Was Ole a coward?

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,368
It would have been interesting to see what he’d have done if the Liverpool and Leicester fixtures were reversed. But honestly, I don’t see what choice he had.
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,463
Not sure how it would be considered cowardly. Surely brave, if anything, to risk vilification of media, fans, journos and sanctions from the FA by playing a B team. Definitely the right thing to do (even though resting Henderson absolutely f****d my FF team).
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
6,668
Would Sir Alex done the same, United have blown 2 league titles with a 5 point gap and 3 to play. A long shot for Ole to catch City but stranger things have happened...
Wondered this too. I can’t imagine him gifting the title to City.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,345
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
I never expected to play a first-team in 3 but to stick 2 youngsters up top and a pity much-unused midfield 3 surely was just giving up on the game and whatever little chance to catch City.
What team would you have put out if you were Ole?
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,161
I never expected to play a first-team in 3 but to stick 2 youngsters up top and a pity much-unused midfield 3 surely was just giving up on the game and whatever little chance to catch City.
Who else could they have played without doubling up? Pogba and Rashford are both needed against Liverpool so it’s ridiculous to start them.

He brought on the big guns in the second half, genuinely don’t know what else we can expect.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,384
This fecking forum.

If he didnt do what he did, we would have a thread "ole doesnt understand Manchester United'
'We were never going to win the title anyway so why burn out our players needlessly'

And tbh, we were 1-1 at the point he made changes to win the game with Rashford and cavani coming on.
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,556
Ole did the right thing for the first XI players who were placed in an unhealthy situation with 3 full games in 5 days. He made that choice with the Europa League final on the fast approaching horizon and with top 4 more than already secure.

While doing this he ruined Liverpool’s chances of making the Champions League next year and helped to further cement their rough situation.

The trade off was a plastic proxy club for oil money won the league without anyone having to see them do it and none of their 17 fans able to celebrate? I’ll take that 11 times out of 10.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,161
I would stick Rashford on the Left, Pogba instead of Mata that's all not the entire first team, we had no options at the full-backs and Centre halves.
The same Rashford who has been playing with injuries and the same Pogba who has been fairly injury prone the last year or so?

Would you also play those 2 v Liverpool?
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,505
Presuming this is a thread isn't a wind-up then no, definitely not. His job is to do the best for his team and the club, he had to change things given we have 3 games in 5 days to try and ensure that the teams picked for all 3 games had some level of energy and to mitigate the risk of injury (there was never any chance of the league and top 4 is secured while we do have a Europa League final to worry about) and given that the middle game of the 3 is the obvious one in which to make changes.

Now it's perfectly reasonable to discuss why our options are so limited given the money spent on this squad, albeit that's much more a question for other people at the club than the manager, and there have also been times when Ole's use of his squad hasn't been perfect, there have probably been games where he could have brought in a few at a time to keep them sharp and to give key players a break, but I don't think any such criticism can be thrown at him for last night and to accuse him of being cowardly would be incredibly unfair.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,345
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
I can only refer to SAF when he was in a similar situation on some occasions. He wouldn't hesitate critizising the system (FA). Not only in this type of situation but also how the FA didn't help English club when they had important games in Europe. I can't remember if Sir Alex's team selections were maybe someone with a better call than me can remember.
Not necessarily a similar situation but I will always remember your 8-2 win over the arse for the weak squad you fielded...

DeGea
Smalling Jones Evans Evra
Nani Cleverly Anderson Young
Rooney Welbeck
The squad you could have played

DeGea
Raphael Ferdinand Vidic Evra
Nani Carrick Scholes Giggs
Rooney Berbatov​
Subs: Owen, Park, Hernandez, Fletcher to name just a few!
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
So this is Elvis' burner account.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,649
Location
The Mathews Bridge
You can't play a strongest 11 over 3 games in 5 days. Not wise when part of the focus is going to be the upcoming cup final.

Ole did the right thing. A heavily rotated team of squad players did well against a team 3rd in the league, that is relatively pleasing. I'd rather our best team go up against Liverpool. A win tomorrow pretty much secures 2nd (unless Chelsea can pull the GD back) and probably stops Liverpool finishing top 4.
 

The White Pele

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
4,947
I actually think the approach he has taken probably gave us the best chance of winning all 3.

He obviously couldn’t go full strength (or minor rotation) in all 3 games as the intensity would massively suffer.

If he had heavily rotated for Villa and gone full strength vs Leicester then we would be heavily rotating again for Liverpool.

If he had played a hybrid of starters and backup players in all 3 games it might have worked, but equally there’s a reasonable chance that we lose the Villa game and then the pressure is massively on getting a result vs Leicester or Liverpool with a less than full strength team.

What Ole did was absolutely the right thing. Play as strong an XI as possible in the first game to secure our CL finish, fully rotate for Leicester which was arguably the easiest game on paper with their form and potentially one eye on the cup final, and then back to as strong as possible for Liverpool.

I would stand by this not only being the safest approach to secure our CL finish but also being our best chance of getting the maximum 9 points.

We had to roll the dice against Leicester to have any chance of winning all 3 and with the game at 1-1 at half time with plenty of firepower to come off the bench, I don’t think Ole was that far from pulling it off.
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
6,668
Hardly gifting, they had one hand and 4 fingers on the cup. As great as SAF was, I think he would have done the same and gone in on the likes of the FA.
It couldn’t have been more gifted if we‘d wrapped it in ribbons. Leicester were there for the taking, think SAF would have made a few changes, enough to win the game then took them off.
 

SuperiorXI

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
14,567
Location
Manchester, England
It couldn’t have been more gifted if we‘d wrapped it in ribbons. Leicester were there for the taking, think SAF would have made a few changes, enough to win the game then took them off.
Nonsense, they were 10 points ahead with 4 games to go, did you really think they would lose 3 games against the likes of Newcastle, Brighton and Everton?
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
86,393
Nope. Weird thread. They were winning it regardless.

If you don't think they were able to get 3 more points by the end of the season then I'm not sure what to suggest.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,161
It couldn’t have been more gifted if we‘d wrapped it in ribbons. Leicester were there for the taking, think SAF would have made a few changes, enough to win the game then took them off.
:lol: hilarious, the lack of respect for Leicester is hilarious and City won’t lose the next 3 games.
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
6,668
Nonsense, they were 10 points ahead with 4 games to go, did you really think they would lose 3 games against the likes of Newcastle, Brighton and Everton?
You don’t get it do you ...we’re talking about Fergie here, we all know City just needed a couple of points, but SAF would have made them go and get them.

Why would SAF give City an easy ride before the CL final?
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,759
I never expected to play a first-team in 3 but to stick 2 youngsters up top and a pity much-unused midfield 3 surely was just giving up on the game and whatever little chance to catch City.
& yet we still only lost 2-1. Not like it was a battering
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,766
Seems a little Long-winded thanks for the English lesson but you actually failed to answer the question so was he a coward?
No he fecking wasn’t you fool. He rotated his squad so the other half of the pathetic moan about anything United fans were not crying about potential or possible injuries by playing players into the ground 3 times in five days.

I can’t believe I and others have even bothered replying, it just beggars belief what I see on here sometimes
 

RedBanker

I love you Ole
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
2,653
OGS was helpless. He had to rotate. If you want to vent do it on the people who disrupted the Liverpool match at OT. Without that our schedule would not have been so punishing.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,005
Noooooo, he should have played the best 11, meaning they were absolutely clapped out against Liverpool, meaning we lose to them, potentially get players injured for the cup final, and even more clown threads on here.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,161
No he fecking wasn’t you fool. He rotated his squad so the other half of the pathetic moan about anything United fans were not crying about potential or possible injuries by playing players into the ground 3 times in five days.

I can’t believe I and others have even bothered replying, it just beggars belief what I see on here sometimes
Spot on :lol: I genuinely don’t understand how this has to be explained to people.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
100,976
Location
Barrow In Furness
It would have been interesting to see what he’d have done if the Liverpool and Leicester fixtures were reversed. But honestly, I don’t see what choice he had.
If Leicester had to play on the Thursday there would have been uproar and they would have rested their whole team. Two days before a cup final.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,314
Would Sir Alex done the same, United have blown 2 league titles with a 5 point gap and 3 to play. A long shot for Ole to catch City but stranger things have happened...
I'm not sure stranger things have happened. Not when you take into accpunt the quality of the team we're chasing.

Obviously not a coward and really this word, connected to Ole, is banded around far too much.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,716
Location
Rectum
He fielded a team he thought would be more than enough for this out of form Leicester team.
Liverpool getting fecked in the progress was an added extra sweetness.