Did you watch the video I posted?
I have now. I dunno, I think he makes some very fair points and I absolutely agree that there's a significant problem in English football (and indeed football as a whole) when it comes to a distinct lack of black managers.
But he's also incredibly selective with his evidence. He points to West Brom winning 8 of their last 10 away games (which is obviously superb) but completely ignores the fact they've only won 1 of their 9 last league games at home, which is absolutely dreadful for a side pursuing promotion. In fact - they've not even won at home this calendar year yet! That's terrible for any side in any division - before you consider they're one that's been competing for automatic promotion.
He's also incredibly selective in how he talks about Moore's virtues against Pulis' vices as well. He's correct to point out that Pulis had went on a poor run of form at the end of the 2016-17 season, but he completely ignores the fact that up until then they'd had an excellent year by their standards, around 7th or 8th for the majority of the season before then tailing off towards the end, still finishing 10th. They won the first two games of the following season before then spiraling. Pulis should've probably gone sooner, but Pulis is also a manager who's had an established track record of keeping smaller sides up and punching above their weight, even if he doesn't produce good football. A generous analysis of Pulis (like this one of Moore) would've suggested that it'd have been better to give him more time since he'd done alright there so far, and West Brom were far from condemned to relegation at that point - indeed they were still outside the bottom three. If he's going to talk about Moore producing excellent results against United and Spurs, he's got to grant Pulis' stint there the same leniency for when he was doing well.
Pardew's stint was a complete disaster, but I imagine the club would've been financially reluctant to sack another manager so soon after getting rid of Pulis. I don't remember the exact circumstances and whether or not Pardew was there for the season or with a view to staying long term, but if it was the latter then the club were obviously worried financially and would've wanted to give Pardew every chance to turn things around.
So, yes, he makes some fair points. Discussions of race have to understand that racial biases and prejudice is often incredibly subtle and not always deliberate - people absolutely can discriminate unconsciously because of what they deem to be 'normal,' or in this case what is perceived as successful. But at the same time here he omits various key facts and distorts the narrative to suit his own argument to an extent that's laughable.