diarm
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2014
- Messages
- 16,767
How much more than Villa are we under the Glazers? Usually top 4 and the odd Europa League? I wish I was as ambitious as you.Ah, so we wanna be Villa Sign me up
How much more than Villa are we under the Glazers? Usually top 4 and the odd Europa League? I wish I was as ambitious as you.Ah, so we wanna be Villa Sign me up
Usually?How much more than Villa are we under the Glazers? Usually top 4 and the odd Europa League? I wish I was as ambitious as you.
Pretty sure there's already a club there for you.There are hundreds of clubs outside the Premier League. City were down there a decade ago and are odds on to be in a Champions League final at the end of the month. Football doesn't die just because you're watching in the Championship for a couple of seasons.
Our club is more important than this seasons 2nd place and even a couple of seasons outside the top flight. I'd take it without hesitation if it meant getting rid of the Glazers and I would enjoy the journey back up to the top.
You are right and last week when the ESL looked a reality, I was prepared to go. I decided a few years ago that if we were taken over by the Saudis I would go.Pretty sure there's already a club there for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F.C._United_of_Manchester
Fan owned and working its way up from the bottom of English football.
I get it. You don't want to be Villa but you are happy being Spurs.Usually?
Soon to be confirmed in 3 Champions Leagues of the last 4, Villa have been in 0 of the last 30.
Spurs are soon to be confirmed in 1 of the last 4 CL’s and looking likely to get worse, we on the other hand have never looked better placed for a title push since Fergie left.I get it. You don't want to be Villa but you are happy being Spurs.
If fans buy the club they don't need anything in return beyond owning part of the club they support and having a voteHoping we have not cut off our nose to spite our face!
That the trashing of the famous OT pitch by 'our fans' isn't forever circulated in news programme's whenever ownership of the club is mentioned.
The Glazers are going nowhere until forced to do so, either by regulation or loss of money, like all 'carpet-baggers' when the money runs out they run out too! Their mistake over the Super League was a massive opportunity the widen the fight, the protest outcomes yesterday may have closed that down for good.
We know fans will still purchase season tickets, match tickets, visit the mega store and people will still want to buy anything with the United name and coat of arms on, perversely the Glazers might even gain more sponsors!!
If someone or some group is going to pay £4B for the club, what will they want in return?
How else other than another leveraged buyout do you buy something that pricey?So if the new owner doesn’t have 3bn quid, where it is coming from? Personal debt?
without getting into the debate. Surely THE BEST outcome would be to an ethical buyer. I understand that some might see the Saudi’s as an alternative (and we won’t go into the rights and wrongs of that) - but you would have to agree there would be far better owners then them in a best case scenario.
What? Last season was the first season Spurs finished outside the top 4 since 2015. It's irrelevant anyway, my point was merely that you and I clearly want different things.Spurs are soon to be confirmed in 1 of the last 4 CL’s and looking likely to get worse, we on the other hand have never looked better placed for a title push since Fergie left.
Glazer patsy!!!!Maybe I'm misunderstanding how to support a football club properly, but I'm against the club being relegated. That's just me though.
Who wants the club to be relagated? Some of us are merely responding to a question about whether we'd accept that to get rid of the Glazers.Maybe I'm misunderstanding how to support a football club properly, but I'm against the club being relegated. That's just me though.
How else other than another leveraged buyout do you buy something that pricey?
Any potential owner will have to stump up collateral, it's a given for acquisitions of this size and nature.
One hell of a strawman there, no I’m not happy for us to be also runs, I think we are in a position now where we might actually have a title challenge in us next year, I’m hopeful for that anyway.You are happy for us to remain also rans. 2nd place and a good run at the Europa League is success for you. Long live the Glazers.
I want United to be United again. I want us to be the club fans from other countries think of when they hear the Premier League mentioned. I want us to be challenging for Champions Leagues every year while playing in the best stadium in the land. I want players to dream of playing for Manchester United again.
And if it takes a year outside the top flight to get rid of them and get back there, I would welcome that. Because I have more faith in us getting back there that way, than I do of it ever happening under the Glazers.
All this is fantastic. So we get relegated, lose all our big sponsorship deals, our best players and the Glazers then sell for 1bn to...someone. We then get promoted and with our much reduced revenue and worse players we go toe to toe with an oil state whilst also managing to invest huge amounts in our stadium. Sign me up.What? Last season was the first season Spurs finished outside the top 4 since 2015. It's irrelevant anyway, my point was merely that you and I clearly want different things.
You are happy for us to remain also rans. 2nd place and a good run at the Europa League is success for you. Long live the Glazers.
I want United to be United again. I want us to be the club fans from other countries think of when they hear the Premier League mentioned. I want us to be challenging for Champions Leagues every year while playing in the best stadium in the land. I want players to dream of playing for Manchester United again.
And if it takes a year outside the top flight to get rid of them and get back there, I would welcome that. Because I have more faith in us getting back there that way, than I do of it ever happening under the Glazers.
They Glazers have taken more than a billion out of our club since taking over. We wouldn't need investment because we will always be able to generate money.One hell of a strawman there, no I’m not happy for us to be also runs, I think we are in a position now where we might actually have a title challenge in us next year, I’m hopeful for that anyway.
The only way we are getting back to the top after relegation like you’re talking about is the way city did, and that is with an investment of around £1 billion. How on earth is that an attractive proposition for any potential buyer or for any fans for that matter?
Basically this.All this is fantastic. So we get relegated, lose all our big sponsorship deals, our best players and the Glazers then sell for 1bn to...someone. We then get promoted and with our much reduced revenue and worse players we go toe to toe with an oil state whilst also managing to invest huge amounts in our stadium. Sign me up.
We won't have another leveraged buyout, hopefully there will be some form of government reform in order to assist with this.Buys the most peoples problem with the current owners is the debt they leveraged onto the company/football club? That was at a time when the club was so much cheaper to buy. Imagine the amount of leveraged the debt on Manchester United if someone was buying it for £3 billion
Are you being serious or what?If fans buy the club they don't need anything in return beyond owning part of the club they support and having a vote
No, we won’t generate the same kind of money if we become cannon fodder and the chances of finding an owner who will not want any profit from the club after Glazers are gone are slim to none. Unless you expect fans to buy out the club but I think you’d find that it’s impossible.They Glazers have taken more than a billion out of our club since taking over. We wouldn't need investment because we will always be able to generate money.
We are not Bolton or Sunderland. Remove the debt and owners who want to milk the club for profit, and the numbers in our fan base and strength of our brand will ensure we have money to compete.
All this is fantastic. So we get relegated, lose all our big sponsorship deals, our best players and the Glazers then sell for 1bn to...someone. We then get promoted and with our much reduced revenue and worse players we go toe to toe with an oil state whilst also managing to invest huge amounts in our stadium. Sign me up.
They Glazers have taken more than a billion out of our club since taking over. We wouldn't need investment because we will always be able to generate money.
It really is a strange thought process, I would imagine most of our money comes from sponsor deals, we will most likely lose most of the lucrative ones and you can be sure Adidas won't be forking out 750m for the kit deal.No, we won’t generate the same kind of money if we become cannon fodder and the chances of finding an owner who will not want any profit from the club after Glazers are gone are slim to none. Unless you expect fans to buy out the club but I think you’d find that it’s impossible.
All this is fantastic. So we get relegated, lose all our big sponsorship deals, our best players and the Glazers then sell for 1bn to...someone. We then get promoted and with our much reduced revenue and worse players we go toe to toe with an oil state whilst also managing to invest huge amounts in our stadium. Sign me up.
After reading the some of these ideas you're not wrong at all. We would be truly fecked.
The club would be financially fecked worse than Barcelona if it was ever owned by our fans. No thanks
Okay, I'll be more specific. I'm also against the club being relegated as part of a plan to get rid of the Glazers that makes no financial sense, carries an insane level of risk and would cripple the club.Who wants the club to be relagated? Some of us are merely responding to a question about whether we'd accept that to get rid of the Glazers.
That's obviously the best case scenario to those particular set of circumstances yes. This conversation didn't start by someone asking what the most realistic scenario was for it, merely if fans would accept it if it meant getting rid of the Glazers.So basically the best case for us is to collapse, almost go bankrupt, get relegated and then maybe find a new owner who won’t want any profits from the club and will bring us back to being an European superpower a few years later?
Yep, will take years to get us back where we are if we can even get there at all. We are already competing against clubs with unfair advantage of having super rich owners who don’t really care about bottom line. The only reason we can stay up there with them is that we are basically a marketing machine which we will stop being if we go through the years of being awful (assuming we don’t go from 2nd to 18th overnight, it has to be a process of becoming progressively worse over the years).It really is a strange thought process, I would imagine most of our money comes from sponsor deals, we will most likely lose most of the lucrative ones and you can be sure Adidas won't be forking out 750m for the kit deal.
Of course it makes no financial sense. If it made financial sense how would it get rid of the Glazers? Yeah mate let's just have good financially sound ideas that make United loads of money. That will get the Glazers to leave the club. Good one.Okay, I'll be more specific. I'm also against the club being relegated as part of a plan to get rid of the Glazers that makes no financial sense, carries an insane level of risk and would cripple the club.
But hey, you do you.
3 Champions League finals and Premier League titles off the back of a squad largely built and developed before they took over, and orchestrated by the greatest football manager of all time.Oh for feck’s sake, that 1bn included a time in which we featured in 3 Champions League finals, won 1 Champions League title & a load of Premier League titles, and got some massive sponsorship deals. That you don’t get that when you are getting relegated into the championship or building up into a Premier League team again.
You’re living in a fantasy world where a Canon fodder Manchester United side is somehow as valuable and as profitable as the Manchester United side that was winning titles and now features in the Champions League most years et cetera.
We’d need a ridiculous amount of investment that the club itself couldn’t generate if we went down to the championship and tried to climb back up again, all the while trying to refurbish the stadium, trading grounds et cetera, it’s complete pie in the sky stuff.
This particular conversation was about getting relegated. People who are willing to get them out at any cost regardless of consequence, who would take their place and how much it fecks the team over is genuinely cult like. The best case is yesterday and the threat of regulation brings them to the negotiating table - and hopefully the fan groups can be united in what they demand.We wouldn't have to get relegated.. would the Glazers wait till their investment completely bombed before parting ways? They're not stupid.