in his contract he will have to sell him for fractions of his value now.
Then we pursue him again next summer and the CAF will scream out "1-season-wonder"Also if Napoli have a disasterous defence of the title or players get complacent, his value could come down. Especially if he doesnt hit the heights of this season.
We will be interested in him next summer too. Even if we get Harry Kane, he isn't gonna get younger.
We wont get him or Kane if we blow CL qualification and hand it to liverpool which we seem i tend on doing. Sigh.
I'm not sure a lot of people in this thread know that Napoli's president makes Levy look like an amateur in comparison, notoriously horrendous to deal with.
I don't think this was ever on, nevermind off. Certainly not for 150 million that they seemingly demand.
It'll be Kane, Ramos or a cheaper option is my guess.
There's a strong possibility that Haaland might be the greatest goal scorer most of us will ever see. He's a freak. Hojlund is not going to get as many goals as Haaland (and that's not a knock on him).But he’s not in as good an attack as Haaland, not getting as many big chances
Not sure why we're debating numbers he put up when he was 21. He's clearly kicked on proving with the comparison to Martial that development is not necessarily linear. Among the top five leagues, he's only 2nd to Haaland in goals per 90 (Osimhen doesn't take pens), third in shots/90 and is obviously excellent in the air which would benefit us in setpieces too.Lukaku scored a goal every two games for us, and I'd say he was disliked.
And yes, scoring 10 goals over 27 matches is far from impressive. That's the kind of numbers we expect from a striker if we're aiming to be top 6. Besides, those were his numbers from much weaker leagues, and he would likely find it harder to score in the PL.
Martial was one of the biggest talents around at the time we signed him with exceptional technique, dribbling and close control. He scored a fantastic goal in his debut against Liverpool at the age of 19. He was a much bigger talent than Osimhen and more naturally gifted, but his attitude and mentality has let him down.
Lukaku scored a goal every two games for us, and I'd say he was disliked.
How old and established was Lukaku when he did that?
I agree with Kvaradona but Green**** and Martial???I would prefer Kvaradona and keep Rashford and Martial as strikers.
Maybe Greenwood also but I'm not sure he'll be back.
I really hope he doesn't end up at another PL team. I'd be disappointed enough if we decided to opt for Kane over him as is, let alone with the risk of having to watch them both in the same league. If not us then let him go to PSG or Bayern.
I really hope he doesn't end up at another PL team. I'd be disappointed enough if we decided to opt for Kane over him as is, let alone with the risk of having to watch them both in the same league. If not us then let him go to PSG or Bayern.
Maybe Erik wants more of a striker who will get involved in the buildup too. I am not saying that's the right way of thinking but just looks that way
They don't have a proper striker in their squad, so buying an elite one isn't silly "spending" - if they buy 2 more 100m guys in the midfield then it's silly.I remember a few Chelsea fans on here saying there wouldn't be anymore silly spending from them in the summer?
As well as Lukaku returning.isn't Nkunku coming in?