I’m not the expert but according to this post (link below) We are allowed to have net spend 21.6m annual in transfer window (the post said 21m) to avoid FFP for 23/24 season. That’s equivalent to 55m transfer fees and 200k pw wages. 55m transfer fees is pretty much 11m per year in 5 years contract/amortis, while 200k pw wages is equivalent to 10.4m per year. 11m+10.4m = 21.4m (That’s where I get the numbers 55m transfer fees and 200k pw wages).
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/a-l...ir-play-rules-on-man-utd.474688/post-29977585
But the poster also mentioned that we can do the followings:
Harry Magure -- Sold for 25m
Dean Henderson -- Sold for 20m
Donny van de Beek -- Sold for 12m
Aaron Wan-Bissaka -- Sold for 10m
Fred -- Sold for 7.5m
Pellestri -- Sold for 5m
We can sign expensive striker, expensive midfielder, two cheap players. So signing Osimhen is very possible.
Another alternative (shown in the same post) is that the new owner has to pay off our 680m debt (caused by glazers), then we can spend almost double of 55m transfer fees and double of 200k pw wages. Which allows us to sign Osimhen for more than 100m and free Tielemans. I suppose the new owner can force Glazers to pay off the debt before they can agree to buy. I mean who wants to pay 6 billions on something that has 700m debt?
IMO, we can sign expensive striker like Osimhen, but get tielemans for free to rotate with eriksen, sell McTominay and VDB to buy casemiro’s backup, sell Dean to buy David raya.