Ali Dia
Full Member
They are all absolute bastardsOur last great team had Ronaldo, Rooney, Giggs and Tevez.
Winners aren't usually nice guys.
They are all absolute bastardsOur last great team had Ronaldo, Rooney, Giggs and Tevez.
Winners aren't usually nice guys.
Nah Tevez and Ronaldo has the same personality as Vinicius the difference is both dealing with Ferguson and Vinicius is alonsoGreat. Their personality is night and day different from his.
Would definitely take him for up to max 400k a week. He's that good. And unfortunately we have very little pull to sign world class forwards, unless we develop them ourselves.
They can afford to cos everyone "has dreams of playing for them". To the extent some would run down their contracts to join on a free so in quite a few cases there's no transfer fee even involved hence the large wagesUnfortunately I think he can hold for more than that, maybe 450-500 range. Don’t Real pay some super high wages?
Some on here live in cloud cuckoo land. Not in touch with reality. More in touch with Football Manager and FIFA.What does it take for some of you guys to recognise that we are no longer paying galactico wages? 400k or more per week is just not happening. Why do you think that INEOS preference is to get Rashford off the books? All we’ve heard since INEOS came in is about the need to reduce salaries. They wanted rid of Casemiro, Rashford, etc since day one
Realistically this is what happensIf we could afford, it’s an obvious yes. On his day he’s one of the best in the world.
Vini would link up so well with Sesko.
Wages - meh. If it’s 400k a week like some players have stated, fine by me. We paid Casemiro not that far off that, Mount, Rashford etc. Vini is streets ahead of Mount or Rashford.
Zero chance this happens. I imagine he does another season at Madrid, falls out with Jose then goes Saudi for silly wages.
Getting wages under control and only paying what players 'deserve' is different than having a hard limit and never paying big wages to anyone. We don't really know for sure which one of those are true yet, and won't until we have a player (either bought or developed) who is worth paying those kinds of wages. The likes of Casemiro and Rashford are clearly massively overpaid considering what they bring on the field so aren't really a relevant comparison.What does it take for some of you guys to recognise that we are no longer paying galactico wages? 400k or more per week is just not happening. Why do you think that INEOS preference is to get Rashford off the books? All we’ve heard since INEOS came in is about the need to reduce salaries. They wanted rid of Casemiro, Rashford, etc since day one
Fairly obvious that’s what we’re doingGetting wages under control and only paying what players 'deserve' is different than having a hard limit and never paying big wages to anyone. We don't really know for sure which one of those are true yet, and won't until we have a player (either bought or developed) who is worth paying those kinds of wages. The likes of Casemiro and Rashford are clearly massively overpaid considering what they bring on the field so aren't really a relevant comparison.
Getting wages under control and only paying what players 'deserve' is different than having a hard limit and never paying big wages to anyone. We don't really know for sure which one of those are true yet, and won't until we have a player (either bought or developed) who is worth paying those kinds of wages. The likes of Casemiro and Rashford are clearly massively overpaid considering what they bring on the field so aren't really a relevant comparison.
In saying that, I think we're focusing on getting a solid baseline throughout the entire team before we even think about putting the final touches on it with someone on huge wages like Vinicius.
In saying that, I think we're focusing on getting a solid baseline throughout the entire team before we even think about putting the final touches on it with someone on huge wages like Vinicius.
What happens then in your example with Vini coming in on 400k a week, when Utd approach players for contract extensions? Your wage bill skyrockets. You have less money in the transfer market as it's going on ridiculous wages.Getting wages under control and only paying what players 'deserve' is different than having a hard limit and never paying big wages to anyone. We don't really know for sure which one of those are true yet, and won't until we have a player (either bought or developed) who is worth paying those kinds of wages. The likes of Casemiro and Rashford are clearly massively overpaid considering what they bring on the field so aren't really a relevant comparison.
In saying that, I think we're focusing on getting a solid baseline throughout the entire team before we even think about putting the final touches on it with someone on huge wages like Vinicius.
Saka is currently their highest paid player on €350kWould Arsenal drop 500k a week on him?
It would mean they’d have to pay more internally but maybe they need to do that as championsSaka is currently their highest paid player on €350k
Vinicius is reportedly on 130k more, would definitely be a big change in their structure but that level of quality is worth it in my eyes.
For that caliber/profile of player, you pretty much have to pay up.
feck me, I'd use the 3rd midfielder money and whatever's left over on him if he's actually available
feck me, I'd use the 3rd midfielder money and whatever's left over on him if he's actually available
Nonsense.If we were a serious club we would be in for him.
Not nonsense and we likely areNonsense.
There’s no world in which we can afford him.If we were a serious club we would be in for him.
As much as I hat to admit it, I think they're a CL winning side with himBloody hell that would he a genuine statement signing. He fills one of the only positional weaknesses they have and its fecking Vini.
Vini is going to be on £400-500k a week. Way, WAY higher than this current ownership would go. Zero chance we would’ve gone for him.Chelsea crying they wasted £117m when they could have had him instead.
Yeah right, we have spent net 40m and cleared the wage bill. We can absolutely afford itThere’s no world in which we can afford him.
No transfer will have aged faster than that one if Arsenal manage to sign fecking Vini for lessChelsea crying they wasted £117m when they could have had him instead.

It's not affordability that is the issue, it's prudence.There’s no world in which we can afford him.
Tbf, with their signings last summer everyone thought Liverpool would win the title at a canter. They would obviously be an incredibly strong unit, but it’s not always that cut and dry.If genuine, Arsenal are after: Vinicius and Bruno G.
They get both and it’s a very different team. Miles ahead as favourites for the league.
How much is Rogers on?Vini is going to be on £400-500k a week. Way, WAY higher than this current ownership would go. Zero chance we would’ve gone for him.
Now, if Roman was still the owner…