Volumiza
The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
What are your thoughts?Handing City the title without them even playing, your thoughts?
What are your thoughts?Handing City the title without them even playing, your thoughts?
Or just 2 draws.City needed 1 win from 3 games against Newcastle, Burnley and Everton. It was a matter of time.
When was this? And what stranger things have happened?Would Sir Alex done the same, United have blown 2 league titles with a 5 point gap and 3 to play. A long shot for Ole to catch City but stranger things have happened...
Did the team have to play 5 games in 12 days when that happened?Would Sir Alex done the same, United have blown 2 league titles with a 5 point gap and 3 to play. A long shot for Ole to catch City but stranger things have happened...
Can you and those other cretins -those claiming Ole was a coward for not giving Amad, Van de Beek, Tuanzebe, Williams etc playing time - can you go into a small chatroom and slug it out among yourselves as to why Ole is a coward? Now, that would be the daring thing to do!Handing City the title without them even playing, your thoughts?
Why would his decision lead to him being a coward anyway? What the feck has being a coward got to to with team choice?Why is it a shit thread because I asked an opinion on do people think Ole was a coward - most seem to think he made the right choice. Some don't it's only a question you don't have to reply to. It's a football page after all people have different opinions and like to bounce them of each other.
Not to me he's not.Was? He's still alive.
Spot the feck on.Nothing to do with cowardice.
Ole did what other managers in his position would do, he could however have been a bit more succinct in 'rotating his players' as he still finished up risking injury to some obvious first choice players. Last night we could still have lost and incurred injuries, to key players, then the question would be about his judgement.
Handing City the title without them even playing, your thoughts?
I think he still wanted to win/draw the game that's why he made those subs. You can argue that it wasn't the smartest thing to do with a final coming up. But I really don't think he wanted to hand it to City. I think he's grown bigger balls the longer he's been here tbh.Nothing to do with cowardice.
Ole did what other managers in his position would do, he could however have been a bit more succinct in 'rotating his players' as he still finished up risking injury to some obvious first choice players. Last night we could still have lost and incurred injuries, to key players, then the question would be about his judgement.
And if we aren't leading at half time? There's only 3 subs.I don't think Ole plays that line up if fans are in the stadium.
I think Ole got lost trying to prove a point to the FA over the fixture pile up.
I think Ole could have started s stronger team and if we lead at half time then make all the subs.
I'm a big fan of Ole but was disappointed yesterday
The lack of effort by these wums nowadays is humorous though.Clearly a wum thread, but i'll bite.
We were put into an impossible situation.
With everything on the line, you'd be daft not to take the Leicester game more easily, and be fresh for Liverpool.
If it just so happens that it helps Leicester get the top 4, and Liverpool don't... well that's hard luck.
But it was a tight game, we only lost due to a set piece. Might have gone the other way too - it’s not like Leicester had significant advantage or many chancesHanding City the title without them even playing, your thoughts?
Agree end ofNo, did the right thing. Next?
United could have started lineups similar to this. Made the subs at half time against leicester as required.And if we aren't leading at half time? There's only 3 subs.
If we play a strong team yesterday we have to play a weak team tomorrow against Liverpool. There's simply no chance we could play 3 strong teams Sunday Tuesday Thursday.
It would have been absolutely mental by Ole. I thought bringing on Cavani, Rashford and Bruno yesterday was a bit silly to be honest.