spaceboyRSA
Full Member
YesIt was interesting. Am I supposed to not have a clue what the feck is going on?
YesIt was interesting. Am I supposed to not have a clue what the feck is going on?
It was interesting. Am I supposed to not have a clue what the feck is going on?
The Leftovers.Surprisingly good opening.... Lindelof will surely feck it up though
Yeah that does explain a lot.The events in the TV show take place 30 years after the events in the movie. The cops wear masks because criminals started hunting them down, so to protect their identity they wear masks. An extremist right wing group, who wears the Rorschach mask and follow some aspects of his character are the ones who started all this. Dr Manhattan is still in Mars. Veidt is officially declared dead.
Regarding epsidoe 1, this video will help -
I've not read the comics but from what I know, the comics didn't have any of the politics/racially charged narrative the TV show has. But the show merely uses the comic book as a base to build the story.Yeah that does explain a lot.
I don't remember the film having any race/white supremacy undertones so don't know if I either missed that or they've just picked it up directly from the comics. First couple of episodes have been pretty good.
I saw a comment by an editor on IGN and apparently HBO screened the first 6 episodes for the press and according to her, is just keeps getting better and better.I like how they made the show within the show a parody of Zack Snyder aesthetics...
Also, making Rorschach a hero to the white fascist terror group is a spot on reading of the original text, and Moore’s sensibilities in general.
Still, waiting for Lindelof to feck it up.
Have you seen Leftovers? It kept getting better and better and he nailed the ending. He's come a long way since Lost.Still, waiting for Lindelof to feck it up.
Mate.... mate mate mate.... Mate!! No.I've not read the comics but from what I know, the comics didn't have any of the politics/racially charged narrative the TV show has.
Claiming the 2019 TV show has politicised Watchmen, is like claiming Bryan Singer politicised the X Men.CBA: When you read some of Ditko's diatribes in "The Question" and in some issues of Blue Beetle, did you read it with bemusement or disgust?
Alan: [Stuff about loving the art hating the artist] I learned pretty quickly about the sources of Steve Ditko's ideas, and I realized very early on that he was very fond of the writing of Ayn Rand.
CBA: Did you explore her philosophy?
Alan: I had to look at The Fountainhead. I have to say I found Ayn Rand's philosophy laughable. It was a "white supremacist dreams of the master race," burnt in an early-20th century form.
CBA: Just to map this out: The prototype for Rorshach was The Question, right?
Alan: The Question was Rorschach, yep.
The film was - ironically (in the real sense, not the wrong American one) - directed by someone whose next movie (and self-avowed passion project) is literally an adaptation of the founding text of the same junk ideology Alan Moore was deliberately trying to ridicule in the comic.Yeah that does explain a lot.
I don't remember the film having any race/white supremacy undertones so don't know if I either missed that or they've just picked it up directly from the comics. First couple of episodes have been pretty good.
Thank you for correcting me, I was going by some article I read. I've wanted to read the original comics for some time now, maybe I'll try to find some time in the coming weeks.Mate.... mate mate mate.... Mate!! No.
I’m practically a layman in comic culture terms, but even I know that Watchmen is one of the most intrinsically political works of superhero fiction, ever! It pretty much created political post modernism in comics. Most of Alan Moore’s work in the 80s was an unsubtle critique of Thatcherism (V for Vendetta) and Reaganism (Watchmen)...
The biggest failure of the Snyder movie, and every subsequent Watchmen project before this, was the abject failure to politicise it. And the complete misreading of characters like Rorschach as badass ass kicking heroes...
Per Moore himself...
Or...
Claiming the 2019 TV show has politicised Watchmen, is like claiming Bryan Singer politicised the X Men.
The best thing about these episodes so far is just how willing they’ve been to lean into the overt social politics of a modern Watchmen universe. Anyone telling you otherwise doesn’t understand it... or maybe doesn’t want to.
What’s the Lindelof reference you keep making Mockney?The film was - ironically (in the real sense, not the wrong American one) - directed by someone whose next movie (and self-avowed passion project) is literally an adaptation of the founding text of the same junk ideology Alan Moore was deliberately trying to ridicule in the comic.
So naturally there was a bit of dissonance. And amusingly, a lot of people only familiar with the film, have been quite surprised by the abundant but on brand social commentary, as well as a lack of scenes where people slow down and then speed up again several times during a fight set to a rockin’ Smashing Pumpkins jam!
Just watch the second episode. It will all make much more sense.I'm with Noodle. Watched the first episode and have no idea what's going on.
I've watched the first 2 episodes and have no clue whats going on.I'm with Noodle. Watched the first episode and have no idea what's going on.
OK, so this could be a massive spoiler, so don't tell me I didn't warn youI've watched the first 2 episodes and have no clue whats going on.
For one what the feck is going on with Jeremy Irons?
I think that it's taking for granted that you know the back story then. As someone who never read the comics or watched the film I have no clue who most of the main players are or what they are doing.OK, so this could be a massive spoiler, so don't tell me I didn't warn you
Episode 3 explains a bit about the origins of the seventh cavalry among other thingsLooks like Veidt is in another planet, probably Mars, where he's been kept captive by Dr Manhattan. He's probably bio transformed the area and has built a dome like structure with clones to take care of Veidt. I think he's trying to make a space suit of some kind to escape but because it's super cold outside the dome, the clone froze to death.
Oh yeah, you should definitely try to watch the movie. If you haven't, you wouldn't understand many of things happening in the show. The movie is pretty good but I've heard the comics are way better.I think that it's taking for granted that you know the back story then. As someone who never read the comics or watched the film I have no clue who most of the main players are or what they are doing.
Watching it now.Oh yeah, you should definitely try to watch the movie. If you haven't, you wouldn't understand many of things happening in the show. The movie is pretty good but I've heard the comics are way better.
She was absolutely brilliant. My favourite episode yet.Jean Smart was outstanding in epi3
Hmmm. See I actually quite like the film, but this does make a lot of sense since for something so gloomy and dark it didn't really seem to be about anything, other than a story about the characters in it. Feels like Snyder kind of missed a trick. Seems odd he'd take it on as a project if he wanted to ignore or paint out the message behind it. It's still the least shite comic book film he's made.The film was - ironically (in the real sense, not the wrong American one) - directed by someone whose next movie (and self-avowed passion project) is literally an adaptation of the founding text of the same junk ideology Alan Moore was deliberately trying to ridicule in the comic.
So naturally there was a bit of dissonance. And amusingly, a lot of people only familiar with the film, have been quite surprised by the abundant but on brand social commentary, as well as a lack of scenes where people slow down and then speed up again several times during a fight set to a rockin’ Smashing Pumpkins jam!
Not really. Zach Snyder doesn’t understand anything he adapts. This is the guy whose “money shot” of Batman vs Superman had Batman holding a gun, and then randomly mowing down people in his carSeems odd he'd take it on as a project if he wanted to ignore or paint out the message behind it.
Oh that makes sense of 'that scene' then.Also, anyone watching the film needs to keep in mind that it’s following on from the comics, not the film, which ends very differently, with a different reason being blamed for events... which is going to be even more confusing for you, especially since it’s already been referenced, and involves a major character being viewed entirely differently.
Is the film vastly different, or just the end result?Also, anyone watching the film needs to keep in mind that it’s following on from the comics, not the film, which ends very differently, with a different reason being blamed for events... which is going to be even more confusing for you, especially since it’s already been referenced, and involves a major character being viewed entirely differently.
Yeah true. I meant odd in the general sense, not in the Snyder sense specifically. I don't really think every film has to to be loyal to the source material or deliver the same message as the source material, but he's certainly very good at making them about nothing at all.Not really. Zach Snyder doesn’t understand anything he adapts. This is the guy whose “money shot” of Batman vs Superman had Batman holding a gun, and then randomly mowing down people in his car
Snyder just read the comics and thought some of the scenes sounded badass. That film was awful.Yeah true. I meant odd in the general sense, not in the Snyder sense specifically. I don't really think every film has to to be loyal to the source material or deliver the same message as the source material, but he's certainly very good at making them about nothing at all.
Enjoyed all the episodes of this so far, though getting the feeling it's going down holes it's going to struggle to explain its way out of.
But... the Snyder cut!? He loves putting panels on screen but that's where it stops for him.Also, anyone watching the film needs to keep in mind that it’s following on from the comics, not the film, which ends very differently, with a different reason being blamed for events... which is going to be even more confusing for you, especially since it’s already been referenced, and involves a major character being viewed entirely differently.
Not really. Zach Snyder doesn’t understand anything he adapts. This is the guy whose “money shot” of Batman vs Superman had Batman holding a gun, and then randomly mowing down people in his car
Not really anything I can say that wouldn't be a spoiler. It's just doing that thing tv series do where at times it's being too mysterious for its own good. Often this results in fumbling attempts to tie up loose ends somewhere later down the line.Snyder just read the comics and thought some of the scenes sounded badass. That film was awful.
This is trying to do something new with the source material. For those wary of spoilers, there’s nothing in the comics that could possibly tell us what will Happen. This is a full sequel.
what holes are you worried about?
Oh wow, it's rated 6.8 on ImdB!! I've no idea why it's rated so low, it's a fantastic showBut... the Snyder cut!? He loves putting panels on screen but that's where it stops for him.
I do actually enjoy Watchmen (film) for the most part, but you just have to laugh when the Sound of Silence plays at the funeral.
I had similar Lindelof fears but am hopeful from the early reviews, I'll get round to it soon. Is there some sort of backlash that's causing its current low rating on imdb, or is it just the usual?
Probably a bit controversial or touches a nerve for some people?Oh wow, it's rated 6.8 on ImdB!! I've no idea why it's rated so low, it's a fantastic show
Almost certainly alt-right snowflakes review-bombing.Probably a bit controversial or touches a nerve for some people?
Can't think of any other reason.
That's Tim Blake Nelson and I'm fairly sure it's his normal voice or at least the voice he does in everything else he's in.What I can’t get past is the terrible Okie accent from the politician. He sounds like a Canadian trying to sound like he’s from east Texas.
Looking Glass’s accent is acceptable, if only because he’s a much cooler character.