Westminster Politics

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,162
Location
Manchester
When the right wing think you're left wing, and the left wing think you're right wing, you know you're doing a pretty good job of sitting in the centre.
The flaw in this argument, in this case, is that it benefits the right wing to accuse an already right wing news organisation of being too left wing. Why would they claim otherwise?

Especially considering the general Tory view is that state owned bad, privately owned "free market" good. Totally warped world view, but that is a different discussion.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
My family alone wouldn’t change much. But they’re in Telford, Kent, Wales. Real hard nosed Brexiteer land.
Is it? Our referendum result wasn't far off the national result and ironically was possibly tipped to leave by immigrants...from England.
I can’t speak for the whole of Wales, but where my family is, yes. As above, I could be a little naïve.
Aye, at least in regards to Wales as a whole I don't think it could be described as particularly Brexiteer land. The country voted for Brexit, but it was by a small margin and the impact of English communities within Wales (especially the older population) had a significant influence on this. I think the population of Wales is about 25% English, with many of this number being retired pensioners who have moved across the border. Danny Dorling of Oxford Uni has spoken a little about this but it's not something that has been generally spoken about much by Welsh or UK media.

I imagine Psuedo's family are based in the Eastern half, or Pembrokeshire, which are very much Brexiteer land. You can see map similarity when you look at the general election results and the Brexit results. The country voted for a Corbyn led Labour in 2017 and 2019, and along with the areas that voted Plaid are the areas that voted to remain, whereas the other areas in the East or Pembrokeshire that voted to leave also vote conservative.

One of the few places that doesn't fit into the above summary is Swansea, which voted to leave but always votes Labour. Although pertinently to psuedo's point about a change in brexit stance amonst former brexiteers, at least in 2018 anyway, Focaldata had found using YouGov polling that 14 constituencies had swung to remain from leave, with the Swansea area experiencing the biggest impact of this. This might have changed once again since then, but at least in conjunction with that polling and Wales voting Labour, I can't imagine that if the vote was repeated today that Wales would vote Brexit again.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,557
I see on the same day he looks to implement plans for a GP table that 'names & shames' GPs who don't offer enough face-to-face appointments (whatever enough means in this context), he's pulled out of an appearance at the RCGP Annual Conference - what a coward!
 

Mart1974

harbours delusions of insignificance
Joined
Nov 13, 2013
Messages
3,496
Pretty much just fast food joints and pubs.
That isn't what is killing people early in Blackpool. It is an area of massive social deprivation. Lots of drug abuse and a seasonal economy that is in tatters, people come here for work and kind of get trapped in bedsit land with slum landlords and poor housing. Austerity hit Blackpool hard and a lot of the community support projects like sure start have closed.

We do have a guy who runs a £1 burger stall though....
 

Compton22

Knows that he knows nothing.
Joined
Jul 27, 2014
Messages
3,386
This is one part of the political climate which may work in Labour's favour. Lib Dems will split the Conservative vote amongst those who are centre right.

If only Labour weren't so split themselves...
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,796
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
Who would know the law better, eh? An expert in law who has had to qualify as a lawyer, then demonstrate capability enough to be appointed as a judge, then prove themselves enough to hear senior court cases, or somebody who might have got 30% of a vote in a single constituency and then licked the Prime Minister's arsehole clean enough to get appointed as a minister.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,240
Location
bin
This is one part of the political climate which may work in Labour's favour. Lib Dems will split the Conservative vote amongst those who are centre right.

If only Labour weren't so split themselves...
Labour just need a few more votes and they can get their coalition with the SNP. I mean, it will result in the last Labour government that ever existed after Scotland leaves but on the plus side Sturgeon has promised us free heroin and unicorns.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Today there is an article in the Guardian about British involvement in the mass killings in Indonesia.
 

Flying high

Full Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Messages
1,715
Labour just need a few more votes and they can get their coalition with the SNP. I mean, it will result in the last Labour government that ever existed after Scotland leaves but on the plus side Sturgeon has promised us free heroin and unicorns.
Imagine how much easier it would all have been, had the brexiteers thought of that one. Who'd give a crap about food shortages.
 

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,220
Facial recognition computers have found an unlikely new niche: scanning the faces of thousands of British pupils in school canteens.
On Monday, nine schools in North Ayrshire will start taking payments for school lunches by scanning the faces of pupils, claiming that the new system speeds up queues and is more Covid-secure than the card payments and fingerprint scanners they used previously.
“It’s the fastest way of recognising someone at the till — it’s faster than card, it’s faster than fingerprint,” said David Swanston, the managing director of CRB Cunninghams, the company that installed the systems.
https://www.ft.com/content/af08fe55-39f3-4894-9b2f-4115732395b9?shareType=nongift
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
How is this not headline news?
What it the difference between a dictatorship and the UK now if the courts have to follow Ministers instructions? Why have a court at all? Save that money and let the government decide who is guilty or not?
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,363
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Raab's quote in the Telegraph is extremely vague on this, but it does sound worrying. The examples given of interventions that scuppered or criticised government projects/laws were the bedroom tax and the proposed tunnel next to Stonehenge, which were both highly contentious and hardly the sort of pesky meddling Raab was inferring.

Outlining plans to use legislation to "correct" judgments, Mr Raab said: "We're identifying the problems and we're making sure we fix them ... We will get into the habit of legislating on a more periodic basis and thinking about the mechanism for that. Where there have been judgments that, albeit properly and duly delivered by the courts, we think are wrong, the right thing is for Parliament to legislate to correct them."
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,555
Location
The Zone
‘What kidnappers do’ – DWP forcing universal credit claimants to pose for photo with daily paper

People are being forced to submit photos of themselves holding a local daily paper outside their home in order to claim universal credit.
The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) verification process contains a detailed list of bizarre requests potential claimants must follow. It also includes requiring people to send in a photo taken by someone else of them holding their street sign in their right hand.

The instructions were posted in at least one person’s universal credit journal – the online platform used to manage benefit claims – by a DWP employee, according to the Public Interest Law Centre (PILC).
This is part of a package of measures to clamp down on benefit fraud, the DWP told The Big Issue. Separately, the director general for universal credit confirmed the requirements were legitimate and said they were part of the government’s effort to verify people who signed up for benefits during the pandemic, when face-to-face meetings were not possible.
The instructions, issued to a person making their first claim, read: “Further to today’s phone call, I now require you to provide the following information. If you don’t provide all of the information that we’ve requested your claim will be closed.” The directions asked the claimant, who remains anonymous, to upload a photo of their ID plus a separate picture of the ID held next to their face.

They then asked for “a photo of you stood outside the front door (open behind you) of the property you live at. Ask someone to take this from the street so whole property can be seen. “A photo of you stood next to your street sign with you[r] right hand holding it. Ask someone to take this photo from a few metres away so that the background can be clearly seen. “A photo of you holding your local newspaper for the area you live (not a national tabloid newspaper). This should be dated the same day you upload the photo.” The final point is “what kidnappers do”, the PILC said.

The person could still be required to attend a job centre meeting even after providing the requested pictures “before any consideration is given to awarding [their] universal credit”, the post in the journal stated. “In the first lockdown we suspended face-to-face verification,” Neil Couling, director general for the universal credit programme, tweeted when PILC posted a screenshot of the journal entry.
“Prior to Covid in cases where there was a doubt we used to call people into Jobcentres. Initially we used a “Trust and Protect” approach [when verifying claimants’ identities]. “We knew some would abuse that, I’ve been very open about that, but it was for the greater good. But we always said we would go back and check. And this is part of that, given restrictions mean we can’t yet use our Jobcentres to the full.
“So this is a temporary process, tailed for the restrictions we are still under. Eventually we will be able to return to interviews in Jobcentres in cases of doubt about identity. So there’s nothing to worry about here for claimants, they can engage with confidence.” Couling referred to an annual DWP report published in July which warned identity theft led to around 4,000 people being asked to repay money they did not claim in the first place. The instructions posted in the universal credit journal did not state what the claimant should do if they did not have access to a smart phone, could not get another person’s help to take the photos in the time given, could not reach their local street sign, if a daily local newspaper was not published in their area or if they could not afford to buy one.

“This kind of communication only shows how utterly disconnected the DWP is from the lived experience of people surviving on a low income,” Benjamin Morgan, research and communications coordinator at the PILC, told The Big Issue after the organisation’s client received the instructions. “There are a range of reasons – ranging from disability to not having a permanent address – why claimants might reasonably find it impossible to fulfil such conditions. “Policing universal credit claimants in this way is both humiliating and dehumanising.” When a person does successfully sign up for universal credit, they face a five-week wait for a first payment which has been blamed for soaring poverty and food bank use. The 5.2 million people currently claiming the benefit will receive their first reduced payment in the coming weeks after the government cut universal credit by £20 per week, taking £1,040 from claimants’ annual incomes.

A DWP spokesperson told The Big Issue: “At the start of the pandemic we suspended face-to-face verification of new claims as part of our Trust and Protect scheme to ensure all legitimate claimants got paid. “We always said we would go back and verify claims, in order to protect the public purse, as some people sadly chose to abuse the temporary arrangements. “We are now checking cases and have implemented this approach temporarily in a small number of cases where a claimant has been unable to interact with us remotely, ahead of the return of in-person verification at jobcentres.”

https://bigissue.com/news/social-ju...claimants-to-pose-for-photo-with-daily-paper/