Good shout! That was something that gave me great hope for LvG here - oh well.LVG with AZ. Finished 11, wanted to resign, players asked him to stay, started the new season (2008-2009) with two losses, then won the league.
Good shout! That was something that gave me great hope for LvG here - oh well.LVG with AZ. Finished 11, wanted to resign, players asked him to stay, started the new season (2008-2009) with two losses, then won the league.
And they say the League don't lie.No mate. That was a fluke. All the big clubs failed to turn up.
Good shout. Davids must take most of the credit - 6 wins in Barcelona's opening 18 games without him, then 14 wins out of the next 16 games following his arrival.Frank Rijkaard had a terrible start at Barcelona. Then mid-season they got Edgar Davids and things massively changed. They lost the league, but closed a huge gap from from Real, and went on to win the league and the CL over the next few years.
Huh. City were the best team in the PL by advanced metrics, they mostly struggled with poor finishing and soft, dumb goals conceded because they had nothing better than Sagna and Clichy...not for nothing the moment they replaced those two with good players the dumb goals conceded stopped, finishing went back to normal and they ripped off 100 pointsGuardiola at City.
They never remotely looked like winning the title in his first season and went out in the CL to a vastly inferior Monaco side. A lot of frustrating results, especially at home, and a lot of fans wanted him out.
However, he then went on to spend 10 billion quid and improve City's return of 2 titles in the 5 years before he came in to 3 titles in the first 5 years of his reign.
Truly the greatest of all time.
That style of football is always going to result in excellent advanced metrics. The problem is that it is extremely risky and that you need extremely good players in all positions to pull it off AND get results. Which is why it works only with ridiculously good teams and against top opposition it is not that effective as evident from his CL record outside of Barcelona.Huh. City were the best team in the PL by advanced metrics, they mostly struggled with poor finishing and soft, dumb goals conceded because they had nothing better than Sagna and Clichy...not for nothing the moment they replaced those two with good players the dumb goals conceded stopped, finishing went back to normal and they ripped off 100 points
And as for the vastly inferior Monaco side...city signed 2 players off them, Fabinho went to liverpool, bakayoko to chelsea, lemar to atletico madrid and their attack was Mbappé and Falcao back to ~80% of his best...I really would not call them vastly inferior to City...
Plus, City dominated most of the tie - again, it was extremely poor finishing that did them in, along with some characteristic poor defending on a set piece
Mmmmmm………And they say the League don't lie.